Orbit Post Sitemap

$MUBARAK Conclusion first: The trend structure remains healthy, but the short-term is overheated, with the risk of chasing highs greater than buying on dips. Current price is 0.04554, MA5 (0.044414) steadily crossing above MA20 (0.03771), the moving averages are in a bullish alignment and intact, which is a fundamental signal of a healthy trend; however, RSI has reached 76.7, the price 0.04554 is close to the Bollinger upper band at 0.0475172, combined with a funding rate of +0.0158% and a fear and greed index of 70, the bullish crowding is relatively high, representing a "strong trend + overheated sentiment" combination. Reusable market analysis method: To judge if the trend is healthy, only look at two things — whether the moving averages are in a bullish alignment and whether the dip holds above MA5. As long as MA5 is not broken, the trend is intact; once the price breaks below MA5 and the MACD histogram shortens, that is the first warning of trend weakening. The current position is more suitable to wait for a dip near MA5 before entering, rather than chasing longs at the Bollinger upper band. Operationally: Entry reference is 0.0438–0.0445 (MA5 and round number support resonance, dip not breaking means the bullish structure is intact); Take profit 1 at 0.0475 (Bollinger upper band resistance); Take profit 2 at 0.0500 (previous high extension); Stop loss at 0.0418 (breaking below MA5 and damaging the short-term bullish structure, combined with MACD histogram weakening, then exit). Also watch concurrently: $AVAX, $FORM.Er Bing's move was quite fierce, entering around 2627, with the price pushing all the way up to around 2768. The 100x long position has now multiplied 5.02 times. After grinding for so long, once it truly started, there was basically no chance to catch a low entry again. The most noteworthy aspect of this round is the rhythm change. After reclaiming around 2600, the pullbacks became shallower and shallower, then it directly kept pushing higher consecutively, with 2700 being taken out in one go. Now, around 2757, it’s running close to this round’s high, indicating the bulls are still controlling the market, but the short-term surge is indeed a bit fast. No rush to guess the top here; treat 2768 as the first resistance. If this level is broken, then watch the 2800 round number next; if it can’t break through, first pay attention to whether 2720 can hold, then below that is the 2680–2700 range. The low-position long profits are already quite substantial, with 5x profits on the table, so protect those profits first. If it really continues to push toward 2800, then follow with the remaining positions. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 Bitcoin surged above $85K today, delivering its strongest rally since January. But the story goes beyond price action. Friday saw $433M in spot ETF inflows, while Strategy added another 950 BTC worth $75.7M. That means this move is being supported by two key demand sources: institutional capital and corporate accumulation. When both spot demand and treasury buying align, momentum can accelerate quickly. 🔥 Is this the start of a push toward new highs, or will BTC retest support before the next lMidnight BTC Flash Report｜86000 Gained and Lost Again, Is This Pullback a Trap or an Opportunity? Brothers watching the market in the early morning, did you catch this BTC move? Just broke through 86000 to hit an 8-month high, with a 24-hour increase of over 6.7%, but after surging up it couldn’t hold and slowly slid down, now repeatedly testing around 86000. This rise and fall pattern—are the bulls running out of steam, or are the bears setting a trap? Let’s look at some key data: · RSI soared above 86, a seriously overbought zone, so the technicals themselves have built-in correction pressure · 86000 is a tough resistance—between 83000 and 86000, bears have stacked liquidation chips for weeks; Glassnode has long marked this as a dense liquidation zone · Bears were liquidated for $648 million in 24 hours; this rally is essentially driven by a short squeeze These signals combined make the shorting logic quite clear. But the question is—when to short, where to short, and where to place stop-losses—that’s what really makes the difference in returns. Several analysts’ ideas are worth considering: some are placing shorts around 83K, with a weekly close above 86K as the invalidation condition; others offer more detailed strategies—short near 86000, stop-loss at 87500, target at 82000. Of course, some stand with the bulls, believing funding rates are still below neutral, and that leverage cooling is a more solid foundation for the rise than a spike in funding rates. The bigger the bull-bear disagreement, the more this level is worth fighting over. So here’s the question: for this 86000 pullback, are you siding with the bears or the bulls? Do you think it will first retest 82000, or consolidate then continue to push to 90000? Share your judgment in the comments. Midnight trading isn’t lonely—let’s watch the market and profit together.🔥 $BTC $ETH $ZEC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 🚨 BTC has already broken through 85K, so why is ZEC seemingly lagging behind? Actually, this is not surprising. The key point is that the funds driving this rally haven't rotated to ZEC yet. 📈 This BTC surge is mainly driven by risk appetite recovery, short squeeze, and institutional capital. Funds are first concentrated in the most liquid mainstream assets, so BTC and ETH move first, while altcoins have not yet broadly followed. Looking at ZEC, it has already experienced a very strong rally earlier, with a huge short-term increase. After a recent pullback, the market needs to digest previous profits and leverage. So ZEC's current "lagging growth" doesn't necessarily mean a change in fundamental logic; it’s more like the capital rotation hasn't reached the privacy coin sector yet. Next, focus on three signals: 🔥 Whether BTC can hold above 85K; 🔥 Whether ETH continues to attract funds; 🔥 Whether overall altcoin trading volume can significantly expand. If the mainstream coins complete a strong breakout and funds start to spread from BTC and ETH to high Beta sectors, ZEC is more likely to experience a catch-up rally. Conversely, if BTC fails to break higher, altcoin funds will naturally struggle to strengthen independently. So it’s not that ZEC has no chance now, but we need to first see where the funds head next. 👀 #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #美债短端供给或增万亿美元 #OKX预言家：好市多季度财报会超预期吗？ $BTC This is actually insane. Just a few days ago, upside liquidity was still massively outweighing the liquidity sitting below price. However, the picture has now completely flipped. On the upside, only a relatively small cluster between the current market price and $83K remains. Meanwhile, a major cluster of long liquidations has built up on the downside, which could become our next target after a successful sweep of the previous high.