Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
昨晚发生了一件极其荒谬的事。 布伦特原油盘中一度暴跌近8%,收盘跌5.85%至92.57美元。美股标普涨2.4%,道指涨2.2%,纳斯达克涨2.7%,AI芯片股集体狂欢。 逻辑链条看起来完美无缺:美伊和谈进展→霍尔木兹海峡要重开→油价崩→通胀预期降温→加息压力缓解→利好一切风险资产,尤其是BTC。 但比特币昨晚干了什么? 它不仅没涨,还在美股大涨的同时往下出溜。 截至今天早上,BTC报75,277美元,24小时跌0.39%。以太坊跌1.25%,XRP跌2.82%。 逻辑是对的。但盘面不认。 问题出在哪? 出在这个传导链的时间维度上。 油价下跌→通胀预期降温→加息压力缓解,这是一个月度级别的变量。它需要CPI数据连续走软来确认,需要美联储官员一个接一个改口,需要时间。 但ETF资金流出,是一个日度级别的变量。 上周,美国现货比特币ETF净流出12.82亿美元,创6月以来最大单周流出纪录,连续第二周净流出,全年资金流已经转为负值。过去24小时,7181万美元的BTC仓位被平仓,其中55.4%是多头——不是空头在砸,是多头自己在跑。 月度级别的利好还没落地,日度级别的资金已经在撤退。 当一个日度变量在持续恶化的时候,月度级别的利好根本没有办法在盘面上兑现。 更扎心的是加息预期。 非农数据超预期之后,CME显示12月加息概率已经升到78%以上。油价下跌确实给通胀预期降了温,但78%的加息概率是已经发生的定价,它当下就在压着风险资产的折现率。 你不可能用一个“未来可能下修的加息概率”,去对抗一个“当下正在发生的ETF净流出”。 远水救不了近火。慢变量救不了快资金。 那什么情况下,这条断掉的链才能接上? 盯两个信号。 第一,油价能不能真的持续待在低位。 昨晚的暴跌交易的是“谈判进展”,不是“协议达成”。美伊之间反复的概率依然很大,地缘溢价随时可能重新灌回去。 第二,ETF流出能不能停下来。 12.82亿的流出是已经发生的事实,它不会因为油价跌了8%就自动流回来。资金回流需要看到价格企稳,需要看到CPI确认通胀真的在往下走。 今晚21:30,10月CPI公布。但注意一个坑:这次没有同比数据,因为去年政府停摆导致对比基数缺失,市场只能看环比。道琼斯共识预期整体环比0.3%,核心环比0.2%。 环比降温,但还不足以把78%的加息概率一把打下去。 逻辑正确,但仓位先死。 这是每一个宏观交易者都交过的学费。 油价暴跌是好事。但好事兑现到你的账户里,中间隔着一整个资金流周期的时差。 在ETF停止流血之前,所有的宏观利好,都只是纸面上的利好。 $BTC $BZ $XAU
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Falling from 1255 to 698, is Micron finally bottomed out? Fundamentals are explosively strong, revenue surged 256%, net profit 85 billion, gross margin 87%—but the stock price has been cut in half by 40% from its peak. Just now, long positions at 698 dollars are crowded over 80%, all waiting for a rebound to break even. Is this a golden pit or a trap for thousands? First, look at the surface: good company, bad stock price. Micron FY2026 revenue is $133.2 billion, up 256% year-over-year. Q4 single quarter revenue is $54.2 billion, up 379% year-over-year, EPS $33.42, gross margin 87%. Next quarter guidance is $61.5 billion, management says "this is the low point for the whole year." Have you ever seen a "low point" guidance higher than the full-year revenue of peers? This is the madness of AI memory. But what about the stock price? It crashed from the June ATH of $1255 down to $662, now at $698. Down 33% in a month, down 18% in a week. Fundamentals are in the sky, stock price underground; this kind of divergence is the cruelest part of the market. First thing: negative news is amplified, but you don’t believe it. The Democrats won the midterm elections, what is the market afraid of? Afraid of stricter data center approvals, afraid of AI capital expenditure shrinking, afraid of debt financing costs crushing data center construction. Plus, media amplifying concerns about Chinese supply, chip stocks collectively collapsed. But think calmly: $150 billion RPO (Remaining Performance Obligations) is there, most long-term customer agreements have price floors. Orders are signed, prices locked, what are you afraid of? What you fear is sentiment. The market switched from "AI unlimited narrative" to "financing cost doubts," once this switch happens, even good companies’ stock prices get indiscriminately smashed. When the market panics, it never distinguishes between good and bad companies; it only distinguishes "whether there is someone to take the other side." Second thing: valuation is ridiculously cheap, but you dare not buy. Based on realized earnings, MU’s P/E is only single digits to low double digits. Forward is even lower. Analyst consensus is Strong Buy, target price 1500+. You pay 698 for a company with 87% gross margin, abundant net cash, and explosive free cash flow—is it expensive? No. But you fear it will fall further. You don’t not know it’s cheap; you fear others will panic more than you after you buy. Third thing: longs are too crowded, this is the real risk. Open interest about 200 million USDT, accounts long ratio over 80%, top traders also predominantly long. But takers are short biased, funding rate slightly positive. Everyone thinks "it has fallen so much it should rebound," all crowded on the long side. What does this structure fear most? One bearish candle wiping out all stop losses, then the real bottom appears. Long crowding is not because they are right, it’s because no one wants to admit defeat. Long-short showdown, you decide: On one side: FY2026 revenue +256%, net profit 85 billion, gross margin 87% Q1 guidance $61.5 billion, management calls it the yearly low $150 billion RPO + price floors, very high visibility Valuation single-digit P/E, analyst target 1500+ December buyback restrictions expire, large-scale buyback expected On the other side: 40% drop from ATH, 33% drop in one month Daily/weekly bearish structure, price far below moving averages Longs crowded over 80%, high squeeze risk Macroeconomic inflation fluctuations, interest rates suppress growth stocks Policy uncertainty after midterm elections Key levels Resistance above: 720-750 (recent highs/pivot) → 800+ Support below: 650-670 (recent lows) → 620-600 Trading strategy Short-term players: don’t chase at 698. Wait for a pullback to 670-680 to lightly test longs, stop loss below 650, target 710-730. Add more if volume supports a stable break above 720, target 750. Break below 650 looks at 620-600 directly. Swing players: wait for daily stabilization signals—hold above moving averages, RSI rebound, volume confirmation. Target 800-900. If macro deteriorates and retests near 600, that’s a better mid-to-long-term entry zone. December buyback launch is a catalyst, pre-position but don’t go full. Long-term believers: dollar-cost average between 600-650. Fundamental golden pit, valuation ridiculously cheap. 2027 target per analyst consensus 1500+, but cyclical stocks require patience. Remember: good company ≠ good stock, good price = good opportunity. MU now looks like Micron at the end of 2022— 99% thought "chip cycle peaked," but it went from 50 to 150. $BTC $MU $NVDA

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!