
Orbit Post Sitemap
BTC whales dumped 30,000 coins in a week, but ETH whales are quietly accumulating? Damn, the recent moves by these big players are quite interesting.
According to the latest whale holdings statistics, BTC has been consolidating at a high level over the past week, but the whale group reduced their holdings by about 30,000 BTC, valued at approximately $2.52 billion based on the statistical criteria. On the other hand, ETH whales actually increased their holdings by 60,000 ETH, worth about $162 million.
One is reducing positions, the other is adding—this divergence definitely deserves a closer look. However, the specific statistical criteria and address ownership still need further verification; we can't just conclude institutional rotation based on these two numbers alone.
My current thought is to watch BTC short-term around 84,000. It previously surged to 85,650 but was pushed down; if the rebound can't hold above 84,000, I won't rush to go long. If 83,500 breaks, then continue to observe if there's support near 83,000.
ETH, on the other hand, deserves more patience. Referring to the previous trading around 2,697, whether 2,700 can be firmly reclaimed is critical. After a breakout, I'll watch 2,720 and 2,740. If it falls below 2,680 again, don't expect an independent rally just yet.
As for SOL, I'm temporarily watching the battle around 120. Until BTC stabilizes, it's not that easy for altcoins to rally continuously.
The most misleading thing in the market right now is seeing whales buy and immediately thinking it's about to take off.
Damn, they bought 60,000 ETH and can totally hold through volatility patiently. If we chase in with 20x leverage, one sharp drop will make us question everything.On the eve of the non-farm payrolls, the market is waiting for an answer
The PCE data has just been released, summarized in one sentence: signs of cooling inflation are becoming increasingly evident.
This report is milder than expected, with a month-on-month increase of only 0.2%. Once the data came out, the market's bet on an October rate hike quickly cooled, with the probability sliding from a previous high to around 38%. In other words, holding steady has become the most likely scenario. Goldman Sachs also adjusted its forecast accordingly, moving the timing of the next rate hike from October to December.
There are still hawkish voices within the Federal Reserve reminding that the absolute level of inflation remains high, and the possibility of another move within the year cannot be completely ruled out. The significance of this data lies in: if employment remains strong, it indicates economic resilience, and rate hike expectations will heat up again, with BTC bearing the brunt; conversely, if employment performance is mediocre, rate hike concerns will continue to ease, giving BTC a chance for an upward breakout.
The market has already reacted in advance. BTC once climbed to 85500 but was quickly pushed back. The logic is simple—large funds are reluctant to make rash bets before the non-farm payrolls release, with obvious selling pressure above. Short-term support is seen around 82000, with resistance still near 85000.
Strategically, patience is more important than courage. Betting heavily on direction before the data release is a gamble—winning is luck, losing is a real cost. It's more prudent to wait for the non-farm payrolls dust to settle, see how the market prices it, and then decide whether to enter the market. #加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 #比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出 Happy National Day to everyone! Doge is starting to build applications, and there's a new topic tonight~
$DOGE DogeOS has opened its public testnet, providing developers with an EVM-compatible environment. Teams working on lending, trading, gaming, and other products are building on it. For token holders, the story can finally move towards "what can I do with it." Ready-made development tools can be reused, which is easier to attract builders than requiring teams to learn a whole new technology. However, this is an application-layer testnet, so test activity cannot be directly counted as real capital inflow. I look forward to usable applications at mainnet launch that give community members who were just watching a reason to stay and use it.
$BICO at 0.02129u, down about 2% in 24 hours, nearly 6% down in the past week. The daytime recovery did not bring a higher evening quote, so the short-term assessment should be cautious. The previously watched 0.022 USD level remains above; even if there is a rebound close to it later, we need to see if the volume can sustain. This is not a place to temporarily increase positions just because of a drop; if every rebound is quickly given back, admit the momentum is weak first!
$OKB still retains resilience, around 120.72u, up about 0.5% in 24 hours. I treat 120u as an integer observation level, not as a preset reliable support. If it can reduce pullbacks during market fluctuations and volume warms up afterward, it looks more like sustained buying; if it only temporarily falls less and then drops again later, the judgment needs to be revised. Comparing strength and weakness is useful, but conclusions must be allowed to change with price movements; you can't label it in the morning and still watch the market with the same script in the evening.Personally, I feel that if ETH's fee rate doesn't drop to 0.01, it's not recommended to short; it might reverse in the middle of the night【Position Breakdown #7|DASH: Why hasn't the most profitable position been sold yet】
System Signal Position|Entered on 09-17
① What was said at entry
🆕 Long signal RR2.7 Signal price 58.44
Signal price 58.44, stop loss 51.3248 (structural level). Every field in the ledger is traceable.
② Current status
Current price 65.14|+0.9R|2R level 72.6704|Target 78.77
③ Three possible next scenarios
Reaching 2R → Sell half to lock in profits, leave the rest for the target.
Breaking below 51.3248 → Admit mistake and exit, no negotiation.
Sideways → Hold steady, let the stop loss decide for me.
My bias: Floating profit is not a reason to sell; stop loss and target levels are. As long as the structure isn't broken, I'll stay with it.
What's the position you've held the longest? Does your original reason still hold? Let's discuss in the comments.
———
Data comes from a self-built mechanical scanning system: over two hundred mainstream contracts, confirmed on daily and weekly dual cycles,
four layers of factor scoring → phase classification → odds gate → position filtering. All outputs are programmatic, no subjective judgment involved.
Parameters and weights are not disclosed. Not investment advice, does not constitute any profit guarantee,
crypto assets are highly volatile, please assess your risk tolerance accordingly.