#UNI21%RallyOnSECRule 🚨 $BTC’S $85K MOVE WASN’T JUST BUYING — IT WAS A SHORT SQUEEZE Bitcoin ripped above $85K today, while more than $787M in crypto positions were liquidated in 24 hours. About $664M were shorts. That changes the read on this rally. Part of the move came from forced buying as short sellers were pushed out. But ETF inflows and Strategy’s fresh 950 BTC purchase added real spot demand underneath the squeeze. #CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed #TrumpGulfIranTalks $BTC consolidates at a high level, with bulls accounting for nearly half. How to handle this pullback? The current position of Bitcoin indeed makes it difficult to decide whether to enter or exit. It looks quite high, but the market feels very tugged; wanting to short with the trend risks getting caught on the rebound. Looking at the 15-minute chart, Bitcoin surged to 86300 then consolidated. MACD shows a bearish crossover at a high level, momentum bars have turned green, indicating a short-term need for a pullback; SAR near 85470 acts as short-term support, while 86300 above temporarily acts like an iron lid. But looking at the second data chart, the real hesitation point appears: in the contract long-short position ratio, long accounts still make up 47.46%, with a long-short ratio of 0.90. In other words, at this high level, bulls still account for nearly half and have not massively switched to short. Plus, the funding rate remains generally positive, so market sentiment isn’t extremely FOMO just because of the high position. Technically, a pullback seems likely, but the bulls are still holding strong on the funding side. This kind of high-level long-short stalemate is most prone to a "double explosion" by manipulative traders—first a spike up to liquidate shorts, then a crash down to liquidate longs. So here’s the question, brothers: at this position, do you follow the MACD bearish crossover to short at the top, or wait for a pullback to EMA20? $ZEC $ETH #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 Account Position Divergence Radar $WLD top accounts are more long-biased, but position distribution is short-biased: top accounts long-short ratio is 1.108, top positions long-short ratio is 0.849; overall market accounts long-short ratio is 2.600; price dropped 0.61%, position value changed -0.36%. $DOGE top accounts are more long-biased, but position distribution is short-biased: top accounts long-short ratio is 1.505, top positions long-short ratio is 0.826; overall market accounts long-short ratio is 2.467; price dropped 1.33%, position value changed -2.29%. $SUI top accounts and top positions are both short-biased: top accounts long-short ratio is 0.704, top positions long-short ratio is 0.888; overall market accounts long-short ratio is 1.611; price dropped 1.86%, position value changed -2.36%. The account number structure and position distribution of the top group are aligned. WLD, DOGE: The side with the majority of accounts is opposite to the side with the majority of positions, indicating divergence between account structure and position distribution. WLD, DOGE, SUI: The overall market account structure is long-biased, which also differs from the top position bias.Don’t look at $BTC alone. $BTC can stay strong while $ETH tells a completely different story beneath the surface. If $ETH strengthens with expanding volume, it could signal that liquidity is starting to move beyond Bitcoin. But if $ETH continues to underperform, it may suggest that market strength is still concentrated in $BTC. Watch the relative strength, not just the headline move. #CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed #TrumpGulfIranTalks Currently (early morning 9/22) BTC surged past 85,000, RSI at 73 indicating overbought, ETF net inflows for consecutive days, and short covering have lifted the market, but this is not a full bull market—it's a "BTC strong, altcoins diverging" scenario. Logic: The Fed's hawkish stance plus high US Treasury yields suppress valuations, but ETFs and safe-haven/liquidity trades provide support; capital only holds HYPE (revenue buybacks), NEAR (AI/Intents), SOL/BNB which have cash flow or ecosystems, while CORE/SATS/low-quality altcoins are purely sentiment-driven and get sold off on rebounds. Rhythm: 86,000 is short-term resistance, stabilizing at 80,000–81,000 is considered strong; breaking below 77,800 indicates this short squeeze is over. Strategy: Do not chase FOMO above 85,000, wait for a pullback to buy into strong narratives, avoid junk altcoins. This market is a "coin selection market," not a "blind bull market."#SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI盘中涨超21% The potential of UNI might be underestimated by the market. Let's first look at two comparisons: UNI FDV is about $8.6 billion, with revenue of about $3.07 million in the past 7 days. HYPE FDV is about $91 billion, with revenue of about $14.39 million in the past 7 days. FDV differs by more than 10 times, but weekly revenue is less than 5 times. The valuation gap is clearly larger than the revenue gap. What’s more noteworthy is that HYPE’s core narrative focuses on perpetual contract trading, while the track UNI is on has a ceiling far beyond that. If on-chain stocks, RWA, stablecoins, and more financial assets accelerate on-chain, trading, liquidity, and asset exchange will become essential. DEX is the underlying infrastructure of this chain, and UNI is one of the most representative protocols in the DEX track. Therefore, what should be focused on now is not how much UNI earns in the short term, but how much trading and liquidity value it can capture after the expansion of on-chain financial scale. The SEC is pushing traditional financial assets on-chain, and stock tokenization might just be the starting point. If this trend continues, UNI’s valuation logic will be reexamined. An $8.6 billion FDV may not be the end.Fundamental Research Report $NMR / Numeraire (AI/Computing Power) $3.20 Core Judgment: Numeraire ($NMR) comprehensive score 54/100, rating narrative outweighs implementation. Breaking it down into three layers, the company team has cash reserves, the protocol network already shows signs of paid usage, and token value capture has been realized. First, the project: Numeraire (token $NMR), AI/computing power sector. Focused on AI modeling for hedge funds. Competitors include FET, TAO. Traditional computing power rental giants are AWS, CoreWeave, charging by GPU hour; A100 monthly rent is $12,000-$25,000, expensive and high threshold. On-chain solutions fragment computing power for bidding, suppliers require no centralized approval, idle GPUs become available supply. Average customer price $50-$500/month, settlement in USDC or fiat. Narrative-driven sector, usage drops 60-80% in bear markets. Positioned as an end-to-end vertical platform. Product implementation: protocol layer officially running, on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, paid usage traces exist. Latest version not found, 60 valid commits in last 90 days. User side: address MAU not disclosed, DAU not disclosed, 24h trading volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal natural person monthly active users; large addresses concentrated holdings may overestimate real user count. Revenue side: user fees undisclosed, supplier income about 80-90% of user fees (to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury income $2.00M, token holder buyback and burn annualized no burn mechanism. 