Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
6.9美元的UNI,你还在等什么? 日活地址创年内新高,CME都上线UNI期货了,费用开关烧币机制也落地了——但价格从9月的11刀跌到6.9,利好全砸进去,就是不涨。这到底是DeFi龙头被市场抛弃,还是暴风雨前最后一次安静? 先看表面:利好出尽,价格躺平。 9月冲高接近11刀,然后一路回调到6.5-7.5震荡,现在卡在6.9附近反复摩擦。日线RSI 49,中性。MA20在7.0,反复测。成交量没放大,市场像睡着了一样。所有人都在问同一句话:UNI到底还行不行? 第一件事:基本面在跑,价格在躺——这是最危险的信号,也是最诱人的机会。 先看数据,别光看价格: 日活跃地址1.46万,年内高点 新增地址创2020年以来最大增长 TVL约34-35亿美元,DEX赛道绝对龙头 v4已上线多个L2,Aggregator Hooks能路由外部流动性,产生协议费直接烧UNI 代币化股票交易量贡献显著,RWA叙事开始反哺DEX 翻译成人话:用Uniswap的人在暴增,烧UNI的机制在运转,但价格没跟上。 这叫什么?利好和价格的背离。 在币圈,背离不会永远持续。要么价格补涨,要么基本面崩掉。你觉得Uniswap的基本面会崩吗? 第二件事:CME上线UNI期货,这不是小事。 CME,芝加哥商品交易所,全球最大的衍生品交易所。BTC期货、ETH期货都在这上。 现在UNI期货也上了。 这意味着什么?华尔街的机构,可以用合规工具对冲和做多UNI了。 以前机构想配DeFi龙头,只能去链上买现货,麻烦、有托管风险。现在CME给了他们一个合规入口。 同样的剧本,2017年CME上BTC期货,当时BTC 1万刀。后来呢? 机构进场从来不是来送钱的,但他们的进场本身,就是最大的叙事。 第三件事:费用开关+燃烧已经落地,UNI不再是“没有价值捕获”的治理币。 很多人骂UNI:“治理币有什么用?又不能分红。” 老黄历了。 费用开关已激活,协议费用直接用于UNI燃烧。 Q3协议费用创近年高点,Robinhood Chain等新链贡献可观收入。 流通约6.08亿,最大10亿,无大规模解锁压力。供给在缩,需求在增,逻辑跟HYPE的飞轮一模一样——只是市场还没反应过来。 一边是: 日活、新增地址双双爆发,真实采用在加速 CME上线UNI期货,机构合规入口打开 费用开关+燃烧落地,价值捕获闭环形成 v4+Hooks打开可编程流动性新用例 6.6-6.8区间有强承接,底部结构清晰 一边是: 宏观压制:CPI、PPI、非农数据密集,降息预期极低 BTC在7万附近震荡,alt季节没来 OI从高位回落,杠杆多头情绪谨慎 9月11刀套牢盘还在,7.5以上压力重重 采用数据亮眼,但没转化成价格突破 关键位置 上方阻力:7.10-7.15(日内高)→ 7.50(确认动量)→ 8.00 下方支撑:6.80-6.85(日内低)→ 6.60-6.65(强需求区)→ 6.25(月低) 操作策略 短线选手: 6.80-6.85轻仓多,止损6.65下方,目标7.10-7.20先出一半,再看7.50。放量站稳7.15以上可追多,止损回7.0。跌破6.65确认再考虑短空,目标6.4-6.2。 波段玩家: 6.6-6.8区间逢低加仓现货或低杠杆多,止损6.2下方,目标8-9。等日线收盘站稳7.15以上再加仓,用移动止盈拿住。宏观转暖+突破确认,才是中线行情启动的信号。 长线信仰者: 6.5以下闭眼定投。UNI从11跌到6.9,跌了37%,但协议收入、燃烧机制、机构入口比2024年强了一个级别。2026年底目标10-15美元,赌的是DeFi复苏+费用捕获正循环+CME机构资金入场。 仓位控制在总资金10-15%,别All in。 UNI现在就像2020年的UNI—— 99%的人觉得“治理币没价值,DEX竞争太激烈”,结果从1刀干到45刀。$BTC $ETH $UNI
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
INIT at $0.19: Are you chasing a rebound or the bears' funeral? The network was just hacked twice and shut down for investigation, yet the coin price surged 50% in one day—Is INIT at 0.19 a bear's funeral or the last leg for the bag holders? Let's look at the surface first: Yesterday it was around 0.12, today it shot up to over 0.23 in one candle with a volume surge, and community members started shouting "takeoff." Then what? It pulled back, stuck at 0.19. First thing: Bad news didn’t crush it; instead, it became fuel. Around October 23, INIT had an infinite mint/script cache vulnerability worth about $2.7 million, causing the network and rollup to shut down for about 9 days, only recovering around November 2. On November 10, the rollup infrastructure keys were attacked again, unauthorized IBC/escrow transfers of about $615,000 to $636,000 occurred, leading to another coordinated shutdown for investigation. Logically, this coin should have been smashed through. But the result? The price surged 50%–60% against the trend amid shutdowns, investigations, and security shadows. Why? Because the shorts were too crowded. Negative funding rates at -1% to -3% per 8 hours, shorts paying longs, open interest high—this