#OKXPlanet #QuantitativeTrading #PositionBreakdown The first time I encountered this thing
was when a friend pulled me into a group
Watching people post their orders every day
I felt itchy inside
so I opened an account myself
My first purchase was some $BTC
After buying, I just stared at it
When it rose a bit, I wanted to sell
When it fell a bit, I scolded myself
During that time, I couldn't sleep well
Later I got some $ETH
Not because I understood it
but because I was too lazy to move
In the end, I held on
Didn't make much profit
In between, I also chased $SOL
Bought it and it pulled back
Sold at a loss and then it rose again
Got so mad I closed the app
Now my position is very small
Playing with spare money
If I earn, I add a dish
If I lose, I order less takeout
Don't borrow money
Don't get carried away
Just listen to others' calls
If you lose, no one will bear it for you
The market moves even at midnight
You can't keep an eye on it
Nor control it
Sleeping well is better than anything
This industry has many opportunities but also many traps
Survive first, then talk about other things
Life is still life
Coins are just coins#比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出
#美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解
#伊朗收到美国反提案,美伊分歧仍在 And when everyone uses "the future" to price, the price loses its anchor.
The third truth: The "low circulation + high leverage" of TGE is a perfect meat grinder.
Now let's talk about the core mechanism.
CT's TGE was completed on September 30. Total supply is 1 billion tokens, with no inflation. Distribution structure: 35% ecosystem, 22% team, 28% investors, 15% foundation.
The key is: the circulating supply at TGE is extremely low. The 35% allocated to the ecosystem is not released all at once, and the 22% for the team and 28% for investors have long-term vesting plans. This means the actual tradable CT only accounts for a small portion of the total supply.
AInvest pointed out this issue before CT went live: On Coinbase's price page, CT's circulating supply shows zero, with no market or trading volume data. On-chain data shows the largest CT address holds only 6,250,250 tokens, and there are only two holders. $CT $ETH $BTC #加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 #比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出 #美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解 $1390 ZEC, do you dare to buy the dip?
$1670 failed to break through three times, the $1490 rebound was smashed back today, and over 1.81 million long positions were liquidated in 4 hours — this is not a shakeout, it's a meat grinder. You think it's a pullback, but actually the lower edge of the range is sharpening its blade.
Let's look at the surface first: the positive news remains, but the price no longer rises.
From the peak at $1697, it was hammered down to $1360 to stop falling, rebounded to $1494, and today fell back to $1390. A small drop in 24 hours, a 5-7% retracement in 7 days, and still +66% in 30 days. Market cap is 23.7 billion, ranked 10th. Trading volume contracted compared to the surge on the 27th, a typical pattern of turnover and leverage washout. The daily chart shows a drop from overbought, short moving averages flattening and slightly downward. All indicators say one thing: $1390 is stuck at the lower edge of the range; if it doesn't hold, a deep correction will come.
First thing: this is not bad news, it's leverage cleaning.
In 4 hours, it dropped from $1449 to $1392, liquidating 1.81 million long positions in the same hour, with almost no shorts. The leverage clearing after a spike and drop is not a new crash.
In plain language:
If you chased longs at $1490, you're now trapped. It's not that ZEC is weak, your leverage is too high. The market just told you with $1.81 million: chasing longs at the upper edge of the range is just giving money to the manipulators.
Same script: $1670 rejected three times, each time bulls rushed up first, then got pushed back. Fourth time? Don't rush to bet, first see if $1360 can hold.
Second thing: NU7 testnet on October 6, only a few days left.
Code completion target was September 30, testnet set for October 6 (height 4465026), go/no-go decision for mainnet on October 20, mainnet target November 5: 25-second block time, eliminate v4/Sprout, keep halving.
Sounds impressive? Let me tell you where the risk lies:
Upgrade stories are double-edged swords. Expectations are maxed out; delays mean crashes. If the testnet is delayed or October 20 gives a no-go, short-term expectations will be smashed. The 25-second block time doesn't increase issuance because block subsidies are cut by two-thirds simultaneously — that's good, but the market only cares if the switch happens on time.
Don't treat the upgrade as a lifesaver; it could also be a death sentence.
Third thing: the ETF story has dulled.
ZCSH 3-for-1 split landed, scale about 900 million, accounting for 3.5% of total supply. European ETPs are expanding but are just channels, not new subscriptions today. ETFs only custody transparent addresses.
Got it?
Privacy coin ETFs only touch transparent addresses. The shielded pool, about 30% of supply, is inaccessible to institutions. You bought ZEC for the "privacy narrative," but ETFs buy transparent ZEC — it's like ordering beef noodles but only getting noodles, the beef is at the next table.
ETFs are channels, not demand. Don't treat them as a lifeline.
Bull vs. bear, you decide:
On one side:
Total supply 21 million, scarcity logic is strong
Shielded pool about 30% supply, privacy is a real differentiator
November upgrade + ETF channel, story not dead
30-day still +66%, market cap top 10
On the other side:
$1670 rejected three times, $1490 lost today
Leverage cleaning just liquidated 1.81 million, bulls weakened
BTC consolidating at 83,000-84,000, if it loses 82,600, ZEC breaks structure first
$1390 is 18% cheaper than $1697, but still not cheap compared to the $800-1000 start zone in August-September
Before upgrade, testnet and decision day remain; any delay is a risk
Key level $1390, only $30 above the lifeline $1360.
Resistance above: 1440-1460 → 1490-1500 (lost today) → 1540-1580 → 1670-1697 (ceiling)
Support below: 1373 (today's low) → 1355-1360 (Sept 29 lifeline) → 1290-1300 → 1180
Trading strategy
Aggressive:
Light long positions near $1390, stop loss at $1350. First target $1440, second target $1490. Reduce half at $1440. Don't be greedy; buying at the lower edge of the range is licking the blade.