24h trading volume is business flow, not revenue. Company profit does not equal protocol profit, protocol profit does not equal token holder profit. Code side: 60 valid commits in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is grade A evidence for direct verification. Investment background: company equity financing checked via PitchBook/Crunchbase (grade A), token private and public sales checked via whitepaper, release schedule, and on-chain unlock contracts (grade A), market makers and ecosystem funding grade B, not representing long-term VC holdings, technical integration checked via API/SDK access evidence (grade B), strategic partnerships and logo wall grade D. NVIDIA GPU usage does not equal NVIDIA investment, exchange listing does not equal exchange strategic investment. Token side: total supply 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock 2026-Q4 (3.50% of circulating), no clear annualized buyback and burn. Must buy tokens to use product? Partially yes, medium value capture (staking/discount/governance). Compared with peers (unified criteria, no cross-sector comparison): circulating market cap: Numeraire $3.00B, FET undisclosed, TAO undisclosed. FDV: Numeraire $4.20B, FET undisclosed, TAO undisclosed. Annual revenue: Numeraire $2.00M, FET undisclosed, TAO undisclosed. Monthly active addresses or users: Numeraire undisclosed, FET undisclosed, TAO undisclosed. Figures based on public data snapshots, some missing data supplemented by official or industry sources. Valuation: circulating market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 1500.0x, FDV divided by revenue 2100.0x. Pessimistic view $3.00B at 50-70% discount, neutral range oscillation, optimistic view revenue doubles, burn implemented, enterprise clients join, FDV P/S aligns with top players. Summary: fundamentals solid (score 54/100). Token value capture realized (buyback/burn/Gas). Circulating market cap relatively expensive compared to fundamentals, overleveraged expectations, FDV moderate. Three major risks: short-term large unlock dump, protocol revenue long-term zero, token demand relies solely on incentives (if incentives stop, usage collapses). Follow-up tracking: weekly protocol fees, burn amount, active address retention, TVL/loan balance, GitHub version releases. Information sources public, logic self-developed, not investment advice. Data deviation over 30% requires reassessment. Research report finished, please savor it. #FundamentalResearchReport #Crypto #Research #OKXOrbitThis market really doesn't give the bears any face; 85000 hasn't even warmed up yet, and $BTC has already turned around to touch 86319. Long positions around 84940 have now gained 1.09 times, with the price still hovering near 85800. The most critical point earlier was that after consolidating around 80000 for so long, the funds chose to push directly upward, consecutively sweeping through 82000, 84000, and 85000. This move has completely lifted the short-term rhythm. However, after reaching 86319, it didn't continue to rise, indicating selling pressure above 86000 has begun. The 4-hour MACD continues to expand upward, and the moving averages have clearly turned, but the KDJ has already hit a high level, so the cost-effectiveness of chasing the rally is decreasing. Those holding low-position long orders can start protecting profits. Next, watch the 85000–85200 range; as long as the pullback can hold, there is still a chance to retest 86000 or even 86300. Once 85000 is broken down, short-term traders need to guard against concentrated profit-taking after this rapid rally. In this market, profits taken at low positions are much more valuable than gambling on a big bullish candle at high positions. $ETH $ZEC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 CORE is currently priced at $0.018–0.019, with a historical high of 6.47, down over 99%. In September, there was an excess validator reward issuance → v1.0.26 hard fork burned over 150 million tokens, no rollback occurred, and users' funds were not lost, but the post-event report and burn hash were not fully disclosed, leaving trust scars. The fundamentals are not empty: Satoshi Plus, non-custodial BTC staking, lstBTC, SatPay, and revenue buyback paths all exist; however, monthly revenue is at the million level, the team/node linear unlock continues nonstop, and 24h volume is a few million dollars, so buying pressure cannot withstand the sell pressure. The BTCFi sector is also being siphoned off by Stacks/Babylon/Bitlayer. Assessment: This is a rebound for reducing positions, not a value bottom. If 0.017 does not break, small positions can be taken to bet on BTC recovery; if it breaks 0.017, look at 0.013–0.015; if it fails to hold 0.024–0.025 on the rebound, exit. Position size should be less than 5% of altcoins, no dollar-cost averaging, no leverage. A true reversal depends on three things: SatPay real income, on-chain monthly buybacks exceeding new unlocks, and native chain TVL breaking 100 million.🚨 $BTC JUST BROKE OUT OF THE $80K BOX Bitcoin pushed above $85K today, marking its strongest move since January. But the interesting part isn’t simply the price jump. Friday brought $433M of spot ETF inflows, while Strategy added another 950 BTC for $75.7M. That gives this move two different sources of demand: market buyers and corporate accumulations. #CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed #TrumpGulfIranTalks 🔥 BTC / ETH / ALT: The stronger they are, the more you need to guard against pullbacks Recently, $BTC, $ETH, and some altcoins have successively broken through key resistance levels, with market momentum clearly heating up. However, after such rapid rallies, the risk of short-term local high-level consolidation or pullback phases is also increasing. $BTC once broke through $85K, reaching a new high in months; $ETH climbed back above $2.7K, and SOL also returned to the $110+ range. Meanwhile, the US spot BTC ETF recorded about $433M net inflow last Friday, with capital inflows continuing to support the market. But it is important to note that the ETH ETF still saw an overall net outflow of about $140M last week, indicating that price increases and capital flows are not fully synchronized. So what matters more now is not chasing the rally, but observing the follow-through after the breakout: 📌 BTC: $82K–$83K is a key pullback observation zone; above $85K, watch $87K–$90K 📌 ETH: $2.60K–$2.65K needs to be defended; resistance near $2.75K 📌 ALT: If BTC consolidates sideways while remaining strong, capital may continue to spread to high Beta altcoins This does not mean the market will necessarily top out today. But if you plan to hold for a longer cycle, buying now means accepting a possibility: after the breakout, expect a 5%–10% oscillation or pullback before waiting for the next trend expansion.