Orbit Post Sitemap
Paradigm's boss is worried about $ZEC, but I'm only looking at the short term
Matt Huang said the developer fund cannot be cut.
A VC guy is concerned about the governance of privacy coins.
What he said: Voting purely based on coin holdings will weaken $ZEC's monetary trust.
Why it matters: This statement admits that $ZEC's pricing power is not in the hands of retail investors.
The counterintuitive part: Those who shout for decentralization are actually most afraid of pure voting.
Because whales can change the rules with one vote, while retail investors can only follow.
In the short term, this governance discussion does not bring buying pressure.
It brings division, and division means volatility.
I bet this hype won't last more than three days, $ZEC will go back where it should.
The positions of the five-guarantee households are still holding, no comment on direction.
#BTC财库优先股融资升温 $ZEC #OKX百万规划师
1 million USDT allocation: 50% crypto core holdings, 35% tokenized stocks, 15% cash defense.
Crypto core holdings (500,000): ETH 300,000 + BTC 200,000
ETH allocation is higher than BTC, based on clear capital rotation signals. Since September, Ethereum ETFs have seen net inflows of $324 million, surpassing Bitcoin's $307 million; last week ETH ETFs had net inflows of $197 million, while BTC ETFs had net outflows of $463 million. BlackRock's ETH A-shares attracted $149 million in a single day, ranking first. The ETH/BTC ratio formed a golden cross since June, outperforming BTC by about 20% in Q3.
Tokenized stocks (350,000): XNVDA 200,000 + XSPY 150,000
OKX supports 100 tokenized US stocks and ETFs with 24/7 trading, purchasable directly with USDT without opening a separate brokerage account. AI computing power is the biggest current narrative, with Nvidia as the core target; XSPY provides large-cap exposure to balance the high volatility of crypto assets. Tokenized stocks represent price exposure without actual shareholder rights.
Cash (150,000): bullets waiting to be fired
The Federal Reserve just raised rates by 25 basis points, with the dot plot indicating possibly one more hike this year. The 10-year US Treasury yield has surpassed 5%. Regulatory uncertainty has increased after the CLARITY Act was rejected. Cash is not lying flat; it is buying the "right to wait."
Core principle: don't guess the bottom, wait for trend confirmation. Large funds calculate drawdowns first, then returns.
@OKX中文 The $75000 level wasn't lost this time, so it held up decently. In the few minutes after the rate decision, Bitcoin surged then pulled back, but volume didn't follow through, indicating that buyers weren't fully committed. Gold prices probed higher then retreated, as safe-haven and risk positions are being reshuffled. Ethereum is still struggling to keep up, with weaker rebound strength. This kind of "news fully priced in, weak recovery" market is the easiest to lure leveraged traders in before reversing against them. Spot base positions can continue to hold, but short-term positions are best to exit first. In the next day or two, if key levels are repeatedly broken and Ethereum falls below 2300, there will be more downside space. Protect your principal first, then wait for direction. $BTC $ETH #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 At 2:07 AM, someone opened a $ZEC short position
The Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate hike at midnight, bringing the rate to 3.75%.
The tone was hawkish, the dollar strengthened, and risk assets came under pressure.
How this trade came about:
Order placed at 2:07 AM, price 1300, direction short.
At the moment the rate hike was implemented, all assets were hit in a round.
Who took the other side:
Market makers don’t need to guess the direction, they just watch which side’s positions are squeezed.
Short positions clustered in one place, pushing the price up one notch can clear a batch.
$ZEC short position floating loss 59%, $LIT deeply trapped 98%.
These numbers are not caused by market drops, but amplified by leverage.
The person placing the order at midnight thought they were betting on the news, but the timing of the news was already on the schedule.
The order book knew before you did.
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 $ZEC $LIT Last night FOMC: Raised rates, and there may be more in the future
• 16 out of 18 members believe there will be at least one more hike this year
• Year-end rate forecast raised from 3.8% to 4.1%
• Inflation forecast revised upward, 2% target continues to be pushed back
• Walsh's stance is clear: inflation is the priority, market reprices the possibility of further hikes
Logically, this combination should trigger a significant drop, but it did not last night
BTC only dipped to around 75K before quickly recovering, ETH and SOL also did not show trend-level breakdowns. Reason: the market is actually trading not on last night's 25bp hike, but on the continuously heating rate hike expectations over the past two weeks. After CPI and PPI releases, the September hike has already been priced in by most funds; the large-scale liquidation on the day the infrastructure bill vote failed also released some leverage risk in advance
Now it is the pricing digestion after the decision, whether a new trend starts still needs observation
$BTC
Support: 75K, 74K, 72K long liquidation zones
Resistance: 77.4–77.8 (main short liquidation zone)
$ETH Watch the 2500 level
Support: 2370, 2280–2300
Resistance: 2480–2500, 2580–2610
$SOL 95 was not broken by FOMC, still maintaining repair structure.
Support: 94.5–95, 90–92
Resistance: 100–101.5, 105–106
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 The actual protocol revenue is only a few thousand dollars a day, yet it dares to claim a market cap of 30 billion?Sisters, this is so strange.
This market is really strange.
Now it suddenly feels peaceful, like the bull market has just arrived all of a sudden!
Right now, the whole internet is saying that the interest rate hike is as expected, and it’s a positive.
So the entire crypto circle is rising.
Mainstream coins are up, altcoins are also up.
Especially $ZEC, leading the way, carrying the banner alone, bringing the crypto circle up together.
This whole cheerful market feels so strange to me.
ZEC today surged wildly from 1127, reaching a high of 1398.99.
SAR at 1359 is still being trampled underfoot, MACD has a golden cross above the zero line, looking like it’s about to shoot to the sky.
The entire market is celebrating wildly, as if the interest rate hike really turned into a huge positive.
Short-term sentiment definitely needs to be vented, I can understand that.
But precisely because the whole market is showing such positive signs, I feel that’s the biggest problem.
Everyone seems to have suddenly forgotten about the next interest rate hike, and is all crazily speculating on this one negative turning into an expected positive.
The next interest rate hike is at the end of October, only 30 days away from now.
30 days, not too long, not too short.
But I always feel this rally might not be as solid as it looks on the surface, the chance of it being a bluff is quite high.
The manipulators are now using the "as expected" excuse to hype sentiment to the highest point; once they’ve sold off enough, who will care about when the next rate hike is?
When October approaches and the rate hike expectations come back to the forefront, the market might show a different face again.
That’s why I feel very conflicted looking at this market now.
Holding short positions, watching it surge upwards, the unrealized losses really sting, and my palms have never stopped sweating.
But precisely because I’m holding shorts, I pay extra attention to that sword hanging over our heads in October.
The Fed’s next rate hike expectation hasn’t disappeared, it’s just been covered by short-term sentiment.
Once this wave of sentiment recedes, those coins pulled up by sentiment might fall faster than anyone else.
$BTC
$ETH
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 🔥 $BTC / $ONDO / $TAO | THREE DIFFERENT FUTURES
$BTC → optimizing scarcity and trust without intermediaries.
$ONDO → bringing traditional financial assets onto the blockchain.
$TAO → building a market where AI capabilities can be valued and coordinated on-chain.
The commonality is not in the technology, but in what each network aims to become.
$BTC aims for money and reserve assets. $ONDO aims for financial assets. $TAO aims for a market for machine intelligence.
#FedFirst25BpsHikeSince23 Saylor's STRC hasn't returned to the $100 peg for 120 days. For over four months, it hasn't even touched parity for a single second.