Conservative:
Wait for confirmation to open longs at $1360-1375, stop loss $1288. Better entry at $1290-1320. If not reached, take small positions, don't force it.
Breakout:
Only consider chasing if volume supports a hold above $1500 and pullback doesn't break $1460, targets $1540, $1620. Abandon fake breakouts, don't be a bagholder.
Bearish:
Light short positions on weak rallies between $1440-1490, stop loss $1520, target $1360. Don't short near $1360 — that's the lifeline; break it first.
Position sizing:
Single trade risk no more than 2% of total capital, leverage recommended 3-5x. Intraday 6-8% swings are common, don't use high leverage to bet on the fourth breakout.
Risk control priorities (memorize):
If $1360 breaks with volume, next supports at $1290, $1180, reduce positions first.
If BTC breaks 82,600 and accelerates down, reduce ZEC positions simultaneously.
If NU7 testnet delays or October 20 no-go, short-term expectations will be smashed.
ZEC now is like a tightly stretched rubber band —
$1670 rejected three times, today it also gave up the $1490 rebound. $1390 can only defend the lower edge, not go all-in for new highs.
Surviving until $1360 breaks or $1500 holds is more important than using high leverage to bet on the fourth breakout at the lower edge.
You are not bottom fishing; you are catching a flying knife. Don't reach out before the knife lands.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC Bitwise's NEAR ETF (Arca: $NRR) had a very impressive capital performance on its first day. When compared by market cap ratio, NEAR's ETF first-day capital inflow capability is clearly higher than $SOL: 📊 First-day net inflow / market cap • $NEAR: about 0.55% • $SOL: about 0.065% ➡️ By this measure, NEAR is about 8–9 times that of SOL 📈 First-day trading volume / market cap • $NEAR: about 0.23% • $SOL: about 0.05% Even more noteworthy, the asset under management (AUM) of the NEAR ETF surpassed $50 million on the second day of launch. This is not just an ETF data point but also reflects that the market is focusing on narratives such as AI, intelligent agents, privacy, and on-chain intelligent infrastructure, with NEAR positioned at the intersection of these directions. ⚠️ Disclaimer: The author discloses being a contractor for Proximity Labs and holding $NEAR. The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. #NEAR #NEARProtocol #NEARETF #Bitwise #CryptoETF #AI #CryptoBrothers, I’m really driven crazy by $ZEC
Last week when I shorted, it surged all the way up; this week when I finally went long, it started to plummet wildly. Every market move precisely avoids me.
ZEC has now dropped to 1389.80, and my 50x long position is completely in danger. Entry price was 1419.02, unrealized loss is -105.04%.
What’s most frustrating isn’t the drop, but that I clearly had unrealized gains before, yet I didn’t exit, stubbornly hoping it would keep rising. The gains disappeared, losses came, and now I can only stare blankly at my account.
Previously, ZEC crashed down from 1697, I thought it had dropped over 200 points and was due for a rebound, so I went long. Who knew this crazy knife doesn’t follow any logic, it even pierced through 1400 for me.
Right now, the short-term trend is clearly weak, and the buying power is weak too.
I’m watching two zones:
1400–1420, to see if it can hold again; around 1380, to see if it can stop falling.
If it keeps going down, I’ll have to admit defeat and reduce my position. If it rebounds, I’ll first look for a chance to exit near 1480.
Last week short, lost.
This week long, also a mess.
I’m not here to trade ZEC, I feel like I’m here to pay tuition to ZEC. 😭
#加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 #比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出 #美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解 $ETH showed an interesting capital signal today.
A wallet associated with early Ethereum holders just transferred 133,298 ETH, worth about $356 million.
But don’t rush to interpret this as "a whale is about to dump."
This ETH was only moved to a new address, with no evidence it has entered an exchange.
More notably, another data set:
Wallets holding at least 100,000 ETH now collectively control about 17.41 million ETH, accounting for 22.03% of the total ETH supply, a 9-week high.
In other words:
Individual whales are shifting their chips,
but the overall whale group’s holding ratio is rising.
ETH is currently around $2690, right at the $2700–$2750 resistance zone.
Trading plan:
Entry: $2,650–$2,700
Take profit: $2,750 / $2,850 / $2,950 / $3,100 / $3,300
Stop loss: $2,590 Does saying "gradually decentralize" indefinitely postpone all problems?
The $CORE project team claims to have taken the first step toward decentralization, and many supporters argue that decentralization is a gradual process that cannot be achieved overnight.
It sounds reasonable, but two hard facts cannot be ignored: the top ten token-holding addresses control nearly 90% of the tokens, showing high concentration; in August, there was a token issuance event, and to this day, there has been no complete official explanation.
True gradual decentralization must have a clear timetable and verifiable on-chain implementation actions, not just empty words like "take it slow."
Stable block production is just the basic work a public chain should have, yet it is packaged as a milestone; the announcement vaguely states "handover of some block roles in the coming months," with no precise timing or quantitative assessment criteria.
While painting a grand vision of decentralization, the tokens remain firmly locked in the hands of a few large holders, and the doubts about the issuance are glossed over.
The word "gradually" has become a universal excuse for delaying problems. During the long wait, all the risks are left to ordinary retail holders.
Decentralization relies on on-chain data, not repeated slogans. Without concrete implementation actions to support it, no matter how appealing the narrative, it cannot hide the real contradictions.
⚠️ Risk reminder: Content related to virtual currencies is only personal opinion sharing and does not constitute investment advice. $CT encountered resistance at 0.5, which might be the peak for this coin.
However, the CVD below still shows net inflow, and the volume is large.
There might be another wave of rally; if you want to go long, this position is still okay.