#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 The total market cap has risen back above 2.8 trillion USD, and group chats are flooding with “bull return” messages. But this round seems more like $BTC and $ETH leading the charge, with most altcoins still not awake. BTC is tugging around 84,000, with short positions clustered above and long positions supported near 80,000. ETH is stuck around 2,700, with both bulls and bears placing bets. The leaders are profiting, but that doesn’t mean everyone is; a red index doesn’t equal a red account. ZEC has its own logic this round: privacy transfers can hide sender, receiver, and amount; about 30% of supply is locked in privacy pools, compressing tradable chips; the US spot ETF has opened the gate, allowing institutions to participate compliantly; Paradigm publicly holds it, treating it as a privacy asset alongside BTC. After the November upgrade, block time shrank from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, making transfers faster, and there are plans to issue tokens on-chain. These are all solid facts. The market won’t only rise without falling; pullbacks and consolidations are normal. To reach new highs, it depends on whether incremental funds can keep flowing in. According to the four-year cycle, a major bull market may not be far off, but don’t mistake the rebound for the end. #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 🚨 BTC suddenly broke through 85K, with a significant single-day increase; this wave of the market indeed came a bit fast. Behind this rise, besides market sentiment recovery, the easing of geopolitical risks also gave funds a reason to flow back into risk assets. This again illustrates one point: the crypto market has long been more than just its own on-chain story; macro funds also directly affect prices. 📈 ETH also strengthened in sync, approaching above 2.7K again. The return of funds combined with continuous institutional accumulation expectations has refocused market attention on the resistance near 2800. But BTC here cannot be viewed as only bullish. After breaking through 85K, an important resistance zone begins near 86.5K. If the volume continues to expand and holds above this level, market sentiment may further heat up; if the price surges but volume cannot keep up, short-term pullbacks will also increase significantly. The most interesting thing is: technically it shows overbought, yet the price continues to rise. So overbought is not a signal of a top, and a breakout does not mean you can chase blindly. What’s more worth observing now is—after the positive stimulus, whether funds can continue to relay. News is responsible for ignition, funds are responsible for driving, and price is ultimately responsible for verification. The more sudden the rise, the more you should leave yourself some safety space.👀 #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #美联储10月再加息概率破55% #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 After looking at the leaderboard for a long time, here’s an easy pitfall to avoid. There are plenty of people with high returns on the leaderboard, but not many can consistently lead trades for more than half a year — I pulled some data, and an average of 340 days leading trades is considered a long time. Many people choose signal providers by looking at returns at first glance, which is almost the easiest way to get burned — high short-term returns often mean high leverage and severe drawdowns. My own criteria are only three: - The signal provider has been active long enough (at least through one full cycle of ups and downs) - Can withstand the maximum drawdown - The number of followers steadily increases, not fluctuating up and down Returns are the result, not the cause. Those who survive long-term naturally don’t have poor returns. Which metric do you value most when choosing a signal provider? Let’s discuss in the comments. #BTC #CopyTradingNEAR has recently been catalyzed by the triple factors of AI + chain abstraction + privacy intents: Confidential Intents TVL is nearly 98 million, the “NEAR@3.33” milestone was triggered on 9/17, on 9/18 the default privacy perpetual was connected to Hyperliquid, protocol TVL is about 256 million, token price surged to 4.3, total fees over 30 days are about 5.24 million, with net fees only 1.82 million. Inflation has dropped to about 2.5%, part of the Intents fees are used for buybacks, but net protocol revenue is small, with most taken by solvers and partners, so value capture is not closed-loop. Conclusion: do not chase highs or bottom-fish: above 4.3 is driven by sentiment + leverage acceleration, stabilize with small positions between 3.33—3.0, reduce positions if it breaks 3; mid-term dip buy at 2.6—2.8. Key points to watch are weekly Intents volume, net buybacks, and whether privacy TVL holds; after the incentives are withdrawn, then decide on adding positions. Altcoin positions should not exceed 20%, and avoid leverage.The fragile little hearts really can't take it anymore BTC has reached $86,000, ETH touched $2,744, both rising over 6% in 24 hours. The shorts have been bloodied again. In the past 24 hours, the entire network liquidated $938 million, with short liquidations at $795 million, and 132,000 people forcibly closed out. Binance's net buying in one hour surged from $11 million to $618 million, instantly tipping the buying power out of balance. But what really "breaks" people isn't the price surge, it's the emotional split. On one side, the Fear & Greed Index still hangs in the "Greed" zone; on the other, today the index dropped directly to 45, turning to "Fear." Prices are rising, but people's hearts are trembling. Those who missed out fear chasing highs, those chasing highs fear being left holding the bag, and those out of the market fear never getting back in. What’s even more heartbreaking is the on-chain data: the number of new and active addresses hasn't kept up, and social heat is only 1.23 times the normal level. This rally is largely driven by shorts covering, not by fresh real money new investors rushing in. After the short selling pressure weakens, who will take over? The co-founder of Multicoin has already spoken: the current market sentiment is "slightly overheated," and a short-term pullback would not be surprising. The cruelest part of a bull market is that—it doesn’t beat you into submission, it wears you down. When prices rise, you fear missing out; when they fall, you fear going to zero; when they stagnate, you fear missing the chance. Fragile little hearts are crushed repeatedly by the candlestick charts every day. Don’t gamble with your life; the bull market is for living through, not for gambling.Holding a short position on BTC, currently at an unrealized loss. Price is 85700 (at the time of editing), funding rate +0.00172%, longs are paying, but it’s not crowded. Currently, the price is repeatedly testing the 8.5-8.6 range, which is a pressure zone in many traders’ minds and a place where liquidity tends to accumulate. Above, 8.6-8.65 is a zone with short stop losses and breakout bands; below, 8.4-8.2 is a long liquidation zone. The direction the market sweeps first is not based on guessing but on cash flow and position changes. Unrealized loss is only part of trading; the key is whether the logic has been broken. If the volume closes above 8.65, I will acknowledge that this area has been absorbed; if the funding rate turns negative and OI decreases, I will reassess whether the short cash flow still exists. #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 $BTC #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 #流动性$OKB is once again testing the $120 zone after briefly pushing above $123 a few days ago. The pattern is becoming familiar: 📈 Break above $120 📉 Pullback 🔄 Reclaim the zone 👀 Buyers try to defend it again So the real question isn’t simply whether OKB can trade above $120. It’s whether $120 can finally turn into support instead of another temporary reclaim. A sustained