Why can't it pull back? Mainly because the selling pressure is too strong. Once the confidence gap starts, it's very hard for the company to manage. So recently, instead of buying BTC, they have been spending money to buy back STRC, which is a helpless move.
Because STRC still has nearly a 12% high dividend, this is a cash cost that Strategy must continuously bear to maintain this financing machine. It's like a leaking roof facing heavy rain; the bill didn't pass, and as a result, Strategy dropped 7% that day—really fatal.
The market is starting to refuse to give him money at the price Saylor wants.
This means that it will be even harder for him to finance at a low cost going forward, and the financing model that supports one of BTC's important buy-side players is out of the game.
In plain terms, new buyers, especially large capital buyers, are starting to decrease. This is exactly what those on Wall Street watching him hope for because they can better control the market and find opportunities to pick up subsequent chips. Whether they want to take meat from his bowl depends on whether he survives or not.
Of course, institutions don't want him to fail, especially those who invested, but they definitely don't want to be the ones ultimately backing Saylor's machine.
To put it bluntly, at this stage, institutions want returns; later on, they might want BTC or his life.Illusion of Unrealized Gains Ownership: Most Profits in Crypto Are Just Paper Visitors
Many people make big short-term gains on paper during a bull market but end up barely keeping any profits. This is not entirely due to wrong market judgment but because they fall into the psychological trap of the illusion of unrealized gains ownership.
Simply put: unrealized gains on paper are just temporary numbers given by the market. Until you close the position and lock in profits, they don’t truly belong to you. However, our brain prematurely assumes these profits as our own assets.
The crypto market is highly volatile, which infinitely amplifies this illusion.
Two typical manifestations:
1. After unrealized gains expand, the mindset becomes overconfident. The subconscious thinks this part is "free money," leading to relaxed risk control, increased positions, frequent contract trading, chasing high-risk coins, feeling it doesn’t matter if unrealized gains are lost, and eventually profits are given back, damaging even the principal.
2. Conversely, even a slight pullback in unrealized gains causes extreme pain. It’s not relief that there are still profits but distress that "money that should have been earned has decreased," being held hostage by the peak on paper, with operations completely driven by emotions—either taking profits too early and missing the trend or unwilling to reduce positions and enduring the full roller coaster.
The essence of the illusion of unrealized gains ownership is confusing paper numbers with actual wealth. Prices change instantly, and as long as you’re still in the market, unrealized gains can be taken back by the market at any time.
What the market gives, it can also take away at any time. The end goal of trading is not how high your unrealized gains are on paper but how much you can ultimately keep.
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 #10年期美债收益率突破5% $BTC $ETH $ZEC Is good looks really the number one productivity in the crypto world? Laughing mouse
Yesterday, the ARC chain launch really whetted everyone's appetite. Riding on the residual heat from the Robinhood chain, everyone rushed into ARC like grabbing money. Before launch, cross-chain USDC even traded at double premiums.
But today, as soon as the founder appeared live, it crashed directly 🌚 This is really judging a book by its cover! It stunned the market.
The filter broke, triggering sell-offs.
Everyone rushed in hoping for an initial wealth effect, but the founder's live appearance shattered the perfect illusion, becoming the fuse for profit-taking at the high point.
Arbitrage hot money lacks consensus.
All who rushed in were short-term funds looking for a quick hit and run; even a slight disturbance triggered a stampede.
However, this crash washed out speculative hot money, which is actually a good thing. After all, ARC is an institutional-grade public chain built by Circle, using USDC as gas and following a compliant route.
Once the emotional trash settles, it will likely shift to RWA and institutional-grade DeFi. Truly self-sustaining projects will be easier to emerge after the shakeout.
DYOR Honestly, I first came across $BTC while scrolling through videos.
At that time, I felt it was far from me.
Later, feeling tempted, I bought a little.
After buying, I regretted it because I just couldn’t hold on.
Every day when I open my eyes, the first thing I check is the price changes, just like clocking in at work.
When it rises, I want to add more; when it falls, I want to play dead.
Once I woke up in the middle of the night and even checked my phone, then went to work the next day like a sleepwalker.
Later, I got into $ETH, but the fees discouraged me several times.
It wasn’t losing money on the price, but every transaction hurt.
Then I heard people hype $SOL, so I followed with a small amount.
It’s really fast, and my heartbeat was really fast too.
If I don’t check for a few minutes, the numbers can change completely.
During that time, I was too lazy to go out when friends invited me to eat.
When my family asked what I was busy with, I was embarrassed to say.
When someone in the group shouted trading signals, I actually believed them at first.
Later I realized the louder they shouted, the easier it was to lead people astray.
Just glance at those showing off profits; who knows what’s really going on behind the scenes.
Now I only play with spare money, not affecting my meals or sleep.
No borrowing, no heavy positions, no following the crowd.
If there’s profit, take a little and run; don’t always think about getting rich in one bite.
If you lose, don’t rush to recover; the more anxious you are, the messier it gets.
There’s a market every day, but if the principal is gone, there’s really nothing left to play with.
After all this, my biggest takeaway is not to get carried away.
Being able to sleep soundly is better than any get-rich-quick story. #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议
#AI发展焦虑升温，监管讨论升级 Volatility bursts are concentrated during the opening hours of the Korean and US stock markets. In the opening phase, bulls and bears clash repeatedly, spanning the largest timeframes, with the market often going through multiple rounds of declines and rebounds, frequently completing two full major cycles in one go; by the afternoon, market momentum fades, and the intensity of volatility noticeably weakens. The intense tug-of-war seen with SanDisk yesterday was a rare extreme event and should not be considered the norm.
The real opportunities to achieve substantial profits lie hidden within these continuous major cycle structures in the early session. Understanding the timeframe of the cycles is key to holding positions.
Today's trade is a typical example of a disconnect between cognition and execution. I anticipated a rally in the Korean market, bought at the bottom, but when floating profits reached 20, 15, and 10 points, I did not choose to exit. After the market entered a consolidation phase, patience ran out, and in the end, I only made 2 points before hastily closing the position.
Root cause of the review: Short-term funds inherently operate on very short cycles and are not suited to forcibly holding long-term positions. In a choppy market, stubbornly holding on can easily lead to giving back all floating profits.
A better approach is to proactively exit at target levels, pocket profits, and then wait for the next low to re-enter. Capturing cycles in batches leads to a steadier holding mentality and makes it easier to hold the next wave of the market.
Core insights:
1. Prioritize capturing major cycle moves during the opening session; volatility weakens in the afternoon and the quality of opportunities declines.
2. Distinguish the nature of your capital; short-term funds should not forcibly gamble on long cycles or expect to capture an entire move in one trade.
3. When the level is reached, exit as planned. After taking profits, wait for the next cycle entry point to re-enter; this is far safer than stubbornly enduring consolidation.THREE POSITIONS — THREE MISSIONS 🎯
After the shakeout, I don’t see $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL as identical plays anymore.
🟠 $BTC — $76.15K | DEFENSE
The job is simple: hold the base and protect the portfolio structure.
🔵 $ETH — $2.42K | GROWTH
Needs to reclaim the MA20 at $2.46K to show stronger momentum.
🟣 $SOL — $98.98 | OFFENSE
Higher volatility. Currently testing the MA20 at $99.66 — reclaiming it could bring the uptrend back into focus.
Three positions.
Three missions.
$BTC protects Slow is fast, but only when the premise is positive expectation.
1. Heavy positions destroy your trading rhythm
Heavy positions make you fear both profit retracement and liquidation. Once emotions take over, stop-losses and take-profits become meaningless.
You cut winners too quickly because you’re afraid of losing them, while stubbornly holding losers because you don’t want to accept the loss.