Just set your stop loss properly; the target above is 0.55 $CT decisively short! Looking at the total number of people is useless; only by breaking down the average position per person can you know who is really playing for keeps!
There are 128 bulls who have only pooled over 80,000 U in total, averaging about 600 U each—typical retail investors just joining the hype. Now look at the bears: 112 people have directly staked 450,000 U, averaging over 4,000 U each. The capital density crushes the bulls by 6 times.
On one side are retail investors chasing the rally with pocket money; on the other side are the main players smashing the market with heavy funds. Who do you think the market will listen to next? No matter how loud the retail investors shout, they absolutely cannot withstand the heavy real money pressure pushing down.
The excitement always belongs to retail investors, but the pricing power lies in the hands of big money. I choose to stand on the side where capital absolutely dominates; the short position is already heavily placed!Last week, New York filed a lawsuit against Polymarket, determining that this type of prediction market constitutes illegal gambling.
This week, the CFTC submitted two regulatory proposals to the White House, directly classifying prediction markets as swaps. According to federal law, swap business falls under the jurisdiction of the CFTC, and states have no authority to regulate it independently, marking a new development in the regulatory power struggle.
The two proposals have clear divisions of responsibility.
The first proposal directly categorizes event-based contracts as swaps, bringing Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, and Robinhood's prediction market products under CFTC regulation.
The second proposal specifically excludes pure gambling products, clarifying regulatory boundaries and distinguishing between ordinary gambling and compliant event contracts.
Currently, the two proposals are under review by the White House Office of Management and Budget. Public comments will be solicited only after approval. There is still some time before implementation, and they are not yet in effect, but the policy direction is already very clear.
There is also a judicial tug-of-war behind this. Previously, the Sixth and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals have ruled on the definition of swaps, and the Supreme Court has accepted three related appeals. This matter will most likely await a final ruling from the Supreme Court to settle it once and for all. $BTC $ZEC $ETH #加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 BTC at $83,900, are you betting on 90,000?
PCE was cooler, BTC surged to 85,500, then was pushed back to 83,900 by the 5.3% US Treasury yield. ETF had nine consecutive positive days but then stopped at 149 million. Is this a shakeout or a trend change?
First, look at the surface: data day spikes are not direction confirmations.
On Wednesday, PCE data came out: August year-over-year at 3.4%, core at 3.0%, lower than some expectations. BTC surged to 85,500-85,600 within hours, short sellers were swept out. Then what? The 10-year US Treasury yield remained near 5.3%, and the 30-year yield was close to the highest since 2002. The rebound didn’t hold, and on Thursday it returned to the 83,900 you see. Monday’s low at 82,570-82,600 still stands, and the September 21 high at 87,300-87,400 was not broken.
Remember one thing: data day spikes are not direction confirmations. Don’t mistake a rebound for a reversal.
First thing: PCE gave a boost, bonds did not.
PCE was cooler, the market was excited for an hour. But the bond market didn’t cooperate, yields didn’t drop, so BTC couldn’t rise. 🔥$ZEC surged to 1400 then plummeted—this time, is it a deep squat before takeoff or the final farewell?
My analysis framework:
🟢 Bullish logic: If 1220-1250 holds, after the NU7 upgrade lands, there's a high probability of testing the 1700-1865 range. Supply contraction + ETF funds + network qualitative change triple resonance.
🔴 Bearish risk: If it breaks below 1350 with volume, the consolidation period will lengthen, with a pullback target of 1100-1080. Some in the OKX community directly say "all altcoins end up at zero," and this voice is not without reason.
⚖️ Most likely scenario: consolidation and shakeout before the upgrade, repeatedly digesting profit-taking in the 1250-1400 range, then choosing direction after NU7 activation.
One honest final word:
ZEC's logic hasn't changed; what changed is your cost basis. Those who didn't get in at 500 USD and now chase 1400 will doubt everything after a 15% pullback. Position control is ten times more important than direction judgment.
What do you think? After the NU7 upgrade, will ZEC break through 1700 or retest 1100? Post your target price in the comments.
#ZEC再创本轮新高,逼近1700美元
#加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 BigShort101 — Day 3 🩳
$30,766 bought back in the first 3 days.
This round: $4,064.92 across 44 tokens, with 384 successful transactions.
Top buybacks:
$shortguy — $2,842.53
$QUANT — $507.34
$111 — $435.01
Memes buying memes. The relay continues.The first US NEAR spot ETF has been listed on NYSE Arca with the ticker NRR and a management fee of 0.75%. On the first day, net inflows were about $35.5 million, trading volume about $15.1 million, and the fund size about $36 million.
This ETF does not simply hold NEAR; it also plans to use the NEAR held by the fund for internal staking, with staking rewards included in the fund's net asset value. For institutions, besides price exposure, they can also benefit from staking rewards, adding an extra layer of appeal.
NEAR receiving spot ETF treatment indicates it has passed the SEC review and is recognized on a compliance level. This is another single-asset spot ETF after BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP. First time buying crypto
Purely following the trend
Someone in the group showed off their profits
I got blinded by greed
Rushed in and bought $BTC
It dropped right after I bought
Those days, I felt unmotivated doing anything
Later I realized
It wasn’t that I picked well
It was just bad luck
I also held $ETH
Made me question my life
Couldn’t bear to sell when it rose a bit
Too scared to buy more when it dropped a bit
Ended up breaking even
Just wasted effort
There was also $SOL
Bought at the top chasing the price
Didn’t sleep well for three days
Sold it and then it went up again
So mad I closed the app
Now I’ve learned my lesson
Only use spare money
Keep position small enough to not matter
If it rises, just add a small amount
If it falls, it doesn’t affect my life
Don’t trust anyone shouting trade calls
Don’t borrow money
Don’t stay up late watching the charts
Candlesticks won’t get better just because you stare at them
This game can be played
But don’t let it play you
Being alive is better than anything #比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出
#美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解
#伊朗收到美国反提案,美伊分歧仍在 Hello everyone,
Today the overall account performance looks good, but the process was extremely torturous. $NEAR and ZEC full-position long orders are still held, with profits fluctuating amid pullbacks and struggles. SOL just opened an isolated margin long order to test the waters, basically hovering near the cost line.
