Post

colword.std
colword.std
Show original
账面收益:一个躺沙发边,一个滚床底 $BTC 从 9/11 的 77,191 走到 76,372,7 日 -1.06%;$ETH 从 2,515 走到 2,433,-3.27%。前半段剧本一模一样:9/11 双双摸高($BTC 79,859、$ETH 2,666),9/15 双双挨大阴棒。差别在后半段——$BTC 至今守在 76,000 上方没破位,$ETH 连 2,450 都没站回去,反弹全靠一张嘴。 回撤这边,$BTC 最大回撤 3.3%(79,859 到 74,909),$ETH 5.1%(2,666 到 2,357)。$ETH 是窜天猴体质,跌得深弹得快,但这一轮它的快只体现在跌上。 聪明钱站哪边 持仓端累计净流向:$BTC +4,210 万美元,$ETH -6,250 万美元,方向完全相反。细看 $BTC 这条线也不算体面——9/12 曾单日流出 1.98 亿,靠后三日连续净流入(9/17 单日 +9,420 万)才把账面拉正,属于资金硬撑;$ETH 是实打实的撤退,9/16 单日就跑了 2.81 亿。 $BTC ETF 也没给面子,9/15 单日流出 4.50 亿。
colword.std
colword.std
BTC vs ETH Money-Making Ability Comparison. PK Day | Verdict $BTC Let's put the verdict here first; if you disagree, keep it to yourself. This round $BTC wins, not because it makes money, but because it loses less. 7-day returns: $BTC -1.06% vs $ETH -3.27%. Both are down, but $BTC is at least lying on the sofa, while $ETH is rolling under the bed. Sharpe ratio: $BTC -1.85 vs $ETH -4.32; after risk adjustment, both are equally miserable; smart money has voted too, with cumulative net inflow of $BTC holdings at +42.1 million, and $ETH holdings at a net outflow of 62.5 million. $ETH has fallen so hard in these seven days that it shows no mercy, smashing the bulls' wallets "to pieces" without even cleaning up. Volatility and Sharpe, true colors revealed after risk $BTC annualized volatility is 32.6%, $ETH 44.7%; $ETH is naturally more volatile. Sharpe ratios $BTC -1.85, $ETH -4.32, both negative—translated into plain language: holding either in these seven days results in losses, but holding $ETH loses more than twice as fast as $BTC. Average fees: $BTC 0.0059% vs $ETH 0.0017%; $BTC bulls are still willing to pay to hold on, while $ETH bulls can't even be bothered to pay the holding interest, which says a lot about the attitude.

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!