One bad trade can wipe out ten small wins.#DailyOrbit 1-hour chart, the core change in today's market is the downward shift of the oscillation center. Today's CVD has turned downward continuously, indicating that the capital attitude has shifted from wait-and-see to actively exiting. During the decline, the open interest briefly rose, then quickly fell back. The decline involves some traders trying to bottom-fish by going long at low levels, while shorts add positions accordingly. The divergence between bulls and bears widens, and the price continues to probe lower. The short-term long positions from bottom-fishing trigger stop-losses and are passively closed, leading to a contraction in open interest. Essentially, the newly added bottom-fishing longs today were quickly stopped out and shaken off; there is no long-term capital adding positions against the trend, nor is there large-scale continuous short position accumulation. The decline relies more on the resonance of long stop-losses plus continuous active selling. If the price continues to make new lows, with CVD maintaining a downward trend and OI continuing to shrink, it indicates that long stop-loss positions are still being cleared and the downward momentum continues. There is no clear support below, mainly sweeping liquidity at the bottom. If the price makes new lows again but CVD no longer synchronizes with new lows (capital bottom divergence), and OI quickly and sharply falls, it means stop-loss positions are basically cleared, which may lead to a corrective rebound driven by short covering. However, this is only a rebound; the resistance after breaking above is heavy, making it difficult to return directly to the previous oscillation range. For a strong price rebound, the price must retake the broken support level, and CVD must turn upward with new active buying entering, which could pull the market back into range trading. Currently, the probability of this is low. #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 SYN current price is 0.2047, the market is moving quite sluggishly. The news is all noise, none of it is actionable, so just focus on the naked candlesticks and order book. On the 4-hour chart, volume continues to shrink, with a cluster of sell orders pressing down between 0.21 and 0.215. Several spikes have been pushed back. On the downside, there are support orders between 0.198 and 0.20, but the depth is average; if it really crashes, it might not hold. Funding rate is slightly negative, bulls have no premium, and bears haven't dared to heavily short. It's a typical consolidation waiting for a breakout.
Made a cup of tea, the tea leaves settled at the bottom of the cup, no rush to drink. Watching those few hundred-dollar orders in the order book being canceled and re-posted, grinding back and forth.
In terms of trading, do not chase. Light short positions near 0.211 on the rebound, set stop loss at 0.216, if broken, accept the loss. Target first at 0.199, reduce half the position there, the rest look to 0.193. If it breaks below 0.198 with volume, don't catch the falling knife; wait for a rebound to 0.202 before shorting. Long positions are not considered for now unless it stabilizes above 0.218 with volume picking up, then reconsider. At this position, just wait for it to choose a direction itself; whoever moves first gets hit.
$SNX
#贝森特听证释放多重信号
@OKX星球 [Pharaoh's Market Watch]
Is the US about to lock Bitcoin and crypto taxes together in a safe? Pharaoh says directly, the House of Representatives' two committees worked overnight, one line managing money, the other managing coins; this script is even more orderly than Pharaoh's pyramids.
First, look at the tax line. The House Ways and Means Committee overwhelmingly passed the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act by 38 to 5, setting a rule for crypto transactions—crypto transactions with network or transaction fees not exceeding $10 are tax-exempt. In other words, from now on, when you buy a coffee or transfer money, you no longer need to fill out a bunch of tax forms for a few dollars of fees.
Next, look at the reserve line. The Financial Services Committee passed the American Reserve Modernization Act by 28 to 21, aiming to codify the "strategic Bitcoin reserve" that Trump previously established by executive order into law, requiring the Treasury to build a "secure Bitcoin storage facility" to lock up Bitcoin seized by the government.
But Pharaoh has to pour cold water on this. The probability of the reserve act passing is only about 6%, and after September 17, lawmakers will go on recess.
What does this mean for Bitcoin? In the short term, it's a small emotional support, but don't expect it to pull 75,000 back to 80,000. The real signal is that the US is moving crypto assets from the "gray area" into the "fiscal system." Taxes are being clarified, reserves are being legislated, both legs moving together, the direction is already clear. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 今天币圈的走势，很多人一醒来就懵了。 比特币回调，以太坊跟跌，SOL、SUI 等热门公链跌幅更明显，社区里又开始出现一句熟悉的话：“牛市是不是结束了？” 我今天把盘面看了一遍，反而觉得，现在很多人都看错了重点。 真正影响今天行情的，并不是技术面，而是监管预期和美联储预期同时发生变化。 美国参议院今天没有推进 CLARITY 加密监管法案，这意味着市场原本期待的监管明朗化被按下暂停键。消息出来之后，加密市场风险偏好明显下降，BTC、ETH 和 Coinbase 等加密概念资产都出现回落。 很多人把这理解成利空。 但我认为，这属于短期情绪利空，不等于长期趋势利空。 为什么这么说？ 因为这一轮牛市真正推动市场上涨的核心，并没有改变：机构资金持续进入、ETF 资金仍然存在、越来越多传统金融机构开始布局加密资产。监管消息会影响几天甚至几周的情绪，却不会一夜之间改变资金长期配置的方向。 另外，还有一件大事马上到来——美联储议息会议。 现在市场已经开始提前交易预期，比结果更重要的是鲍威尔讲话释放什么信号。如果讲话偏鸽派，风险资产可能重新获得资金关注；如果偏鹰派，短期波动可能继续放大。 ### 我今天#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 Bro, the CLARITY Act failed, and many thought Washington's crypto regulation was going to stall again. But actually, they made a diversion and pushed through two waves of special legislation today.
The first wave was the House Appropriations Committee passing H.R.10357, the "Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act," with 38 votes in favor and 5 against. The core is to clarify tax rules for crypto income, asset transfers, mining, staking, and broker reporting. Previously, tax reporting was chaotic and arbitrary; now there are clear rules of the game. Big compliant funds fear tax uncertainty the most, so once this act is implemented, it will give institutions a big reassurance to enter the market.
The second wave was the Financial Services Committee advancing H.R.8957, the "American Reserve Modernization Act," with 28 votes in favor and 21 against. It proposes to include strategic Bitcoin reserves in the federal legal framework, with the government's BTC holdings to be retained for at least 20 years in principle, and to study budget-neutral ways to increase holdings. In other words, the Treasury's Bitcoin is upgraded to a national strategic asset, locked for 20 years without dumping, which directly boosts long-term expectations.
My judgment is clear: CLARITY is blocked, but these two tracks bypass the main battlefield to launch an assault. Taxation resolves institutional compliance anxiety, reserves solve the state's endorsement issue, and pushing both together forcibly drags crypto into the mainstream financial system. $BTC $ETH $ZEC Why does it still rise after a 25 basis point rate hike?
Really amazed.
My ETH short position
Got stopped out at 2432
Lost 6.51U
It hurts just looking at it
Clearly, a rate hike is bearish
But the market didn't fall, it rose instead
$BTC is still at 76451 now
Up nearly 1%
$ETH at 2436
Up nearly 2%
Can't figure it out
The rate hike landing means the bearish news is fully priced in
The market had already priced in the rate hike in advance
Always shouting "wolf is coming"
When the wolf really comes
Nothing happens
Funds were waiting for this day
News landing
Uncertainty eliminated
Buyers rush in
Plus short squeeze
Before the rate hike, many were shorting
Waiting for the news to drop and crush the market
But the market didn't fall
Shorts panicked
Closed positions and fled
Closing shorts means buying
The more they close, the higher it goes
The higher it goes, the more they close
A wave of short squeeze
Directly pushed the price up
And then there's that old man Powell
Says rate hike
But hints in his speech
That there might not be more hikes
The market hears this
Wow
No more hikes
What are we waiting for?