$NEAR: Profit Defense Battle
Entry price 4.909, current price 5.0920.
Full position 20X, unrealized profit 165.25U, ROI 71.09%.
This order once earned nearly double at its peak, now it has pulled back to 71%. Honestly, watching the profit shrink day by day stirs some emotions.
$ZEC: Underwater Defense
Entry price 1403.02, current price 1398.72.
Full position 20X, unrealized loss 3.18U, ROI -6.15%.
This order once lost 12%, today it slightly recovered but is still struggling underwater.
$SOL: Isolated Margin Test
Entry price 117.41, current price 117.44.
Isolated margin 20X, unrealized profit 1.09U, ROI 0.51%. Margin rate 19.98%.
Newly opened order, just entered and is rubbing near the cost line. Why open a new order now? Note, it’s isolated margin. Because the previous full-position orders are pulling back and the market is unclear, I deliberately use isolated margin to isolate risk and test SOL.
#加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键
#比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出
#美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解 The tax rules have been written into the proposal, but the law has not been enacted yet.
Daines dropped a 56-page ADAPT: Qualified USD stablecoins used for purchases generally do not recognize gains or losses, and wash sales are also proposed to extend to digital assets. The media loves to copy GENIUS's stablecoin payment line—I’m watching the effective date: most provisions are written to take effect after 2026-12-31, and it still needs to pass both chambers and be signed.
Whether the draft passes review is another matter. I'll first separate the "proposal-level tax rules" from the "already enacted laws."
#美参议院提出新加密税收法案ADAPT The gang leader has something to say
The US Senate has introduced a new crypto tax bill, the ADAPT Act.
Key points: No capital gains or losses recognized for stablecoin purchases of goods and services. Wash sale rules extended to digital assets. Gas fees under $10 are tax-exempt. It also covers tax treatment for staking, lending, and ETF pledging.
I think this is a step toward compliance in the tax system. Tax exemption for stablecoin daily payments effectively opens payment scenarios for USDT and USDC, making them function more like money. But the extension of wash sale rules tightens regulations, making short-term trading tax loss harvesting less feasible. Tax exemption for small gas fees is beneficial for high-frequency on-chain operations.
Overall, the bill is still in the legislative stage and not yet effective, so it doesn't directly boost coin prices in the short term. But in the long run, clearer crypto tax rules will encourage institutional participation, which is a slow-moving factor.$TRUMP $TRUMP The king of understanding is wild again, a 15-minute roller coaster is really thrilling!
Just took a short break, TRUMP is on a roller coaster again. Directly from 2.04 to 2.25, now fluctuating repeatedly at 2.18. Bollinger Bands are opening, trading volume is 149 million u. Funds are crazily competing.
Every time I buy MeMe coin, it feels like riding a roller coaster. One second in heaven, the next in hell. At this position, there is support at 2.08 below and resistance at 2.25 above.
It's a buying point to enter the position, let's see if you're just showing off or if you really have the skills $MON has risen quite a bit these days, but it's still far from the 0.5 it was at when it first launched. At launch, the slogan was to have Solana's performance, $ETH's user base, and $SUI's ecosystem! However, the market didn't buy into it, and after launch, it plummeted, dropping to 0.015, a decline of over 95%, gradually fading away in the crypto world! During this bull market period, it finally started to rise, gaining 20% just today. I believe many brothers have already chased the rally, but in my view, chasing now is just handing over your chips, as there's a year's worth of trapped positions waiting to be released. If you dare to chase, they dare to take all your chips!TVL is approximately $1.261 billion. Cumulative trading volume exceeds $2.3 billion. Depositing users exceed 54,000.
With a TVL of $1.2 billion, it ranks among the top DeFi protocols. This is not a "whitepaper project." This is infrastructure where institutions have already invested real money.
The second truth: Coinbase's "roadmap effect" is the first wave of fuel.
The first spark for CT's surge was not its listing on exchanges, but on Coinbase.
In mid-September, Coinbase added CT to its asset listing roadmap and generated deposit addresses for the ERC-20 token.
Do you understand this signal?
Coinbase's roadmap is not a promise of "upcoming listing." According to Coinbase's own policy, the roadmap is just a "candidate list," and assets may be delayed or removed before trading begins.Many people try to recover their losses all at once, but end up losing even more. I used to be like that too, losing 200,000U. Later I realized that recovery doesn't come from going all in, but from steadily accumulating small profits. Currently BTC is at 83615.6, resistance at 83825.42, support at 83123.1. My strategy is simple: lightly short near resistance with a stop loss at 83900 and a target of 83400; lightly long near support with a stop loss at 83050 and a target of 83700. Small positions of 5000U, never hold without stop loss. Take a little profit each time and move on, small gains add up. Remember, on the road to recovery, slow is fast. $BTC #加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 #ETH强势拉升,空头清算超11亿美元
Trading Log October 1st
Opened a long position on ETH three days ago
No unrealized losses, added to the position, quietly waiting for the market to reveal the answer
The market is always there
Stay at the table
More important than making money
When there is no clear signal
Do not trade frequentlyTrading insights: Occasionally profiting from faulty logic is very dangerous. The money earned from wrong logic is just a temporary bonus lent to you by the market, not a sign of strong trading ability. There is a hidden fatal risk here. First, it easily solidifies illusions—occasional profits lead to the mistaken belief that this flawed method works! Luck is misjudged as skill, creating a distorted trading perception.
