79.70. On January 19, 2025, TRUMP coin hit its all-time high.
2.06. On October 2, 2026, the price after the dinner announcement.
Drop: 97.4%.
After the announcement, the price once surged to $2.25, then immediately fell back.
Increase: 10%. Then, nothing more.
This is not the first time. In April 2025, when the first dinner announcement came out, TRUMP coin rose from $9 to $14.40, a 60% increase.
In March 2026, the second dinner brought a 36% increase.
Now the third time, 10%.
What do you see?
The same card played three times. The first time was a royal flush, the second a straight, the third—not even a three-pair.
💊 Breaking down the illusion of the “Dinner Market Rescue”
First, the details of this dinner:
November 22, Washington Trump National Private Club
The first 185 registered investors invited
VIP status scored by “participation,” locked on November 12
Slogan: “The world’s most exclusive dinner”
Three “legendary figures” will attend—the names not yet announced
The club clearly states: “No attendee will have the opportunity for a private meeting with the president”
Translation:
You spend money to buy coins to climb the ranking. Once ranked high enough, you get a ticket. The president will come in, but you won’t meet him. You will get a commemorative poster and a bottle of “TRUMP perfume.”
At the last event, Trump only made a “brief appearance.” Some participants didn’t even get to see him.
This time they make it clear in advance: don’t expect a private meeting.
The organizer knows the last experience wasn’t great.
📉 Why is the “Dinner Effect” getting weaker each time?
Because the market isn’t stupid.
The first dinner sold novelty—the president hosting a crypto dinner was unprecedented.
The second sold inertia—some still hoped for a miracle.
The third, the market has seen clearly:
This isn’t about “benefits for holders,” it’s about “creating reasons to buy.”
When a token needs constant dinners, posters, and perfume giveaways to maintain its price, it’s no longer an asset. It’s an ongoing paid fan meeting.
Analyst Crypto Patel puts it bluntly: this crash was “entirely predictable” because the token lacks real use cases, ecosystem, and roadmap, relying solely on brand appeal and political hype.
🔪 The issuer’s “self-rescue” is even more chilling
TRUMP issuer Fight Fight Fight is doing one thing: raising $200 million to $1 billion to establish a “digital asset reserve company” to hoard TRUMP coins.
In plain language:
The project team plans to buy their own coins to prop up the price.
Think about this logic.
When a company needs to set up a special entity to buy its own product, you have to ask the simplest question:
Who will take the risk?
The issuer hoards coins themselves. After hoarding, the price goes up. Then what? Who buys?
More painfully, Fight Fight Fight controls about 65% of the total supply—out of 1 billion TRUMP coins, about 650 million are in their hands, gradually unlocking.
On one hand, they say they will establish a treasury company to “hoard coins,” on the other, they hold 650 million waiting to unlock.
Guess what, after unlocking, will they choose “long-term holding” or “sell while liquidity lasts”?
😐 The overlooked number
Nansen data: by the end of June 2026, 988,905 accounts lost money on TRUMP coin, with cumulative losses of $3.81 billion.
About two-thirds of buyers are at a loss.
Meanwhile, Trump himself earned $636 million from this project.
You lost. He profited.
Is this a “win-win”? No. It’s “you won a ticket to his fan meeting, he won your principal.”
/ Final calculation
From $79.70 to $2.06 took 20 months.
From $2.06 back to $79.70 requires a 38x increase.
The first dinner brought a 60% increase. The second 36%. The third 10%.
At this decreasing rate, the next dinner’s increase will probably only buy a bottle of TRUMP perfume.
Will the third dinner bring 38x?
You do the math.
$BTC$ETH$TRUMP
Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more