Charge straight up
My loss on this trade is not undeserved
I got the direction wrong
Logic didn't keep up
The rate hike landing is not the end
It's the beginning
I thought the bearish news would crush the market
But the bearish news fully priced in turned into bullish
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 Those who fell from $XRP at 1.4914 are all staring blankly at the 1.30 mark today.
In the short term, it was forcibly pulled back from 1.2461 to 1.30, looking like a lifeline. Looking closely at the 4-hour chart, although the KDJ indicator quietly formed a golden cross at the bottom, the J value reached 31, and RSI climbed back to 43.60, the overhead SAR (1.363) and EMA (1.35) are pressing down like an iron fortress. There is a rebound, but the strength for a reversal is still far from enough.
News about the Malaysian market opening is flying around, but for a market of this scale, such small stories can't really drive genuine buying power. This current rebound to positive territory is more of an oversold bounce brought about by short sellers taking profits.
The 1.30 level is a precarious position—chasing higher risks getting stuck halfway up the mountain, while shorting risks being directly pierced by a rebound. Are you planning to wait until it truly holds above 1.35 before making a move, or are you ready to gamble on the right side at this level? Are your current positions prepared to handle the back-and-forth spikes?UniHexa has been expanding the whitelist for almost 3 days.
I looked at the current data and will give the conclusion directly:
Trading is possible, but the market hasn't taken off yet.
Currently, there are only 3 Runes trading pairs.
The 24-hour trading volume of $DOG is 0.00649642 BTC, about $492, and the market cap displayed on the page is close to $95M.
The 24-hour trading volumes for MIM and UNCOMMON•GOODS are both zero.
The recent $DOG trades in the screenshot are only about $7 to $10 each.
This indicates that the product process has indeed been completed and real trades have started to appear.
However, problems are also obvious.
An asset with a market cap close to $95M only has a few hundred dollars in daily trading volume. This liquidity means retail investors can buy in easily, but when they want to sell, there may not be buyers.
UniHexa can at most be considered to have completed the first step; it cannot yet be said that the market has been established.
Few whitelist users and few trading pairs are objective reasons. Going forward, more users need to be opened up, more assets added, and project teams and market-making funds brought in.
Those on the whitelist can test with small amounts; heavy positions are unnecessary.
Next, I will only watch three data points:
When BRC-20 goes live, how many trading pairs can be added, and whether the 24-hour trading volume can continue to grow.
I agree with the direction, but the data still needs to keep running.
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 $SNDK 2x long SanDisk ETF just launched, but the main player is lying flat at 1536 pretending to be dead. I can hear the scheming all the way from Mars.
It slid down from 1806 to 1507, with five moving averages twisted into a dead knot around 1536, and the SAR coldly watching from above 1568. The J value is 46, RSI is stuck in the middle zone between 39 and 44. No violent shakeout, just a dull knife cutting a little flesh from you every day.
The most ironic thing is, even though it's clearly a downtrend, they insist on pushing a 2x leveraged long tool. This isn’t supplying you with ammo to go long; it’s clearly afraid retail investors won’t die fast enough, so it hands you an accelerator. Those shouting "bottom fishing" above 1500 and rushing into leveraged ETFs will likely feel what a double whammy means.
The previous low at 1507 is already looming. Facing this "fellow villager, don’t leave, add leverage and then go" trick, are you ready to catch the flying knife, or are you planning to watch how far it can fall?I closed my long position and reversed to short $ZEC, then got liquidated. The mechanism of this trade is actually straightforward: the direction switch happens at the peak of sentiment.
Closing the long means the original buying pressure disappears, and reversing to short is like adding leverage to the decline. As long as the price moves up a bit more, the short margin can't hold. Liquidation is not a wrong judgment; it's a mismatch between position size and volatility.
The next link in the chain is that liquidation itself pushes the price up, consuming more shorts. Whoever is passive becomes the fuel.
What I want to wait for is the funding rate turning negative while the price doesn't drop. Only then does it indicate that the shorts are genuine demand, not just sentiment.
#OKX预言家：来星球玩预测 $ZEC #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进
Is the SOL chain cooling off? Can you still get in on the USELESS pullback?
First, let's look at the sentiment on the SOL chain. Honestly, it's a bit cold. Bearish sentiment on social media for SOL has just hit its highest level since 2026, and trading volume has shrunk to a low. The price has dropped from 110 back to around 95-97, RSI has fallen to just above 40—not oversold but not looking good either. However, one detail is worth noting: ETFs have had net inflows for nine consecutive weeks, absorbing over $200 million in a month, while exchanges have seen a net outflow of 3 million SOL. In plain terms—retail investors are scared, institutions are buying.
Now about USELESS. This thing started at 0.04 at the end of August, surged to 0.26 in early September, more than 6x, then pulled back to test support around 0.20. The question now isn’t "does it have utility"—it doesn’t; buying it is buying meme spread power. The key points are: whether 0.20 holds, and whether there’s enough volume to push through the 0.33 resistance. Futures data is interesting—whales are net long, but small retail accounts are net short, indicating smart money is still betting on a rebound.
SOL chain sentiment is cold but institutions are supporting the bottom; the 0.20 level on USELESS is the short-term lifeline. If you want to go long, set your stop loss just below 0.19—don’t hold if it breaks. Meme coins are all about exiting before the music stops $USELESS #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点
🔥 After three years, the Federal Reserve has finally pulled the trigger, raising rates by 25 basis points.
The boot has dropped, but this is not the grand finale; it's the opening of a new script.
In the past few months, the market has been betting on "whether there will be a hike or not." Now that the answer is out, the real point of contention is— is this a one-time "hawkish reassurance," or the start of a new rate hike cycle?
For the crypto space, this is a real drain. U.S. Treasury yields were already stuck around 5% and couldn't go lower; now with higher funding costs, the valuation ceiling for risk assets has been pushed down further. BTC has been fluctuating between 75,000 and 76,000 these days, already pricing in this expectation.
The next script is basically one of two scenarios:
If Powell or Waller softens their tone at the press conference, hinting "this is the only hike and then a wait-and-see," today's drop might actually create a golden pit signaling the worst is over.
But if they hold firm on inflation, implying more hikes ahead, BTC will likely need to find support around 73,000 or even lower.
Don't rush to bet on direction; such macro-level volatility can wipe out futures traders with a single spike.
If you hold spot, just watch the show and don't add positions. If you're out of the market, don't rush to catch the falling knife; wait until the market fully digests the Fed's cards before making a move.
Right now, it's not about who bottoms out fastest, but who can endure. With this rate hike landing, do you think BTC has bottomed or will continue to drift down? $BTC Good afternoon, BTC is currently quoted at 76,486, up slightly by 0.92% in 24 hours. The intraday low touched 75,055 but was firmly pulled back, temporarily stabilizing around 75,000 in the short term.
Looking at the 3-day moving average, the long-term structure is quite interesting. Previously, it dropped sharply from the high of 116,400 down to 57,809, a brutal deleveraging and valuation kill-off. Then it started to rebound from 57,809, climbing all the way to around 82,285 by the end of August. After this rebound, it has now entered a consolidation phase, with 76,000 being the central battleground for bulls and bears.
What’s really worth noting is that the price is still some distance from the lower 3-day moving average midline (71,430), indicating the long-term cycle hasn’t fully turned bearish but is more like resting within a wide oscillation box. The Bollinger Bands are wide apart, with the upper band at 85,580 and the lower band at 57,280, a typical "large volatility, large range" structure.