Second, it amplifies greed. Lucky gains encourage the impulse to take heavy positions, making one bolder and continuously increasing stakes by repeating this flawed logic. Third, it plants the risk of liquidation. A faulty system cannot withstand market reversals; just one extreme market event can wipe out all previous profits at once $BTC $ETH 【On-Chain Trading Update|ZEC】
Monitored address 0xc30c opened a short position:
▪ Execution price: 1,396.28 USD
▪ Transaction amount this time: 74,309.97 USD
▪ Leverage: 10xPENDLE Has the Product. Now Price Needs Proof
PENDLE is expanding into RWAs, tokenized stocks and institutional yield.
The fundamentals are real. Price remains unconvinced.
Around $2.35, PENDLE is still ~61% below its 2025 high.
$2.10 is the level that matters. Lose it, and structure weakens.
$2.78 is the first sign sentiment’s turning.
This is a watch, not a long.
The market wants real TVL, volume and fee growth—not more announcements.
#USTreasuryYieldsClimb
$PENDLE The gang leader has something to say
The US Senate has introduced the ADAPT Act, a new crypto tax law. Here are the key points. Buying goods and services with stablecoins does not recognize capital gains or losses. Wash sale rules are extended to digital assets. Gas fees under $10 are tax-exempt. It also involves tax treatment for staking, lending, and ETF pledging.
I believe this law is moving the tax system toward compliance.
Tax exemption for daily stablecoin payments opens payment scenarios for USDT and USDC. In the future, buying things with stablecoins won’t require calculating capital gains, making them function more like money.
The extension of wash sale rules is a tightening. This rule existed for stocks before, and now it applies to digital assets as well. Selling short-term and immediately buying back cannot be used for tax loss harvesting. The "CORE Bank" that everyone has been asking about, where exactly is it now?
The CORE Bank that many people talk about is officially named SatPay (Bitcoin New Bank/Neobank). It is not a traditional bank where you can open an account immediately. It is the most important "BTC-Fi landing flagship" on the entire chain and also the real income engine everyone is most looking forward to.
Breaking down the current real progress:
- ✅ The foundation has been set: Cooperation has been established with the overseas new bank infrastructure team Mobilum, based on the Hermes hard fork upgraded mainnet as the foundation. The technical framework for the three major modules of staking, lending, and payment has been finalized; the goal is to enable BTC to be used without giving up custody rights, allowing it to earn interest, be used as collateral for loans, and even be directly linked to a consumption card for use.
- ✅ AMP asset management protocol has been piloted: Equivalent to the "bank's wealth management department" going live early for testing, packaging BTC+CORE staking yields into strategies, generating fees, and partially flowing back to repurchase CORE; this is a preliminary experimental field for SatPay to generate its own cash flow, and the model has been verified on a small scale.
- ⚠️ The public official version is not yet available: Currently in the stages of compliance integration, institutional custody channel opening, and internal testing refinement; the official team has not provided a definite launch date. Recent Twitter updates mostly focus on directions and showcasing partner progress, without releasing a fully open product entry point. #美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解 #伊朗收到美国反提案,美伊分歧仍在 $BTC The biggest lesson from trading recently is: with little capital, you absolutely cannot use high leverage. 100x leverage means that just a 1% adverse move will liquidate your position; this margin for error in the crypto world is basically a death sentence. I once held a heavy position on a certain coin and stubbornly held on, watching the liquidation price come within 0.4%. That suffocating feeling of staring at the K-line late at night is something I never want to experience again.
The core logic for trading BTC and ETH is "low leverage + spot mindset + strict stop-loss." Don’t always think about getting rich overnight. In this market, surviving longer is always more important than making quick profits.$BTC $ETH $ZEC These three are not moving in sync.
I still only wait for buying opportunities after a pullback,
even if it means waiting half a day,
I won’t switch to short positions.
If I lose, I handle it according to plan,
if I profit, I take it at the target.
#加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键
#比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出
#美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解 Is $SNDK repeatedly squeezing both sides? 👀 Let's break down the latest order-book structure. On the 15-minute chart, price is sitting at an important decision area after bouncing from an oversold move. 1️⃣ ORDER BOOK STRUCTURE • Overhead supply zone: **1,782–1,795** Sell orders are appearing in several layers. Larger visible blocks around **1,783–1,786** and another cluster near **1,791–1,794Not talking about K-line today. What we're discussing is: how CT's recent surge actually happened, and within that 1855% increase, how much is real and how much is leveraged.
The first truth: this is not "speculating on new coins," this is "speculating on infrastructure."
First, let's clarify who is behind CT.
Concrete is developed by Blueprint Finance. Blueprint is a New York-based company established after the 2023 FTX incident, having raised over $17 million in total funding, with investors including Polychain Capital, YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), and VanEck.
