Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
2025年初,Aave DAO通过了一项回购计划:授权财务委员会每周在二级市场买100万美元的AAVE,年化约5000万美元。 听起来不错对吧? 但注意一个词:授权。 委员会可以随时调整、暂停、或者干脆不买。你持有的AAVE能不能被回购,取决于那帮人今天心情好不好。 2026年3月,这个担心变成了现实。 DAO投票把年度回购预算从5000万美元砍到了3000万美元。理由很直白:借贷手续费收入较峰值下降了25%,2026年1月收入795万美元,远低于2025年1月的1350万美元。 翻译一下就是:账算不过来了,不砍不行。 当时一个社区成员的评论很扎心:“从手动到自动,这步棋走得对,但关键看回购资金从哪来。” 这就是旧世界的真相——回购,从来不是承诺,是施舍。 转折来了。 2026年6月27日,Aave正式确认Aavenomics 3.0上线。 核心变化只有一个,但足够颠覆: 回购从“委员会决定”变成了“协议默认”。 具体怎么运作的? 第一,收入流向变了。 根据2026年4月通过的“Aave Will Win”框架,Aave协议、GHO稳定币以及Aave App、Aave Pro、Swaps等所有品牌产品100%的收入,直接进入DAO国库。 Aave Labs?只领开发预算,一分产品收入不碰。 第二,回购的执行方式变了。 以前是委员会每周手动决定买不买、买多少。现在是不可篡改的链上机制自动执行——资金按定义好的周期进入回购合约,通过批准的渠道下单,结算为AAVE。 第三,也是最重要的——叫停的门槛变了。 Aavenomics 3.0的设计逻辑是:回购持续运行,除非治理主动投票叫停。 注意这个逻辑的反转。旧世界里,回购需要“批准”才能发生。新世界里,回购是“默认状态”,停止才需要“批准”。 这就是制度设计层面的范式跃迁。 看数据,这事有多大的量级。 Aave协议当前年化收入约4.02亿美元,历史累计手续费超22.1亿美元。 GHO流通量约5.99亿美元。 Aave创始人Stani Kulechov披露,仅Aave品牌产品的年化收入就达1.34亿美元,全部归DAO。 调整后的自动回购模型预计每日可买入约292枚AAVE,同时留存2000万美元稳定币作为储备。 而旧的委员会制回购,从2025年4月到2026年初,累计买了超过205,000枚AAVE,约占总供应量的1.28%。 数据不会骗人。这不是“喊话利好”,这是收入在往代币上倒。 但最关键的一点,不是数字。 是消除了持币者面对的最大不确定性——“委员会今天心情好不好”。 你可能觉得“回购自动化”只是一个执行效率问题。不。 这是DeFi治理最核心的命题:到底谁说了算。 旧的Aavenomics Part One ARFC明确写了,财务委员会有权“重定向、暂停或修改回购计划”。这意味着每一个AAVE持有者都在承担一个隐性的政治风险——如果委员会换了一批人,或者某几个大鲸鱼施压,回购随时可能变成空气。 Aavenomics 3.0把这个风险直接从系统里删掉了。 代码执行,不是委员会执行。默认运行,不是投票运行。 灰度分析师此前认为AAVE被低估,把基本目标价定在了179美元。市场也给了反应:消息公布后,AAVE从79美元一度冲到98美元,周涨幅约20%。 但价格涨多少不是重点。重点是—— 当一个协议把“利好”从“承诺”变成“默认”,它就不再需要靠喊话来维持信心了。 $BTC $ETH $AAVE
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
The Aave protocol has historically earned $2.2 billion in fees. Annualized revenue hovers around $400 million. How much of that AAVE in your hands have you received? If you can't answer, it means what you hold has never been a "cash flow asset." What you hold is a governance token. And this is changing. Let's look at the numbers first. According to DefiLlama, Aave's historical cumulative protocol fees exceed $2.2 billion, with annualized protocol revenue around $402 million. Aave founder Stani Kulechov publicly confirmed that the current annualized revenue of about $134 million fully belongs to the DAO. The protocol's ability to generate profit is indisputable. But how the money is spent is another matter. Under the current mechanism, the Aave Finance Committee buys back $1 million worth of AAVE weekly on the secondary market, annualizing to about $50 million—only about 13.7% of the income reaches token holders. What’s even more painful: this buyback can be stopped by the committee at any time. In fact, in March 2026, the DAO already reduced the annual buyback budget from $50 million to $30 million. The protocol is making a fortune, but token holders only get the portion the committee "grants." This is why AAVE has long been priced by the market as a "governance token" rather than a "cash flow asset." On September 18, Kulechov previewed Aavenomics 3.0 on X. The core change is just one: to weld the buyback into the protocol’s economic framework. The current mechanism is: the committee manually approves weekly, can pause, reduce, or reallocate. The 3.0 mechanism is: automated, non-discretionary on-chain buybacks, funded jointly by protocol revenue and GHO revenue. It runs continuously unless governance votes to stop it. In plain language: Before, it was "the committee buys if it wants to, doesn’t if it doesn’t." From now on, "the protocol buys automatically, and you have to vote specifically to stop it." From a "37% buyback ratio" to "protocol default continuous buying pressure." This is not a quantitative change; it’s a qualitative one. Currently, AAVE’s fully diluted market cap is about $1.4–1.5 billion. In a report released by Grayscale in June, using a DCF model, they gave AAVE a fair value range of $80–100, with a one-year target price of $175—reasoning based on traditional fintech companies’ 20–25x P/E ratio, corresponding to a reasonable market cap of $1.2–1.5 billion. Note: When Grayscale released this report, AAVE spot price was only around $73. Now, AAVE has risen to the $130–145 range. The "fair value" judged by Grayscale has already been priced in by the market ahead of time. So what’s next? Aavenomics 3.0 is not about answering "how much money can Aave make"—that question has been answered: $400 million. It’s about answering: how much of Aave’s earnings will turn into AAVE buy pressure. When buybacks change from "committee approval once a week" to "protocol automatic daily execution," the valuation anchor shifts from "TVL + governance premium" to "cash flow + buyback yield." These are two completely different pricing systems. The former gives a governance token valuation. The latter gives an income-generating asset valuation. Grayscale’s $80–100 may just be the starting point of a revaluation. Aave has long held both extremes in DeFi: the most profitable protocol and the token least regarded as a "business." What 3.0 aims to do is simple: weld these two ends together. In the coming weeks, Aave’s quarterly call will announce the full specifications and governance timetable. Until then, you can keep asking yourself this question: Why shouldn’t the $400 million Aave earns turn into buy pressure for your AAVE? $BTC $ETH $AAVE

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!