After the bearish impact of last night’s FOMC rate hike landed, BTC didn’t crash but instead rebounded slightly, showing that the panic from the previous drop from 82,285 to 75,000 has mostly been released. Going forward, it’s likely to maintain this large range oscillation, with 76,000 as the short-term defense line; a break below would look toward 74,000. To truly reverse, volume must increase and hold above 78,000.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 #Last night the Fed raised rates, yet the crypto market rose; the core reason is that the negative news was priced in early, the boot has dropped, and after the negative is fully out, a rebound occurs.
This rate hike was within market expectations, and the press conference did not release a more hawkish stance, leading shorts to take profits collectively and driving the market up.
⚠️Key point: This is only a short-term sentiment recovery, not a trend reversal. The dot plot suggests there may still be rate hikes within the year, and liquidity remains tight.
Subsequent operation ideas:
✅ Do not chase highs, avoid chasing this rebound to go long
✅ Do not heavily short; shorts were just flushed out, so volatility will increase
✅ Keep positions light, refuse high leverage on one-sided trades, wait for resistance levels to find opportunities
Remember: The market focuses not on the news itself but on the expectation gap; if it meets expectations, it tends to settle and move in the opposite direction.
Avoid heavy position betting on direction before decisions; spikes and shakeouts can be very damaging.
Personal review only, not trading advice; contract trading is extremely risky, please do not follow blindly.
$ETH #美联储Don't guess the bottom; wait for trend confirmation before getting on board
Sharing a "Moon Rule" that I use both in trading and life: never guess the bottom, wait for trend confirmation before starting.
When I first entered the circle, I always wanted to buy at the lowest point. Seeing a 30% drop, I thought "this is the bottom," rushed in, only to see it drop another 30%. After repeating this several times, I realized—the bottom is only known in hindsight; all "bottom fishing" beforehand is gambling.
Later, I applied this rule to trading: wait for the price to stand above key moving averages, wait for volume breakout confirmation, wait for the trend to develop before entering. Although you might miss the initial spike, the main body of the move is still substantial. This year, when BTC started from $63,000, I didn't buy at the lowest point, but got on board after confirming the breakout at $68,000, and still caught the $80,000 rally.
This rule applies to life as well. Don't guess which path suits you best; start running, and the direction will become clear as you go. Don't guess when the best timing is; just start doing things, and opportunities will naturally come.
The bottom can't be guessed; the trend must be waited for. Being slow for a moment actually makes you faster.
Inviting my workout partner to join @鬼才白夜
#与OKX向月而行
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $USELESS USELESS, this trade is dripping with profit.
10x long position, opened at 0.23074, closed at 0.25251, return +93.44%.
Why dare to do it?
The name is "USELESS," ironically mocking those trash coins that boast about being "useful" every day. Listed on Upbit with a 12% pump, Hyperliquid launched perpetual contracts, Bonk Guy called the trade, whales flowed in nearly 12 million USD in a month. This is not air, it's capital rushing in. Entered at 0.23, exited at 0.25, capturing the fattest segment.
What's the current market situation?
Current price 0.2563, 24h volume 121 million, ranked 6th in popularity. But RSI6 is at 92.67, seriously overbought. 0.25767 is today's high; if it can't break through, it's a double top; if it breaks through, look for 0.28-0.30.
Long and short side suggestions:
Long: Volume surge and hold at 0.24-0.25, lightly chase longs, target 0.27-0.28, stop loss below 0.23. Chase longs above RSI 90, licking the blade.
Short: Volume surge with stagnation or long upper shadow at 0.26-0.27, decisively short, target 0.23-0.24, stop loss above 0.28. Overbought + 47% whale control, dumping is ruthless.
My rules:
If the trend is intact, hold tight.
Add positions on volume breakout.
Defend on high-level stagnation.
Never hesitate if key support breaks.
This round of USELESS is already secured profit.That "insider whale" Garrett Jin, short on ZEC, has an unrealized loss of $25.85 million and is still adding to his position.
He started shorting $ZEC at around $400, shorting more as the price rose.
Last night, he added 5,000 more at $1,252. He now holds 37,760 ZEC short positions, with a nominal value of $50.99 million, an unrealized loss of $25.85 million, and a liquidation price of $2,631. From shorting at 400 to 1,400, he has lost about 25 times his initial position, yet he keeps going.
At the same time, someone is acting in the opposite direction. A whale has withdrawn a total of 15,300 ZEC from Binance, OKX, and Kraken, worth $17.92 million. Withdrawals are not deposits; they move chips off exchanges, which doesn’t look like preparation to sell.
In the past 24 hours, the entire network has liquidated $346 million, with $196 million from shorts, $46 million more than longs. ZEC shorts are being gradually cleared out. Garrett Jin is less than $900 away from his liquidation price of $2,631.
He is betting that ZEC will fall back. But ZEC went from 400 to 1,400 over three months. Every time he adds to his position, he’s betting "this time is the top."
Continuing to short from 400 to 1,400 is not trading; it’s obsession. He is gambling on a judgment that has already lost $25.85 million. I don’t know if ZEC can fall back to 400, but short liquidations are still ongoing, and he might be the next to be cleared.The crucial Clarity Act did not pass—could this be the start of catastrophic hell? While the reality is not "catastrophic," the 50-50 deadlock is still far from the 60-vote threshold, and the regulatory optimism falling through has indeed dampened the market. Across the entire network, BTC is stuck around the $75,900 mark, with the first support at $75,000-$75,500 hanging by a thread. The blockage of CLARITY combined with Middle East oil prices pushing inflation higher (Brent crude hitting 105) has pushed the macro risk tolerance down to freezing point.
Bitcoin, as the ballast stone, is the first to absorb selling pressure. Institutional optimistic positioning is temporarily on hold; although the fundamentals remain, independent gains before the FOMC are unlikely. Ethereum is more sensitive to policy, facing dual pressure from rate hikes and regulatory uncertainty, with significant retracements and sharp short-term losses. As for sentiment coins like DOGE, panic has spread rapidly, causing quick capital flight and wild volatility.
Fortunately, the bill only failed procedurally and is not dead yet, though short-term progress is unlikely. Looking back at recent painful days: ZEC surged to 1394 with high leverage washouts, 40x leverage lost 310,000 in one hour, SOL is under pressure, and 100x long positions are bleeding at the edge—all confirming that "the hotter the market, the slower you should move." Tonight's Federal Reserve decision is the biggest variable; a dovish Wash would mean all bad news is priced in, while a hawkish stance will test key levels.
The tug-of-war between bulls and bears is intense—don’t get reckless and bet heavily on one side. Trading is about longevity: don’t hold, don’t add, don’t fantasize. Hold your base positions for the long term, watch high leverage trades carefully, and move sparingly. #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 The real cost of funding rate arbitrage is higher than you think
When you see the funding rate continuously positive, your first reaction is to short to earn the funding fee. Theoretically, it sounds great—long spot, short futures, and the funding fee is pure profit.
But in practice, you'll find the costs are higher than expected.
First, there are fees on both sides. Buying spot and opening futures positions both incur costs, and since the funding rate can flip at any time, if your holding period isn't long enough, the earned funding fee might not cover the opening and closing fees.
Second, slippage. Opening two positions simultaneously means two trades, each with slippage. When funding rates are extreme, volatility is usually at its peak, which amplifies slippage.
Finally, capital occupation. Both spot longs and futures margin occupy your capital simultaneously, so your actual annualized return will be much lower than the percentage shown by the funding rate.