This is not a fly-by-night team. Polychain is one of the top VCs in the crypto industry, YZi Labs is backed by Binance, and VanEck is a traditional asset management giant managing hundreds of billions of dollars.Getting into virtual currency, at first I really didn't take it seriously. My friends kept posting screenshots in the group every day, and I was envious watching them, so I opened an account. My first purchase was some $BTC. After buying, I regretted it—afraid of a drop, afraid of missing out. I couldn't even sleep well those days. Later, I gradually understood a bit—not really understood, just lost a lot and learned not to mess around. I held $ETH for a while, didn't make much, but also didn't sell at the lowest point, so I guess I was lucky. I also tried $SOL in between; it surged sharply and dropped sharply too. If you have a weak heart, really don't play. Now my position is very small, just for fun. If I make money, I treat myself to a good meal; if I lose, I order a cheaper takeout. Don't borrow money, don't get carried away, don't believe in guaranteed profits. When others shout buy signals, you lose money, and they won't be responsible. The market moves even at midnight; you can't watch it all the time or control it. Getting a good night's sleep is more important than anything. There are opportunities in this field, but even more traps. Surviving is better than making a quick profit. Now when people ask me if they can play, I just say use spare money, play small, don't take it seriously. Life is still life, coins are just coins. #比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出
#美债收益率频创新高,长期利率压力未缓解
#伊朗收到美国反提案,美伊分歧仍在 #Interest Rate Hike Expectations Delayed, September Nonfarm Payrolls Become the Next Key
$BTC
US August Core PCE year-on-year and month-on-month were below expectations, indicating inflation is easing. The market has lowered the probability of a Fed rate hike in October, with Goldman Sachs pushing rate hike expectations to December. Although some Fed officials have expressed hawkish views, the market has already started pricing in a pause in rate hikes. Bitcoin is a high-risk asset; when liquidity expectations ease, risk appetite for funds increases. The market is now focused on the September nonfarm payroll report, as employment strength will directly alter Fed policy expectations.
On the order book, after the previous pullback, bearish pressure has somewhat eased, and there is buying support on the downside.
Choose to buy BTC on dips. Core logic: easing inflation suppresses rate hike expectations, market risk appetite warms up, waiting for nonfarm payrolls to catalyze the market. (The usual pattern: the market trades Fed liquidity expectations, rate hike expectations cool down, and risk assets tend to rebound.)
Currently in a data waiting window, as long as nonfarm payroll data does not significantly exceed expectations, US Treasury yields are unlikely to continue rising, giving BTC room to rebound. If employment data falls short of expectations, the rebound elasticity of risk assets will further increase.
Key focus: September nonfarm payrolls, US Treasury yields, and the US dollar trend.
$BTC A very low perpetual funding rate does not mean that leverage risk has disappeared.
Many people see the $ETH perpetual funding rate close to zero and assume the market is not crowded. The problem is, the rate only reflects the short-term price balance between long and short contracts; it does not directly tell you how large the total position size is. As long as both longs and shorts increase leverage simultaneously, the rate can remain calm while open interest keeps piling up.
The real danger is when price volatility is low, open interest keeps rising, but spot trading does not keep pace. At this point, the market is like a spring pulled tight on both sides; a single macro data release or a large order can trigger a cascade of stop losses. If position growth is supported by spot inflows, the risk is somewhat lower; if it’s just contracts betting against each other, the stability is only temporary.
Funding rates on different platforms can also offset each other. One side may be long-biased, the other short-biased, making the aggregated value appear neutral while actual positions are highly concentrated. Observing extreme values, duration persistence, and price premiums on individual platforms is often more useful than watching a market-wide average.
When the price finally breaks out of the range, which side blows up first is often determined by the position structure rather than the sign of the funding rate.
Low funding rates do not equal low risk; sometimes it just means neither longs nor shorts have conceded yet. XRP has been consolidating around the 1.50 level for five days—not the price that's being tested, but retail investors' patience, because institutions are quietly accumulating.
1. Institutional channels are silently expanding: According to CoinShares weekly report, XRP had a net inflow of $92.3 million last week, ranking third across the entire industry.
Price hasn't moved, but funds are flowing; such divergence usually precedes price correction.
2. Box consolidation: Between 1.49 and 1.54, it has been sideways for five trading days, with volatility compressed to this month's lowest level. Next is the time to choose a direction.
Most of its supply cap has been priced in, so I lean towards an upward move.
3. Positive factors like RLUSD, Brazil, and Coinbase collateral are slowly materializing, but none are strong enough to be a trigger—the missing piece is a weekly candle with volume expansion.
My view: The five-day sideways consolidation is not in vain; the direction choice is near. For the first wave, I’m targeting 1.6 A bull market is never a straight line upward. Some of the biggest opportunities are created when the market suddenly shakes out weak hands. One group sells in fear, another uses the volatility to rebalance. We can't control where price goes, but we can control our exposure, risk and discipline. My five core watchlist cards: $BTC $ETH $SOL $ZEC $UNI These aren't simply momentum plays in my framework. Each has an established role within different parts of the crypto/Web3 ecosystem, so short-term From BTC to BCH to CORE Hard Fork: A Decade-Long Tug of War Over "Decentralization"
⚠️For research review only, not investment advice
From the BTC scaling debate, to the BCH hard fork, and now to the CORE token burn hard fork, these ten years have essentially been a prolonged struggle centered on the concept of decentralization.
In the early days, Bitcoin blocks were only 1MB, causing transaction congestion and huge community disagreements. The big block faction advocated direct scaling to make Bitcoin a daily payment cash; the Core development team insisted on small blocks, fearing that larger blocks would prevent ordinary users from running nodes, leading the network toward centralization. In 2017, the conflict erupted completely, resulting in the BCH hard fork that expanded blocks to 8MB, splitting the two chains.
This debate continued into the BTCFi track with the CORE public chain. CORE's current hard fork plans to burn 150 million excess tokens to restore market confidence, but the governance issue of 21-node centralization remains. Code vulnerabilities can be fixed, but the structural contradiction of concentrated node power is difficult to eliminate with a single hard fork.
After a decade of fork wars, the core problem remains unchanged: it is difficult to achieve both performance and decentralization.