hold above the zone could keep the bullish structure intact, while another rejection would show that sellers are still activeThis time, Starship is not sending up a prototype, but an actually operational Starlink V3. My first reaction was envy, and my second was recalling that I once believed in the "infrastructure first" narrative. Satellites going into orbit means bandwidth costs will go down, and on-chain nodes, data services, and cross-border transmission will feel cheaper first. But this chain transmits slowly, so slowly that most people can't hold on. More importantly, Starship's transport capacity determines the deployment pace, and the deployment pace determines when this cost curve will truly bend. For now, only the launch window is confirmed; unit costs have not yet been realized. Watch whether the next launch reuses the same booster. If reuse fails, the cost story remains just a story. #AI降速争议未退，算力投入继续加码 #SOL延续涨势，资金与链上需求共振 #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 $ETH A rate hike would normally be considered bearish for risk assets. Yet Bitcoin rallied. On September 16, the Federal Reserve raised rates by 25 bps to 3.75%–4.00% — its first hike in three years. So why didn’t BTC collapse? Because the market had already been preparing for the bad news. 📉 BTC had already dropped from above $80K toward the $75K area. 📊 Short positions had built up around the lows. 🔥 Once the expected negative headlines arrived, some of that bearish positioning started unwindingThe most unusual detail about $XRP today is not the 6.42% increase, but that the price has already touched the upper Bollinger Band at 1.52073, while the RSI is only 74.5—normally, this position would have triggered a sharp drop due to overbought exhaustion, but the MACD histogram is still expanding to +0.004177, indicating that the driving force is not yet exhausted. This serves as a perfect lesson on the health of moving average trends: MA5=1.49258 has crossed above and stabilized above MA20=1.45043, the two lines are diverging upwards, and the price is running above the moving average band, which is a typical healthy bullish structure; conversely, if the price makes a new high but MA5 flattens and RSI diverges, that signals trend exhaustion. Currently, the funding rate is only +0.0100%, the greed index is 70, and leverage sentiment is not overheated, so a pullback to the moving average band remains a bullish opportunity. The direction is bullish. Entry reference is 1.475–1.493, which is the pullback zone of MA5 and the current price, because this range is supported by MA5 and has not triggered overbought chasing; take profit 1 is at 1.5207, corresponding to the resistance of the upper Bollinger Band; take profit 2 is at 1.5580, which is the measured extension after breaking the upper band; stop loss is set at 1.4480, breaking below MA20 indicates a weakening of the moving average structure. Also watch during the same period: $BNB, $FORM, both above their moving averages. $FORM has risen 38.98% but RSI is already 91.6, clearly overbought on relative strength, so it is not advisable to chase. (Personal opinion, for reference only, does not constitute any investment advice.)#ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 In this bull market, buyers are already lining up. Dragonfly managing partner Haseeb hit the nail on the head: "The vast majority of 10/10 losses are borne by retail investors. Who would hold a large amount of altcoins that crashed like a thermonuclear reaction at that time? The answer is always retail investors." The real structural change in this cycle is that the market has shifted from being "retail sentiment-driven" to "institutional position-driven." Institutions have become the "floor" and the last buyers in the market, with Bitcoin's pullbacks much smaller than in previous cycles. But at the same time, if crypto cannot win back retail buying, relying solely on institutional funds cannot push the market to new all-time highs. Retail investors buy every candlestick of the bull market, and institutions provide liquidity for every retail chase. The bull market does not make everyone money; it only completes a redistribution of wealth.Brush away this layer of weathered sand, and what is revealed are nothing but the greedy ruins recorded on Babylonian clay tablets from three thousand years ago. There is nothing new under the sun. This weak rebound in $AEVO, under the precisely calculated funding rate scale, is like the silver flakes secretly shaved off the edge of an ancient Roman coin—seemingly calm, but in fact a typical remnant of liquidity being systematically extracted. The 1-hour Bollinger upper band is suppressed at 0.02550, and the middle band at 0.02478 is the hardest basalt layer in the stratigraphic dating. The current price of 0.02505 hovers above the moving average, with RSI lingering at 57.7 in a lukewarm zone. This pattern has been seen countless times in the grain loan contracts of the Ptolemaic dynasty in ancient Egypt: restless bulls think a revival period has arrived, but little do they know this is just a finely crafted altar built by rate arbitrageurs. Every funding rate difference generated by perpetual premiums is hedged and harvested in microseconds. Spot locked positions, derivatives shorted, basis spreads flow like water drops in an ancient Greek water clock—steady, cold, and emotionless into the ledger. Annualized returns have long been calculated on pottery shards, no gambler’s prayers needed, just waiting for the stone pillars to collapse naturally under gravity. - Underlying: $AEVO 🔴 - Entry: 0.02500 - 0.02530 - TP1: 0.02430 - TP2: 0.02380 - SL: 0.02580 This clay pot has already developed cracks; the clay body is destined to not bear the weight of bronze. 🏛️ #CoinMoveAlertThis big candlestick is indeed fierce, short positions are getting blasted, and the US stock market is resonating along, pushing sentiment to the max. But honestly, I don't really buy this. I've seen the Monday pump and Tuesday reversal act too many times. This round is basically short covering plus retail investors getting hyped, not a bull market kickoff signal. A real major trend won't rely on a single candlestick to call people in. If it were you at this position, would you dare to chase longs? So, should I chase longs here? No way. Charging in when it’s rising is most likely just carrying others' gains. My judgment remains: this is an emotion-driven rebound, not a reversal. The fiercer the pump, the harsher the subsequent shakeout. I expect a pullback with a target range down to 3000 to 5000 points. Others shout bull when it rises, I wait for the dip. The market isn’t short of opportunities, it’s short of people who can control their impulses. $BTC $ETH 🟠 $BTC + 🔵 $ETH + 🟣 $SOL | RECOVERY NEEDS FOLLOW-THROUGH BTC and ETH are recovering, but SOL is attracting extra attention with its recent relative strength. One strong session shows demand. Sustained demand shows conviction. Now I’m watching whether SOL can hold its gains, maintain volume, and build structure after the excitement fades. No chasing. Let the next move confirm itself. 