Funding rate arbitrage is not impossible, but you need to precisely calculate all costs instead of just looking at the funding rate numbers.$TRUMP's capital momentum is still cooling down. About $480,000 was liquidated in 24 hours, with $420,000 long positions and $63,000 short positions; the largest single liquidation was only $24,000. Globally, 283 people were liquidated, and the market status is marked as "normal"—this indicates that leverage is no longer crowded, and it's not a concentrated liquidation but a quiet withdrawal of positions.
The price has fallen from $3.68 to $1.97, with the previous 7000% increase shrinking to 2000%, a 24-hour volatility of 5.66%, and trading volume under $100 million.
The narrative still has some warmth, but incremental funds have not taken over; the market seems to be shifting from emotion-driven to stock game.
The market is awaiting progress on the CLARITY Act: passing it could reignite expectations, while failure to pass would leave a lack of new pricing anchors.
In terms of impact, thinner liquidity will amplify the impact of large single orders; small amounts of capital can move prices and can also suddenly retract without news.
The risk is that the outcome of the act is unpredictable, and low-volume rebounds are prone to distortion; the cost zone in the past month may not be stable.
If trading volume rises above $100 million again and long-short liquidations return to balance, it can be considered a condition for capital inflow observation. Please make independent judgments and control your positions. #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点
The boot has finally dropped: the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 25 basis points for the first time in three years. The rate hike itself was expected and already priced in by the market. What really sends chills down the spine is the dot plot—16 out of 18 participants expect at least one more hike before the end of 2026. What does this mean? It shows this is not a "one-off" adjustment but the start of a new tightening cycle! The phrase from Powell at the press conference, "inflation is too high and too persistent," firmly set a hawkish tone.
Interestingly, the reaction in the US stock market was sharp: the Dow dropped 600 points just before the close, with the S&P and Nasdaq plunging as well. Once the risk-free rate breaks above 5%, overvalued and high-beta assets are definitely the first to get hit. Moreover, the White House is publicly pressuring for rate cuts, directly opposing the Fed's hiking path—this drama is far from over.
But strangely, BTC rose slightly by 0.87%, and ETH even gained 1.84%. Despite the rate hike being negative news, the crypto market didn’t crash? My understanding is that the market had already fallen sharply in the previous days, sliding from 79,600 down to 74,955; panic sellers had already exited, so today’s move is a typical "sell the rumor, buy the news" rebound. Plus, the crypto market itself was oversold, so after the hike landed, funds dared to enter and buy the dip.
However, don’t be fooled by these one or two small green candles. If the tightening cycle truly restarts, with the 10-year Treasury yield continuing to surge, the tough times for risk assets are still ahead.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #美联储三年来首次加息25个基点 #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进
Many people wonder: The Fed clearly raised rates by 25bp, so why didn’t the crypto market fall but instead rallied?
The core explanation in one sentence: The rate hike was already priced in by the market in advance, so it’s the boot dropping, the bad news is fully out.
1. Before the decision, the market had already priced in over 90% probability of a 25 basis point hike. The market had already dropped a few days earlier as funds digested this negative news.
2. The key is to look at the statements from the press conference: this is a one-time preventive rate hike, with no indication of starting a continuous rate hike cycle. What the market fears most is not this single hike, but continuous hikes afterward.
3. Short sellers took profits and bottom-fishing funds entered, causing a rebound, commonly known as short covering.
4. Additionally, panic from the failure of the CLARITY Act vote had already been released in advance. Two major macro negative factors landed at once, uncertainty disappeared, and risk assets rebounded.
⚠️ But note: this is only a short-term rebound and does not indicate a trend reversal.
If inflation rebounds again later and the Fed continues to hawkishly tighten, the market will come under pressure again at any time. High-leverage contracts must be handled carefully; rebounds are the easiest time for shorts to be liquidated and for longs to get trapped.
This is only a personal market review record and does not constitute any trading advice. Contract trading carries extremely high risk; please do not follow blindly. $BTC $ZEC What if $ZEC is still nowhere near its real potential? 👀
Back in 2017, $BCH reached around 30% of Bitcoin’s market cap, while $LTC touched roughly 8%—both riding the “better version of Bitcoin” narrative.
Today, $ZEC is sitting at just 1.6% of BTC’s market cap.
If it reaches even 15–20%, the math gets interesting:
At $100K BTC, that would put $ZEC around $15K–$20K.
Five-digit Zcash. 🖤
I’m saying this is a scenario the market may be underestimating.
#DailyOrbit 9月11日CPI出来后，黄金从4398回落，我之前写过"空仓观察，等站上EMA50 + 资金流转正"。对照国际金价（现货伦敦金）更新一下现在的状态。 ## 价格：回到4291，三线全跌破 今天（9-17）国际金价（现货伦敦金 XAUUSD）在 4291 美元/盎司附近。把均线拉出来：EMA20 在 4386、EMA50 在 4356、EMA200 在 4305——现价三条线全在下方。 和上周比，最大的变化是 EMA200 也跌破了。之前价格还站在年线（EMA200）上方、靠长线托着，现在三线空头排列，长线多头结构也松动了。今年区间 3919 到 5550，现处在约 23% 分位，离年初高位回撤约 23%。 ## 新变量：连长线都破了，更不能把反弹当反转 有意思的是另一面：价格跌回今年下四分位、连 EMA200 都跌破，说明盘面现在是全线偏弱，不是"长线稳、短线调"那种温和结构。 但这恰恰最容易骗人。越是"跌破所有均线"的走势，越不能看到一根阳线就当反转——短线没放量站回 EMA50、且资金流没转正，这种形态通常是下跌中继的存量博弈，不是新钱主动抄底。盘面没看到增量看多。 ## 资金流：CLARITY has fallen. 49:50, 11 votes short.
But Washington hasn't stopped.
Point 1: Let's look at the numbers first.
In the early hours of September 16, the Senate procedural vote on the CLARITY bill ended—49 in favor, 50 against. It takes 60 votes to invoke cloture and end debate, so it missed by a full 11 votes.
On Polymarket, the probability of CLARITY becoming law by the end of 2026 plummeted from over 30% a week ago to 5%. The total market trading volume was $18.75 million, all wiped out.
Bitcoin dropped more than 4% intraday, Coinbase fell 10%, Circle dropped over 11%. Coinbase became the worst-performing stock in the S&P 500 that day.
The crypto industry's decade-long wait for a "big and comprehensive" regulatory framework died at the 60-vote threshold.
Point 2: But on the same day, two bills advanced smoothly in the House.
The House Ways and Means Committee passed H.R.10357, the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act, by 38 to 5.
The provisions are very specific: on-chain gas fees under $10 per transaction are exempt from tax (except for those with over 5,000 transfers in the previous year); wash sale rules extend to digital assets, but qualified USD stablecoins are exempt; qualified trusts can stake assets; digital asset lending is not considered a taxable sale.
However—mining and staking rewards are still taxed as ordinary income, taxable upon receipt with no deferral. If you stake and receive 100 SOL, and the coin price drops 80%, you still pay tax based on the price on the day you received it. The cash flow pressure on miners and stakers remains unresolved.
Point 3: The second bill is even tougher.
The House Financial Services Committee advanced H.R.8957, the American Reserve Modernization Act (ARMA), by 28 to 21.
Core content: approximately 328,000 BTC held by the government will be locked for at least 20 years, during which they cannot be sold, auctioned, exchanged, or disposed of in any way. The Treasury must publish reserve certificates quarterly and undergo independent audits. Proceeds from sales can only be used for two purposes—either to increase Bitcoin reserves or to reduce national debt.
But note: the original goal of "purchasing 1 million BTC over 5 years" was removed. The bill became purely a "stock lock"—no new purchases, just preventing the government from dumping in the future.