As the wisdom of the I Ching suggests, nothing is absolutely perfect. Every public chain must make trade-offs among efficiency, security, and decentralization. There is no perfect solution; all upgrades are a continuous process of balancing. #加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 #比特币ETF连续9日流入,ETH转流出 $BTC
Bullish bias. I'm holding my long position with a cost basis of 84300, and the current price is near the breakeven point.
The funding rate is 0.0068%/8h; a positive rate indicates longs are still paying to add positions, so the enthusiasm hasn't cooled. The open interest (OI) is 2.367 billion U, showing no decrease in volume and no capital flight. These two indicators support that the overall structure remains intact.
However, there's a contradiction here: the ADX (4H) is at 32.28, which indicates a strong trend, but the price is stuck grinding within a narrow range between 83765 and 84545, just a few hundred points. The 4H RSI is only 52.62, showing no strong momentum. The high ADX and narrow price range conflict, possibly indicating accumulation.
I plan to add some position when the price breaks the first resistance at 84545 to confirm strength. If it falls back below my cost basis of 84300 and fails to recover, I will exit half of my position. If it breaks the strong support below at 83118, I will admit my mistake and fully exit.
The price level that would prove my bullish bias wrong is 83118. If it breaks below here, I acknowledge I was wrong. #加息预期推迟,9月非农成下一关键 You keep adding to a losing position, hoping to pull the average cost closer, just like trying harder to hold onto something that's already decided to leave. But sometimes the trend is the trend, and forcing it only makes the damage bigger. Xiao Ma is staring at the two positions on the screen again: $ETH and $BTC — both fully long. Current unrealized drawdown: $ETH: around -38.6% $BTC: around -68.9% Sitting here, I'm asking myself again: Am I patiently waiting for a reversal, or am I simply refHot Coin Data Ranking|Last 15 Minutes
$ETH decline accompanied by active selling, open interest basically flat: 15-minute price -0.42%, active buying 35.0%, volume 2.3 times. Short-term weakness with volume support, open interest scale did not expand synchronously.Bitcoin ETFs have seen net inflows for 9 consecutive days, totaling about $3.08 billion, but the inflow pace has clearly slowed in the last three days, with only $66.19 million on September 29. On the other hand, ETH ETFs, after 7 consecutive days of inflows totaling $851 million, experienced a net outflow of $2.81 million on September 29. Money is still flowing into BTC, but at a slower rate, while ETH has started to flow out.
This shift is more important than the price itself. Previously, ETH ETFs were attracting funds in sync with BTC, but the sudden divergence indicates that institutional short-term preferences for the two assets have changed. BTC can still hold because its ETF buying momentum has inertia, but the decreasing inflows mean fewer funds chasing higher prices. Although ETH's outflow is only $2.81 million and not large, the signal is not good. If ETH continues to see outflows in the coming days, the overall sentiment in the crypto market will be dragged down, making it difficult for BTC to remain unaffected.
For BTC, short-term support is around 82,000, with strong resistance still at 85,000 above. The slowdown in fund inflows combined with ETH's diversion increases the difficulty of an upward breakout in the short term. With non-farm payroll data yet to be released, large funds are hesitant to move recklessly, so the market is likely to continue oscillating.$ZEC failed to hold 1400 today, does that mean it will definitely reach 1300 tomorrow? I don't think so, because right now they are operating in an up-and-down sweep mode.
Looking at the market, ZEC has fallen from a high of 1698 to 1404, with each rebound peak getting lower, which looks like a downtrend. But look at the long-short ratio in the screenshot: long positions account for 43.33%, short positions 56.67%, with a long-short ratio of 0.76. Shorts actually dominate, which means the market makers won't let shorts easily profit. Under this structure, big rises and big falls are difficult; it's more likely to be repeated tug-of-war, sweeping both hesitant longs and shorts out.
Looking at the latest news, there are several important signals. Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss publicly expressed a bullish stance, stating that the current market sentiment for Zcash is very similar to Bitcoin in 2019. Meanwhile, a huge whale withdrew 2000 ZEC from Binance, consolidating it into a main holding address, which currently holds about $66.19 million worth of ZEC—large funds are withdrawing and locking tokens. The NU7 upgrade schedule is also set: testnet activation on October 6, official launch on November 5, with block time reduced from 75 seconds to 25 seconds.
Technically, ZEC broke below the key support at 1500, the 14-day RSI fell to 53.41, indicating weakened buying pressure. The key support below is at 1350-1400, with resistance above at 1420-1450. Imagine working diligently at a job your whole life.
Decades of sweat, slowly accumulating wealth.
But currency can be continuously issued, and inflation is that invisible thief quietly diluting the fruits of your twenty years of labor.
All fiat currency systems have this weakness: there is no ceiling on the money supply.
What makes Bitcoin most special is that its total supply is locked at 21 million coins. It has no printing press; no one can arbitrarily increase its supply.
Many people invest regularly in BTC essentially to combat the wealth dilution caused by unlimited money printing.
$BTC Neither rising nor falling can gain momentum, how long will this market consolidation last?
$BTC surged again today, reaching around 84300, but the familiar script played out once more: a spike, a loss of momentum, and a return to around 83000.
The support between 83000-82500 is holding firm below, while resistance at 85000 is suffocating above. Bulls and bears are tugging back and forth within these few thousand points, trading T to numbness; ironically, the most helpless stance now is to hold tight.
$ETH, however, is clearly stronger, climbing to 2720 before pulling back to 2680, then quickly stabilizing near 2690, with a smaller drop compared to BTC.
But don’t get excited too soon.
The more it resists falling, the more you need to watch out for a bull trap.
If ETH starts attracting chasing buyers and the chips are mostly accumulated, the real scythe might just fall.
Next, keep a close eye on 2650-2630; as long as it doesn’t break below, expect continued consolidation; if it breaks, then redefine the direction.