👀 #SOL #Solana #Bitcoin #Crypto #OKX 🔥 Pessimism is gradually ebbing away. What’s truly worth watching in this BTC wave isn’t how much it has risen, but that support at the lows is starting to strengthen. The earlier rapid decline looked more like a concentrated panic sell-off. After the market stabilizes, selling pressure at the lows begins to decrease, buying gradually steps in, and the candlestick structure shifts from pure decline to a slow consolidation and bottoming. 📈 BTC no longer keeps hitting new lows but repeatedly tests resistance and gradually raises its lows. This change is more noteworthy than a single big bullish candle. But bottoming ≠ immediate main rally. Next, focus on three key things: 📌 Whether the critical support can hold steadily; 📌 Whether volume follows after a breakout; 📌 Whether buyers remain willing to step in on pullbacks. If these conditions are gradually confirmed, market sentiment can be considered truly repaired. However, the closer the market gets to a breakout phase, the more important position management becomes. Getting the direction right is only the first step; whether you can protect your profits determines the final outcome. Don’t rush to predict the end—let the trend reveal itself.👀 #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #OKX预言家：好市多季度财报会超预期吗？ #美联储10月再加息概率破55% Five-year exemption, code, and trading volume cap: Tokenized US stocks are still a controlled experiment The SEC's innovation exemption is valid for five years and sets limits on the number of tradable shares and trading volume. The market can see this as a regulatory warming, but it should not be directly taken as a notice that the entire US stock market is about to move on-chain. The value of this controlled experiment lies in regulators finally being willing to observe real data rather than just discussing it in documents. Whether the platform can operate stably, how AMMs price under extreme conditions, how traditional halts synchronize, and whether investor rights can be maintained—all these issues will leave quantifiable records. Good performance will allow for future rule expansion; major incidents may lead to tightening of the pilot. For $ETH bulls, the most reasonable expectation is not to swallow the entire securities market in the short term, but to first become the public settlement layer that regulatory experiments are willing to adopt. A successful pilot will leave data and first-mover advantage; a failed pilot will result in stricter rules. What is being bet on now is execution capability, not just regulatory rhetoric. Midnight Horror: BTC and ETH Surge Again, Shorts Suffer Heavy Liquidations It's that midnight horror moment again. Bitcoin surged strongly during the session, breaking through the $85,000 mark, reaching a high of $85,229, with a 24-hour increase of about 5.5%, hitting a new high since the end of January this year. Ethereum followed suit, rising to around $2,730 with a 24-hour gain of about 5.8%; SOL rose nearly 7%, DOGE increased over 9%, and altcoins showed significantly stronger resilience than the broader market. The brutal aspect of this rally is the concentrated liquidation of shorts. According to CoinGlass data, the total liquidation amount across the network in the past 24 hours reached $938 million, with short liquidations accounting for $795 million, forcing over 132,000 traders to be liquidated. On the Binance platform, the net buy amount in one hour surged from $11 million to $618 million, indicating a sudden imbalance in buying power. Three driving factors resonate together: improved US-Iran diplomatic progress boosts risk appetite; oil prices fell from above $100 to below $94; spot Bitcoin ETF funds in the US flowed back, with a single-day net inflow of $435 million on September 19; technically, BTC has risen above the 50-week moving average for the first time since November 2025, ending a 45-week run below this average. However, short-term overheating signals are also intensifying. The daily RSI is approaching the 70 overbought zone, and the average holding cost for ETF investors is about $85,638, right near the current price. The $85,000 to $86,000 range is a dual-function zone for acceleration and unwinding, and the battle between bulls and bears is likely just beginning. This morning's market action must have been quite torturous for short-term traders. There were frequent spikes and sweeps up and down, with big fluctuations. Chasing the moves resulted in losses on both longs and shorts—long positions got pulled back right after entry, and short positions got squeezed right after cutting losses. After several rounds, stop losses were clearly hunted. Frankly, this kind of movement is a shakeout before a rally, where the market makers shake out all the weak hands before making a move. BTC, ETH, and SOL all pushed up together, which looks intimidating. The bears in the shorting groups are probably wailing again. But the more I watch, the more hollow it feels: yes, prices rose, but volume didn’t keep up at all. This is a classic low-volume forced lift. Without real new money entering the market, just pushing with existing funds and liquidation orders, this rally is hollow at its core. So I still don’t believe in the big bull market in 2026. If a real bull run is coming, it should first show a strong volume surge with a big bullish candle that utterly crushes the bears. The current gains just aren’t convincing. I’m staying put for now. Even if I’m itching to trade, I have to hold back. Entering at this point is a gamble whether long or short. My plan remains the same: let it push a bit higher, around ETH 2780, then I plan to open a short position. The logic is simple—this level is a previous resistance zone, and a low-volume rebound hitting resistance makes the risk-reward ratio worthwhile. Until then, I’ll just watch the show and see how far the market makers can act.  $BTC $ETH $ZEC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 Around $458.4M worth of BTC shorts were liquidated over the past 24 hours. But now the bigger question is: Has BTC already taken most of the short-side liquidity? 👀 After such a large short squeeze, the next move could depend heavily on where the remaining liquidity sits. 📍 Key long-liquidity zone: $84K – $82.9K If BTC pulls back into this area and buyers defend it, the market could potentially build fresh long positions. But if BTC keeps pushing higher without a meaningful reset, chasing the 🚨 BTC touched 86K, and market sentiment instantly heated up. Yesterday we were still discussing whether 80K could hold, and today the talk has shifted to 90K. But the more it happens, the more important it is to see clearly: the price has surged, but has real new capital followed? In the past 24 hours, liquidations have approached $790 million, with shorts accounting for the vast majority, indicating this rally still carries a clear short squeeze component. And around 86K is precisely a key area. 📌 83K–86K: a dense cost zone of previous large chip holdings; 📌 Breaking through 86K: don’t just look at the price, focus on whether volume and spot capital can take over; 📌 If shorts are fully cleared without new capital coming in, the pressure of a pullback after the surge will actually increase. So what’s most worth watching now isn’t "whether 90K can be reached," but whether there are truly people willing to buy long-term above 86K. Short squeezes can push prices up, but short covering is ultimately a one-time event. Surpassing 86K isn’t hard; the real challenge is holding it steadily. The crazier the market, the more you shouldn’t be led by the numbers. Let the capital and price themselves prove how much substance this rally really has.