Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
1.04美元的SUI,你追高了吗? 先看表面:暴力拉升,1美元整数关被捅穿。 今天最低0.84,最高1.04+,振幅超过20%,成交量暴增,周线连阳脱离底部箱体。200日均线0.84-0.87被放量打穿,0.90-0.92也被踩在脚下,现价直接顶在1.04。趋势转多,但短线过热,追高就是接盘。 第一件事:这波是BTC赏饭吃,不是SUI自己牛 BTC今天冲到8.5万,空头爆仓超6亿美元,山寨普涨。SUI流动性好、杠杆盘活跃,弹性比BTC大,所以涨得更猛。 你追的不是SUI的独立行情,你追的是大盘的溢出效应。 这波轧空的主力是杠杆多头,不是现货买盘。杠杆堆出来的价格,来得快去得也快。 第二件事:生态叙事是真的,但不是今天才有的 Daya把Sui做成非洲企业无Gas稳定币结算层,Suilend 2.0上线往RWA借贷扩展,Confidential Transfers、Hashi(BTC接入)、tZERO数字证券基础设施,10月7-8日还有新加坡Sui Basecamp。 但这些东西不是今天才出现的。它们能解释“为什么资金愿意给SUI溢价”,解释不了“为什么今天必须从0.85打到1.04”。 第三件事:1.04这个位置,盈亏比烂到发指 从1.04开多,上面到1.09只有5个点,下面回踩0.92就是10%+。杠杆盘很容易把方向做对,账户做亏。 而且—— RSI接近70+,超买区 价格打出布林上轨外侧,短线需要消化 9月30日附近还有约2170万枚解锁,高位叠加抛压会更敏感 美联储上周加息25bp至3.75%-4.00%,点阵图偏鹰 多空对决,你自己看 一边是: 周线转多,脱离底部箱体,200日均线被放量打穿 生态叙事完整:支付+隐私+BTCFi+机构证券 相对2025年1月高点5.35,现价仍低80%,估值不贵 Basecamp前资金没有大额流出 链上交易量持续累积,稳定币沉淀不算差 一边是: 24小时涨23%,一周涨35%,短线严重超买 TVL从25亿掉到5亿,锁仓没跟上币价 9月30日解锁在即,高位抛压敏感 美联储偏鹰,宏观压制风险资产 这波是BTC轧空带起来的Beta,不是独立Alpha 操作策略 偏多: 等回踩0.96-0.98缩量止跌,或更深到0.90-0.92再轻仓接。 第一目标1.04-1.05,第二目标1.09-1.10。到1.10减仓,别幻想一次打到1.50。 若回踩后放量重新站上1.05并站稳,可以再加一点,加仓小于首仓。 止损:0.92接多,有效跌破0.84减仓;日线收在0.84下方,这波突破失效。 防回吐: 冲1.04-1.05不过、长上影、成交量跟不上,可以小仓短空,目标先看0.98,再看0.92。 空单止损必须短,放在1.06-1.08上方。趋势刚转,硬空容易被二次轧。 BTC若从84700回落到82000,SUI大概率先于大盘回吐。 中线: 价格回到0.90-0.92重新站稳,同时BTC守住8万,Basecamp前资金没有大额流出。否则把1.04当成波段高点附近处理,吃一段走一段。 周四中美峰会、联储讲话前减仓。 9月30日解锁前后,高位多单不要拿太满。 SUI的基本面叙事比多数山寨完整—— 但1.04是BTC轧空带起来的前线价,不是低位。 多单等0.92-0.98回踩,空单只做1.05冲高失败的反击。 不要在整数关上加杠杆对赌。 宏观仍是加息周期,SUI的弹性向上向下都比BTC大。仓位比方向更重要。 1.04这个位置,你是追多还是等回踩? $BTC $ETH $SUI
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
BTC at $84,750, are you chasing it? First, look at the surface: a 4-5% rise in 24 hours, surpassing 84,000 for the first time since the end of January, weekly chart breaking above the 50-week moving average for the first time in 45 weeks. Sounds like a bull comeback, right? But look closely—there was $750 million liquidated across the market in the past 24 hours, with shorts accounting for 86%. When the price crossed 84,000, shorts were liquidated at $260 million in a single hour. This is not new money buying in; it's shorts being forced to cover, and passive buying pushing the price up. This kind of rise is fast and steep, less sustainable than the continuous inflows seen with ETFs. First point: Short squeeze is not a bull market, it’s a short squeeze stampede. $750 million liquidated, 86% shorts. The 83,000-86,000 range is a dense short zone; once price entered, passive buying pushed the market up. What you see is a “BTC surge,” I see a “shorts’ funeral.” This squeeze comes fast and goes fast. Second point: ETFs turned net inflow positive, but the strength is moderate. Last week on the 15th-16th, there was a net outflow of $750 million; on Friday alone, a net inflow of $433 million (FBTC about $311 million, IBIT about $108 million), barely turning positive for the week by $6 million. Cumulative net inflow is $55.1 billion, ETF holdings at $102.5 billion. Conclusion: Selling pressure stopped, buying returned, but it’s not yet an “institutional buying frenzy.” This Monday’s move was driven more by derivatives than spot ETFs. Third point: Negative factors are priced in, not a restart of rate cuts. Last week, the CLARITY Act failed, and the Fed raised rates by 25 basis points, which should have pressured risk assets. Instead, the SEC granted innovative exemptions for tokenized US stocks, the CFTC advanced rule drafts, combined with four consecutive days of oil price declines, stocks and crypto both strengthened. The market is trading on “all bad news priced in,” not on “rate cut cycle restarting.” Bull vs. bear, judge for yourself: On one side: Weekly chart breaks above 50-week MA for the first time in 45 weeks, structure strengthening $750 million short squeeze, aggressive passive buying ETF flows turned positive, selling pressure stopped All bad news priced in, risk appetite warming On the other side: Squeeze ends, spot buying may not follow through Leverage longs crowding, perpetual positions expanding Rates still hawkish, possibly one more hike this year Thursday’s US-China meeting, huge event risk Upper shadows above 85,000 indicate profit-taking Resistance above: 85,300-85,500 (intraday high, squeeze end) → 88,000-90,000 (second target) Support below: 82,500-82,800 (first retest after breakout) → 80,800-81,200 (this morning’s platform) → 76,000-78,000 (box bottom, structural break if breached) Trading strategy: Wait for a pullback to 82,500-82,800, then lightly buy after 1-hour stabilization. Safer is to wait for volume contraction and stabilization at 81,200-80,800. Targets: first fill 85,300 gap, then 88,000. Stop loss: buy at 82,500, reduce positions if price breaks below 80,800; if daily closes below 80,000, breakout fails, exit first. Prevent giving back gains: If it fails to break 85,300 again, with long upper shadows and volume lagging, reduce longs or hedge with small positions. The most common path after a squeeze is: spike → retest breakout → choose direction. Failed retest is a false breakout. Mid-term: Hold longer only if: weekly closes above 50-week MA, ETFs don’t see large net outflows this week, and pullback doesn’t break 80,800. Otherwise, treat 84,700 as a near-term peak, take profits in stages. Structure is stronger than last week, price is higher than last week. 84,700 is created by the squeeze, not a safety margin. You’re not chasing a bull comeback, you’re chasing a shorts’ funeral. 84,700 is built by shorts’ liquidations, not by institutions buying with real money. Longs wait for 82,500 or 80,800; shorts should not try to top against the trend on breakout day. This week has US-China talks and a bunch of Fed speeches; volatility will be harder to trade than direction, position sizing is more important than views. At 84,750, do you dare to chase? $BTC $ETH $ZEC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!