No new sovereign buying. Only 328,000 BTC are "mechanically removed" from circulation.
Point 4: The real signal is here.
CLARITY’s path requires the Senate’s 60-vote threshold and bipartisan consensus. The tax law was drafted by Republicans, and all Democratic amendments were rejected. Among the 23 co-sponsors of the reserve bill, 22 are Republicans.
The House is bypassing the Senate’s 60-vote threshold by using "specialized legislation." Tax matters go to the Ways and Means Committee, reserves to the Financial Services Committee, each advancing with party majorities, passing as many as possible.
What the Senate can’t handle, the House breaks down and handles separately.
Point 5: In one sentence.
Don’t just stare at CLARITY’s coffin. Washington is telling you: if comprehensive regulation can’t be done, then first write into law "how taxes are collected" and "how coins are stored."
The former affects whether you need to calculate gains and losses for every gas fee when filing taxes next year. The latter determines whether the U.S. government’s 328,000 BTC will be dumped on the market someday in the future.
CLARITY is dead, but crypto legislation is not. It has just switched to a track better suited to the current political reality.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 Lights off, lying down, phone lights up. $ZEC 1128.86 -> 1331.11 now 50x leverage, +895.54% 🔥 Brothers, you sleeping? Don't stare at the % only. A few days ago volume died, order book holding, just wouldn't drop. This wasn't gamble, it was waiting for the nod. To brothers who followed: Congrats. Take 50% profit, move SL to breakeven, let the rest run. Who missed? No FOMO. Wait for retest near 1250. If holds, then decide. Up next: Resistance 1350-1380. If fails, rest. If back below 1120, don't f#沙特管道修复预期压低油价
🚨 Saudi Oil Pipeline Restoration｜Oil Prices Weaken in Short Term
Saudi Arabia is accelerating repairs on the east-west oil pipeline damaged by a drone attack, with the market expecting partial operations to resume in the coming days.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is increasing crude oil shipments routed through Oman to ease market concerns over Middle East supply disruptions. In the latest trades, Brent crude fell to about $104.59/barrel, WTI around $101.29/barrel.
Core logic:
🛢️ Partial pipeline restoration → Reduced pressure on Saudi exports
🚢 Increased alternative transport via Oman → Short-term supply outlook improves
📉 Crude oil risk premium declines → Oil prices under pressure
⚠️ However, the pipeline is not fully restored yet, and geopolitical risks in the Middle East remain
My view:
The short-term crude trading logic has shifted from "supply disruption trade" to "supply restoration trade." If pipeline repairs continue faster than expected, oil prices will face further downward pressure; but if repairs are again delayed, oil prices may quickly reprice supply risks.
On BTC/U.S. stocks:
Oil price decline → Marginal relief in inflation pressure → Short-term positive for U.S. stock risk assets; if U.S. Treasury yields also fall, BTC's risk appetite environment may further improve.Long and Short Crowding List
$ONE Current rate is opposite to the total settled rate in the past 24 hours: current rate -1.0000%, at the 0th percentile among the latest 100 single settlement samples; total settled rate in the past 24 hours 6 times +0.187%; settling at the current rate, funding fees are paid by shorts to longs, which is opposite to the payment relationship reflected by the cumulative rate in the past 24 hours; price increased by 2.32%, position value changed by +11.01%.
$ZEC Negative rate is at a historical low among samples, shorts bear the settlement cost: current rate -0.0457%, at the 0th percentile among the latest 100 single settlement samples; total settled rate in the past 24 hours 3 times -0.052%; price increased by 0.18%, position value changed by +1.25%. Settling at the current rate, funding fees are paid by shorts to longs, and the negative rate magnitude is on the more extreme side of historical samples.
$SNDK Positive rate is at a historical high among samples, longs bear relatively high settlement costs: current rate +0.0400%, at the 96th percentile among the latest 100 single settlement samples; total settled rate in the past 24 hours 3 times +0.080%; price increased by 0.06%, position value changed by +0.35%. Settling at the current rate, funding fees are paid by longs to shorts, and the current rate is higher than most historical single settlement samples.
ONE, ZEC: Price increases coexist with shorts paying fees, shorts face both rising prices and funding cost.On September 16, the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee passed H.R.10357, the "Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act," with 38 votes in favor and 5 against. Both parties rarely stood together.
As soon as the news broke, insiders cheered.
"No tax on fees under $10!"
"Stablecoins get exemptions!"
"Trusts can now pledge assets!"
But don’t rush to celebrate. After reading through the 114-page bill, you’ll find the truly important clause was removed.
First, the good news, there is some.
One, on-chain fees under $10 per transaction are tax-exempt. From now on, when you transfer funds or pay gas, you don’t have to worry about whether or how to report that fee. But there’s a condition — people who made over 5,000 transfers last year don’t qualify.
In other words, this is for ordinary users, not for volume-trading studios.
Two, qualified U.S. dollar stablecoins enjoy wash sale rule exemptions. Stablecoin transfers become more flexible, and institutional market makers are no longer constrained.
Three, qualified trusts can pledge digital assets without affecting tax status. This is a real benefit for institutional staking products — previously, pledging through trusts could cause loss of tax qualification, but now that barrier is removed.
Together, these add up to the "certainty" in the bill’s title.
But the hidden landmine below is what really matters today.
The deferral provision for mining and staking rewards was deleted.
In June, Representative Mike Carey proposed the "Mining and Staking Tax Clarity Act," whose core was one clause: allowing miners and stakers to choose "tax upon sale, not upon receipt."
That clause was removed from the final version.
What does this mean?
If you mine 10 SOL today or receive 5 HYPE from staking — whether you sell or not, whether the price falls or not — at the moment you receive them, you must count their fair market value as income and pay tax.
You might say: then I’ll just sell them?
The problem is — many staking rewards have lock-up periods. You receive tokens but can’t move them. The tax bill arrives, but no cash does.
Cointelegraph quoted: "Without this provision, mining and staking rewards are still taxable upon receipt."
This is not theoretical. In 2022 and 2023, many miners received tax bills calculated at peak prices after the coin price crashed, holding coins that had dropped 80%, and still had to pay taxes.
History is repeating itself, but this time it’s the stakers’ turn.
The sting is yet to come.
Democratic Representative Lloyd Doggett proposed two amendments:
One required non-custodial and DeFi platforms to bear 1099 reporting obligations — rejected 12 to 28.
The other called for studying crypto mining’s impact on electricity and the environment — also rejected 16 to 25.
One demanded more transparency, the other research on impact. Both died.
Translation: what should be regulated wasn’t, what should be studied wasn’t.
The bill’s "worry" isn’t what it did wrong, but what it didn’t do.
It simplified small payments under $10 but didn’t touch miners’ and stakers’ most painful "tax upon receipt" issue. It gave stablecoins exemptions but didn’t provide cash flow relief for validators. It allowed trusts to pledge but didn’t allow individuals to defer.
Senator Steven Horsford himself said at the hearing: "This bill is not as comprehensive as I hoped; Congress needs to resolve when mining and staking rewards should be recognized as income."
Even those who voted yes admit the core problem remains unsolved.
In summary: it simplified your small payments but didn’t solve your cash flow dilemma of "tax upon receipt."
Miners and stakers are not winners today. They are the "compromised" side.
The bill still needs to pass the full House, the Senate, and be signed by the President. The House is in recess until after the midterm elections this week, and the schedule is not yet set.
But the tax law direction is clear: every token you receive is taxable income — whether you sell it or not.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 On September 16, the U.S. House Financial Services Committee passed the "American Reserve Modernization Act" (ARMA) with a vote of 28 to 21.
