Looks like you're in the United States. Switch to the United States site for products available in your region.
Posteo
taishiro
Mostrar original
The HBM trade is becoming a capacity allocation story, not just an AI demand story.
When memory inventory gets this tight, chipmakers face a choice: prioritize high margin HBM or supply conventional DRAM. That competition can push memory prices higher, but it also makes supply normalization the biggest risk to the trade.
SK Hynix has the advantage today, but Samsung's progress shows that leadership is not guaranteed.
#SamsungQ3ProfitOutlook
ARRIWYKS
#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings
#Hynix Cloud +AI HBM4 Cloud = Cuello de botella de memoria ahora, no GPU
Mercado HBM $38B→$58B +52% 26E, $85B 27E. SK = 62% cuota HBM, *∼70% del HBM4 Vera Rubin de NVDA* (TrendForce) vs 50% estimado. 16 pilas = 576GB/pila vs HBM3E 8Gb → 2x BW.
Por qué es alcista: Inventario <10 días (primera vez). Obleas 150-200k/mes 3-4x Micron, 50% → HBM4 = DDR5 comprimido → Q4 DRAM +10-15% NAND +15-20%. JPM ve 20%
*Riesgos:* Samsung $8.7B HBM Q3 > SK $7.6B primera vez*
*Estrategia OKX: Largo en apalancamiento HBM, corto en PC DDR.*
Deslinde de responsabilidades: el contenido de OKX Orbit se brinda únicamente con fines informativos. Más información
Respuestas
Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Envía la primera respuesta!