isn’t a bullish driver, it’s shorts lining up for liquidation. Bad news isn’t bullish; bad news is just the death knell for shorts. Second thing: Small market cap + low circulation means pumping doesn’t need a reason. INIT’s market cap is about $40 to $45 million, circulating supply about 219 million tokens, total supply 1 billion, circulation only about 22%. FDV is about $190 to $200 million. Small cap means it’s cheap to pump and quick to dump. You see a 50% rise; the whales see "this little money can draw a candle that makes your hands itch." The harshest thing about small caps: pumping doesn’t need a reason, dumping doesn’t need a warning. You think you’re trading a trend, but you’re actually providing an exit channel for liquidity. Third thing: Technically, this is a parabolic pullback, not a confirmed reversal. From the May 2025 ATH around 1.42 down to mid-2026 low of 0.047, recently volume increased from 0.11–0.13 range. Today it shot straight from around 0.12 to over 0.23, then pulled back to about 0.19—a typical retracement after a parabolic burst. Support: 0.17–0.18 (short term) → 0.15–0.16 → 0.13–0.12 (near 24h low) Resistance: 0.21–0.22 → 0.23–0.24 (today’s high) → 0.25–0.26 Price is above short-term moving averages, RSI neutral to slightly strong, but overbought conditions prone to pullback. Negative funding + high OI favor bulls short term, but once momentum fades, it’s a long squeeze. Don’t mistake a short squeeze for a reversal. A short squeeze only creates highs, it doesn’t hold them. Bull vs. bear showdown, you decide: On one side: Negative funding, crowded shorts, short squeeze powder keg Small cap, low circulation, low cost to pump Event-driven capital inflow, volume surge Short-term above moving averages, sentiment slightly strong On the other side: Two security incidents, network shutdown, trust not restored November 10 key attack, investigation ongoing Mid-term fundamentals still shadowed, ecosystem adoption uncertain Chasing highs after parabolic, high pullback risk Market downturn hits small caps harder Trading strategy Short-term traders: Wait for a pullback to 0.17–0.18 with volume support and no break, then try light longs with stop loss below 0.165, target 0.21–0.23 in batches. If it breaks 0.17 with volume, don’t catch the fall; watch 0.15 or even 0.13. Shorts cost is high under negative funding, so short with quick entries and exits. Swing traders: Wait for network recovery announcements + no new vulnerabilities + healthy volume before reassessing. Mid-term is not off-limits but currently looks more like event-driven short-term, not a heavy long-term hold. What is INIT like now? Like a casino robbed twice, reopening with a crowd eager to recover losses. You see a 50% rise; I see a powder keg lit by negative funding. In a market like INIT, those chasing highs pay the wages of those bottom-fishing. $BTC $ETH $INIT

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!