At first glance, this seems like an ordinary legislative advancement. But behind the numbers lies a key fact—
Of the 23 co-sponsors, 22 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
The sole Democrat, Representative Jared Golden from Maine, is not even a member of the Financial Services Committee.
Cross-referencing the co-sponsor list with the committee roster reveals:
Among the 23 Democrats on the committee, there was zero support.
Not a single one co-sponsored or voted in favor.
A year ago, the situation was completely different.
In July 2025, the CLARITY Act passed the House with a vote of 294 to 134, with 78 Democrats voting yes. In the Financial Services Committee, CLARITY passed bipartisanly at 32 to 19.
Back then, crypto legislation was a bipartisan affair. Republicans pushed, Democrats followed, and those 78 Democratic votes were the best proof.
One year later, the same group has turned against it.
Crypto policy analyst Diana Chen pinpointed the key:
"Regulating how Bitcoin is traded is a consumer protection issue; putting it on the federal balance sheet is a fiscal and monetary policy issue—the alliance starts to loosen there."
In plain terms: We can talk about how coins are traded. But putting taxpayers' money into Bitcoin? No way.
Maxine Waters put it even more bluntly.
The Democratic leader of the Financial Services Committee and California Representative Waters has previously clearly opposed Trump's strategic Bitcoin reserve executive order.
Her core logic is: Strategic reserves are usually used to support key goods for the U.S. economy and everyday family life. Cryptocurrency itself has no intrinsic value and does not belong in this category.
Waters also warned that this reserve could benefit Trump's close allies.
This is the underlying logic behind the Democrats' collective silence—not a lack of understanding of crypto, but distrust of linking the national balance sheet with crypto.
Looking at the practical side, ARMA itself is in a tough spot.
The bill requires the government to lock approximately 324,000 Bitcoins for at least 20 years, valued at about $26 billion.
But with Republicans holding a 30 to 23 majority in the Financial Services Committee, ARMA can pass without any Democratic votes.
It can pass the House. What about the Senate?
The corresponding Senate bill has not yet passed, and prediction markets estimate only a 6% chance that ARMA will become law before 2027.
CLARITY was just rejected in the Senate by 49 to 50, and the window for crypto legislation is closing.
The most dangerous aspect of this is not the bill itself.
It’s that the Bitcoin reserve is becoming a Republican party platform.
Consider the consequences:
If ARMA passes along purely partisan lines, future Democratic administrations will not repeal it—it's codified law, and repeal costs are too high.
But they also won’t expand it.
A "national strategic asset" will be labeled Republican and then cold-shouldered by the next administration.
This is not a victory for Bitcoin.
This is the beginning of Bitcoin being politically hijacked.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 The Federal Reserve's rate hike puts the People's Bank of China in a dilemma again
The Federal Reserve raised rates as expected.
Actually, over the past few years, the actual interest rate in the U.S. has paid less attention to the federal funds rate and more to the yields of 2-year and 1-year U.S. Treasury bonds. Recently, the 2-year Treasury yield surged to 4.7%, and it only dropped a bit after the announcement last night.
But the pressure is very real for China. The interest rate spread has widened again, China's exports are strong, a huge amount of money is held overseas, and there is significant capital outflow pressure. It can only be barely contained by RMB appreciation and administrative controls.
If the U.S. eases monetary policy in the next year or two, that would be fine, but the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has also broken 5%, indicating that long-term pricing is not based on next year's CPI, and the neutral interest rate will continue to rise.
This makes things even more complicated for China. If the U.S. cuts rates, the spread narrows, and the massive surplus returns—will you tighten liquidity? If the U.S. does not cut and maintains a high interest rate environment, how long can China's barriers hold? Japan and Europe are raising rates; will you follow?
Currently, a large amount of state-owned capital in China is being invested in equity, and the money is borrowed from banks. Borrowing to invest in stocks is a big taboo in finance! The reality is that in some places, enterprises making grand investments look impressive on the surface, but dividends are thin, shares cannot be sold, and funding costs are suffocating. Dare to raise rates? This is even riskier than smashing real estate or infrastructure investment.The most unusual detail in today's market is that despite $MSTRB only slightly rising 0.26% in 24 hours, the funding rate has been pushed close to zero, with neither longs nor shorts willing to pay the other side — this "funding rate grounded + price sticking" structure usually indicates that leveraged funds are waiting for a directional trigger rather than profiting passively from a trend.
Breaking down the funding positions: $MSTRB current price is 128.96, MA5=128.312 has crossed above MA20=127.764, MACD histogram +0.3614 maintains a bullish stance, RSI at 53.9 is in a neutral to slightly strong zone, Bollinger Bands are narrowing at [124.499, 131.029]. The price is moving along the middle band upwards with tightening bandwidth, a typical sign of an impending breakout. The trading volume of 10.4M USDT is not large, indicating this is not a strong push by major players but rather retail investors and market makers probing each other within a narrow range. The Fear and Greed Index is 50, showing neutral sentiment, with no panic selling creating a golden pit nor greedy chasing driving a rally; longs and shorts are in a stalemate.
My bias is bullish: the moving averages are aligned bullishly + MACD is positive + funding rate has no premium, indicating long positions have low cost and are not crowded yet. Once volume breaks above the upper Bollinger Band at 131.029, short covering will accelerate.Position midday update, the market continues to fluctuate
✅$HYPE long position｜full 20x
Unrealized profit +836.70U, return rate +140.37%
Entry price 73.897, current price 79.475, profit continues to expand.
But the margin ratio is only 4.92%, cannot be taken lightly, monitor the market at any time to prevent profit retracement.
❌ $BICO long position｜full 8x
Unrealized loss -1615.69U, return rate -675.77%
After a slight rebound, the loss has slightly narrowed, but still deeply trapped, margin ratio 4.92%, liquidation risk looming.
From smart money data, large capital shorts dominate, holding against the trend, position pressure is very high.
💡Midday thoughts:
Holding both profitable and deeply trapped counter-trend positions at the same time is mentally exhausting. The profitable positions are held with peace of mind, but the trapped positions torment the mindset with every market fluctuation. No matter how much profit, carrying a heavy counter-trend position keeps the account in a high-risk state.
I want to ask fellow traders: In this situation, should you first secure the profits already made, or prioritize freeing the trapped positions?
#美联储三年来首次加息25个基点
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 $TRUMP - My Read, No Hype Leverage is flushed. 24h total liq is only $480K. Longs $420K vs Shorts $63K. Biggest single liq $24K. 283 traders out. Market status: Normal. What changed? No crowded leverage now. Just quiet exits. Price pulled from $3.68 to $1.97. That insane 7000% run is now back to 2000%. Volatility 5.66%, volume under $100M. Story still hot, but fresh money is not following. We moved from emotion to grind. Next catalyst is CLARITY Act. Pass = new fuel. Fail = no anchor, drift loweA reminder in advance for those still immersed in the "FOMC is over" atmosphere: this week's storm has only just begun.
During this super central bank week, the Fed was just the opening shot — next up are the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan. In the UK, rising oil and gas prices are keeping inflation pressured, so it's highly likely they will hold steady but maintain a hawkish stance; every move by the Bank of Japan is even more tightly linked to global carry trades, and any slight disturbance will transmit volatility through exchange rates back to risk assets.
In trading, there's one rule: the busier the news week, the less you should act and the lighter your positions should be. Don't relax and go all-in on $BTC just because you survived one FOMC; what really blows you up is often the one you thought was behind you but suddenly explodes in the middle of the night.