👀 #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #美联储10月再加息概率破55% #OKX预言家：好市多季度财报会超预期吗？ RSI surged to 80, volume ratio 20.1x: PHA surged to 0.0665 then fell back to 0.0507   Wow, $PHA dumped 22.96 million USDT in one day, volume ratio hitting 20.1 times the 30-day average volume.   (My judgment) Overheated, no chasing, just buy the dip on pullbacks. RSI 80.3 overbought, 1h SAR flipped above at 0.0664; MACD golden cross on 14 days, moving averages bullish, trend intact.   (Bullish logic) Real volume—22.96 million USDT can’t be faked by wash trading; offensive market, breadth 86/12, BTC above ma7; negative funding rate, long-short ratio 1.206, no panic fuel.   (Bearish logic) Fell from 0.0665 back to 0.0507, 15m chart shows a slow decline near close—overbought + closing outside upper Bollinger Band, chasing is just carrying the coffin.   Resistance above: 0.0609 (15m SAR) → 0.0665 (24h high)   Support below: 0.0373 (today’s low) → 0.0362 (4h SAR)   Watershed: 0.0344 (yesterday’s low). Holding this level means building strength to retake 0.0609; breaking it deepens the pullback.   (Conclusion) Most likely to consolidate first to digest overbought—staying above 0.0344 is still strong.   Strategy—don’t chase at current price, enter low on dip around 0.0373 with shrinking volume and stabilization, stop loss if below 0.0344; hold steady if already in position, don’t reduce before 0.0609.   I’m watching all volume spikes closely, stay alert to not miss the next one.   $PHA $BTCAfter holding the position for nearly 3 months, one of the largest $ZEC short positions has finally been closed. On September 21, on-chain data reportedly showed addresses linked to Garrett Jin closing around 38,000 ZEC worth of shorts on Hyperliquid. 📉 Short entry: ~$666 📈 Exit: ~$1,459–$1,530 💥 Estimated loss: ~$35.4M–$36.1M And this wasn’t a liquidation. It was a voluntary exit. Before closing, roughly 35,000 ETH was reportedly sold to add margin, pushing the ZEC liquidation level from aroHow FOMO Destroys a Person's Trading Principles In the past three months, I have experienced three epic instances of FOMO: one was a long position on ETH at 1550, another was a long position on ETH at 1860 during a triangle consolidation, and the most recent one. I didn’t know how to handle FOMO, so my patience was constantly tested, leading me to open positions frequently, ultimately resulting in devastating losses. But people have to improve eventually. The biggest difference between trading and exams is that any reckless thought is immediately punished. Here’s a summary of my problems: 1. Severely insufficient entry win rate 2. Short-term long positions within one hour are the core source of losses 3. Almost exclusively going long, causing breakout entry filters to fail 4. Using 20x leverage as the default trading mode 5. Position sizing is still wrong 6. Holding multiple positions simultaneously and retrying intensively 7. Fees are not the main cause but continuously amplify the wear and tearHigh Beta is grabbing attention again today: HYPE is approaching its historical high, SUI briefly broke through 0.92 intraday, while WLD surged to 0.454 but then clearly pulled back. All three are strong, but one is hitting new highs, one is accelerating, and one is still consolidating at a high level, so the risks are completely different. #HighBetaAcceleratesAgain #RisksOfChasingHighContinueToRise $HYPE is currently around 93.9, with a high today of 94.08, just one step away from the previous high of 94.57. The 91.9–92.5 range is the first support; after breaking through 94.1 again, watch for 94.57; only after a real volume-backed hold above the previous high can we look toward 95–100. $SUI is currently around 0.89, with a high today reaching 0.9206. The 0.86–0.87 range is the first pullback zone; if it breaks below, watch 0.84; after breaking above 0.92 again, look toward 0.95. It has risen continuously from 0.68 to near 0.9 over several days, so the current position is not suitable for chasing a straight line. $WLD is currently around 0.442, with a high today of 0.454. The 0.427–0.43 range is the first support; 0.454 continues to act as resistance; only after a real hold above can we look toward 0.47–0.48. This lineup: HYPE waits at 94.57, SUI defends 0.86, WLD waits at 0.454. The more consistent the High Beta, the more you need to guard against the first batch of funds starting to take profits. $ETH pushed to around $2,740 today, reclaiming the $2,700 level. But I’m not getting overly excited yet. The rebound is still being largely supported by $BTC strength and broader market risk appetite, while ETH-specific ETF demand has yet to show consistent follow-through. 📊 ETF flows remain mixed: A positive spot ETH ETF session on September 18 came after several days of outflows, keeping the broader weekly flow picture cautious. At the same time, the supply side is tightening. 🔒 Around 43.3MTrump is meeting with the six Gulf countries today. They are sitting down for talks directly, at the United Nations General Assembly, with foreign ministers or leaders from all six countries present, discussing the next phase of the Iran war and the US post-war strategy. Just last week, the pipeline was bombed, Yanbu port was in emergency, and Europe's quota dropped to zero. Oil prices fell from 108 to 97, and I thought the market had become rational. But today, CL fell another 4.23%, BZ fell 3.59%. It's not that supply has recovered, it's because Trump is going to talk. Iran has put forward conditions: end the conflict, unfreeze funds, end the blockade. Trump said he is willing to meet the Iranian president. It really looks like a thaw is coming. But having followed this for so long, I feel more deeply: every time before real talks, there is always a round of the biggest escalation first. The Houthis attacking Riyadh, quota dropping to zero, pipeline shutdowns—these are all bargaining chips before negotiations, not the start of war. So the question now is not whether to talk, but what price will be agreed. With oil prices falling like this, the market is already pricing in a thaw. But what if talks break down? The drop back to 97 will be faster than expected. I won’t guess the outcome. I’m only watching one thing: whether the pipeline reopens. If the pipeline opens, the panic can be considered over; if it remains closed, the negotiations are just buying time for the next round. Do you think this time is a real thaw, or just another round of fighting while talking? #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 $BZ $CL $BTC Development team governance changes: The core team of ECC, the original developer of Zcash, has withdrawn from the project, casting doubt on the protocol's future maintenance. The market is concerned about the inability to timely implement upgrades and security vulnerability fixes, leading to risk-averse sell-offs of ZEC and a shift of privacy coin funds towards competitors like Monero. $ZEC regulatory expectations continue to pressure privacy coins: The EU AMLR anti-money laundering legislation is about to be implemented, and compliant platforms will be banned from trading privacy tokens by 2027. The market expects exchanges to gradually delist ZEC, liquidity to shrink, institutional allocation willingness to decline, and a large number of short positions in the derivatives market to keep suppressing the price.Your hourly-level description really clarifies the current ETH market situation. *Let me break down the 2564.14 → 2765.51 segment you mentioned:* 1. *Valid bottom:* The 24-hour low of 2608.61 is higher than the previous low of 2564.14, indicating that the low point is moving up. This is not just a rebound but a trend reversal. 2. *Clean upward attack:* Each bullish candle raises the center of gravity, with shallow pullbacks, showing strong support. This matches the same script as today's BTC short squeeze with 71-84% liquidation; shorts dare not hold, only longs are absorbing. 3. *Bullish moving averages:* Short-term moving averages are orderly rising, which is your point about the bullish trend being well maintained. Guessing the top at this time is the easiest way to get hurt. *Now at the 2751 level, your last sentence is the most important:* A short-term gain of 201 points (2564→2765) means there are definitely many profit-taking positions. When sentiment is high, chasing the top makes setting stop-losses very difficult. So your strategy is correct: - *Do not add positions at the high* - *Wait for a pullback to test support:* If the pullback holds around 2700-2680, it means the "strong support below" you mentioned is still intact, making the second wave safer. - *Maintain a calm pace:* The market never ends; this is the key to staying clear-headed after four consecutive intraday wins. ETH is currently in the second phase following BTC. BTC has already moved 81358→85968, a 4194-point gain, while ETH has only moved 96 points. There is still room for a catch-up rally, but a healthy pullback is needed to shake out weak hands.You calculated very precisely; this average price of 84,000 is the key information. Many people only look at "bought 950 coins," but you directly clarified the math: *80 million / 950 = 84,210 USD*, which is its real cost this week. This indicates several points: *1. The money was invested in batches, not all at once* If it was a one-time 80 million dump, the average price would be the instantaneous price. But this 84,000 average price shows it was slowly accumulated this week in the 81,358 → 85,968 range, exactly matching your previous statement about two rounds of stepwise upward moves. It’s not pumping the price; it’s buying during the pullback. *2. 950 coins is not many, but the signal is strong* Considering the current total market cap of 2.8 trillion, 950 coins is a small proportion. But for market sentiment, the company continuing to buy = telling the market "I consider anything below 84,000 to be cheap." You’re right, the stop-loss orders below 84,000 were already swept this week, and it just picked up those bloodied chips. *3. Buying doesn’t mean stability; this sentence is the essence* The 950 coins went into cold wallets, not held on exchanges to support the price. So whether $BTC can hold above 80,000 now doesn’t depend on how much it bought, but on where the next 80 million will come from. Combining your two tags: #US crypto tax and BTC reserve bill advances → This is the compliance reason for such companies to buy #Global high interest rate expectations heat up again → This is the reason suppressing the price from flying directly $BTC stands for scarcity—supply is determined by protocol rules, not human will. $ETH stands for programmable capital—making assets the infrastructure for on-chain finance, DeFi, and various applications. $SOL stands for performance and scale—faster execution, lower transaction costs, and the ability to handle high-frequency on-chain demand. Instead of arguing which chain is "best," observe which kind of value capital is paying a premium: scarcity? Programmability? Or performance? What the market really needs to watch is not just price increases, but what capital is repricing.$BTC $ETH — Whales and short squeezes are the real driving forces behind this rally. Bitcoin reclaimed $80,000 and recovered key moving averages — hundreds of millions of dollars worth of short positions were forcibly liquidated due to the prior squeeze. ETH fell from the high of $2,668, with momentum weaker than BTC. The next resistance is between $83,000 and $86,000 — more liquidations are pending. If broken, it could rise above $85,000; if rejected, it may fall to the $76,000 support level. The trend is still undecided — rallies driven by squeezes often fade quickly. #CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed #TrumpGulfIranTalks 🚨 $ETH breaks through $2700, with a 24H increase exceeding 4% at one point! This surge currently lacks a particularly obvious single positive catalyst; it seems more like a combined effect of technical breakout + short covering + capital inflow. 📊 Last week, ETH spot ETF saw a net outflow of about $140 million, but then a single day recorded a net inflow of about $144 million, indicating fluctuations in capital flow. 🔒 Staking demand remains strong, and ETH supply continues to shrink. Key levels to watch now: Support: 2600–2650 Resistance: 2750–2800 Whether $2700 can hold is crucial. If the rise is driven only by short squeeze, the risk of a pullback after the spike remains high. Don’t blindly chase the rally just because of the price increase. ⚠️ #ETH #Ethereum #CryptoThe US semiconductor market has once again witnessed a historic moment: on September 21, AMD's stock surged nearly 10% intraday, breaking through $613, with a total market value officially surpassing the $1 trillion mark, achieving a cumulative increase of 186% this year. Thanks to the MI400 series GPUs and the Helios rack system, AMD has aggressively secured major computing power contracts from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta, leading to a complete explosion in its data center business. The wild surge of the US computing power giants has cast a revealing light on the AI concept tokens in the crypto space that shout buy signals every day. Many retail investors fantasize that decentralized computing power and DePIN can overturn traditional centralized computing power, but faced with advanced process chips worth trillions of dollars, over 90% of AI projects in crypto don't even have a few legitimate advanced process GPUs. Essentially, they are speculating on intangible shadow expectations riding on the coattails of US stock giants. AMD breaking the trillion-dollar mark proves one thing: top global capital only recognizes hard currency with technological moats and real enterprise-level applications. If crypto AI tokens cannot truly integrate on-chain computing power into commercial closed loops, once the US tech stock bubble takes a breather, purely speculative tokens lacking self-sustaining capabilities will suffer cliff-like hemorrhaging. Speculating on concepts can be a wild game, but never mistake it for value investing. Focus on leading infrastructure that can truly execute GPU settlement and computing power delivery, and stay away from PPT air coins. Do you think the crypto AI concept can truly capture this wave of computing power dividends, or has it been merely riding the overflow bubble of US stocks from start to finish?
Orbit Topic Sitemap