Orbit Post Sitemap
The same 75860, different handling, vastly different results.
Retail trader Xiao C: Seeing a bearish bias, panics, cuts losses at 76000 and exits, but the price then grinds back to 75860, Xiao C gets hit on both sides.
Experienced trader Lao D: Does not act at 75860, waits for the position. Stabilizes at 74896 to try long, tests short above 77699, breaks with the trend. If the position is not reached, stays empty-handed and waits.
What's the difference? Xiao C is driven by emotions, Lao D is guided by a plan.
My approach: Learn from Lao D. Today's positions: test short above 77699, stabilize at 74896 to try long, stay empty in between. Each trade 5000U, always with stop loss, no holding losing positions.
Plan in hand, emotions aside. $BTC #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 The $CORE token itself is not listed on the London Stock Exchange. What is listed is the BTC staking ETP product (1VBS) issued by a third party, Valour (under DeFi Technologies), with the underlying staking technology supported by Core. Many community promotions simplify this as "Core listed on the LSE," which is a promotional statement and not a listing of the CORE coin for trading. Product: 1Valour Bitcoin Physical Staking (1VBS) 1. What it is: An ETP (Exchange Traded Product, similar to an ETF), publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, regulated by the UK FCA, with physical Bitcoin as the underlying asset. Bitcoin enters the Core network for non-custodial staking to generate yields. 2. Business logic - Valour holds real BTC, stored in institutional cold storage; - BTC is delegated to Core network validators for staking, generating staking rewards (nominal annualized about 1.4%); - Staking rewards are included in the product's net asset value, so investors buying this LSE security indirectly receive "BTC price appreciation + staking rewards"; - Open to professional investors in September 2025; open to UK retail investors in January 2026 after obtaining FCA approval. 3. Core's role here: underlying technology service provider - Provides the Satoshi-Plus staking protocol, enabling this BTC to be staked on the Core network; -I am the mid-term intelligence guy
Just released a major macro intelligence! The House Financial Services Committee passed H.R.8957, the "American Reserve Modernization Act," with a vote of 28:21, aiming to include strategic Bitcoin reserves into federal law.
Key points: The federal government's Bitcoin holdings must be locked for at least 20 years, during which selling, exchanging, or auctioning is strictly prohibited! The Treasury Department will establish the reserve within 180 days, audit private keys and holdings annually, study budget-neutral increases in holdings, but will not buy directly.
This news, combined with today's Bitcoin rally to 81,000 and the collective rebound of mainstream coins, solidifies the long-term logic! Large holders are tightly holding long positions, fundamentally driven by expectations of this kind of national-level lock-up. However, the bill still needs to pass both chambers and be signed by Trump, so don't get too excited in the short term. Keep an eye on the 81,000 support level, be bullish mid-term, and manage positions for swings.
$BTC
$ETH
#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 $BTC, $ETH, $CORE
Four tickers do not automatically mean four different bets.
$BTC, $ETH, and $CORE can still carry the same risk when the broader crypto market turns defensive.
$CORE is Bitcoin-aligned by design. $ETH usually follows $BTC.
Alignment is not independence.
If liquidity leaves crypto, correlation can make all three move together.
Real diversification means managing exposure, not adding names that live in the same gravity well.The United States is simultaneously advancing digital asset tax rules and Bitcoin reserve-related arrangements. Viewed together, these two matters carry far greater significance than just a headline of "positive news for BTC."
Tax rules address whether ordinary businesses dare to use it, whether accountants can handle it, and whether investors understand the costs; the national reserve addresses whether the government can hold it long-term, who is responsible for custody, and whether the assets are allowed to be lent or re-mortgaged. The former reduces usage friction, the latter changes the asset's identity.
The U.S. House Appropriations Committee has scheduled a review of the "Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act," but entering the legislative process does not guarantee final approval. The reserve plan also emphasizes "budget neutrality," and there remains significant flexibility regarding how to buy, how much to buy, and when to execute.
What I look forward to is not the government suddenly buying up assets, but rules that allow more balance sheets to legally and transparently accommodate BTC. Slow, but more solid than a slogan.
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 Compared to the previous round of data, the capital structure of the Bitcoin market has shown a significant reversal:
- Spot market recovery: 24h cumulative changed from -636.1M to +128.1M, indicating that spot buying has started to enter and absorb, and real demand has somewhat recovered, which is a positive signal.
- Contract market deterioration: 4h net outflow reached -653.0M, and 24h cumulative is -343.1M, indicating that leveraged funds are rapidly withdrawing, long positions lack confidence, and shorts are actively reducing positions to hedge.
Currently, BTC price is fluctuating around 80,000 USD. Although spot buying has warmed up, the strength is limited, while the large outflow of contract funds reflects a decline in overall market risk appetite, with leveraged funds choosing to wait or exit. $ETH is becoming an important signal.
If BTC moves sideways while ETH continues higher with increasing volume, that could point to capital rotating beyond Bitcoin.
Watching the flow, not chasing the candle.Today marks the first trading day since Buffett officially stepped down as Berkshire chairman. An era has ended, but BTC's answer sheet is just beginning. First, Buffett and Munger are Bitcoin's most famous opponents—"rat poison squared" and "foolish speculation." But Berkshire itself holds Coinbase stock indirectly through its insurance subsidiary, and after Buffett takes over, the "anti-crypto" label at the company's top governance level may gradually weaken. A deeper signal is: as the flagship figures of "value investing" step down, market narrative dominance is shifting from "traditional asset guardians" to active promoters of BTC like BlackRock, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley. Jay Jacobs, head of BlackRock ETFs, said a key line on a podcast last week: "ETFs have made Bitcoin 'avoidable' something to 'must discuss.'" Second, this morning's macro environment is more favorable to BTC. Oil prices broke through 100 (Brent 97.3, WTI 93.5), gold tested the 4,400 mark near 4,385, and silver broke above 67. South Korea's KOSPI opened 1.14% higher, with risk appetite in Asia rebounding. BTC traded narrowly in the 81,300-$81,500 range, awaiting the direction of the U.S. stock market opening tonight. Fear and Greed Index 70 (greed range), with bulls and bears outperforming 1.24 bulls—sentiment is optimistic but not yet frenzy. Third, four "test stations" have been set up for BTC this week. Today (Monday)Three major events are happening today simultaneously, each of which could change BTC's trajectory in the coming week. First, the Nasdaq 100 index quarterly rebalancing took effect before the U.S. stock market opened this morning. SpaceX's weight surged from 1.28% to 2.82%, meaning passive funds tracking this benchmark (including the $482 billion QQQ ETF) must make large-scale portfolio adjustments. Meanwhile, the S&P 100 added Palo Alto, Arista, SanDisk, and Dell, and the S&P 500 added Everpure, Bloom Energy, and Illumina. The mechanical buying and selling by passive funds will cause abnormal volatility today and tomorrow—if tech stocks see volume-driven gains due to rebalancing, BTC, as a "digital asset sentiment resonance product," may receive indirect support. Second, the 81st United Nations General Assembly general debate opens tomorrow (September 22) in New York, with 118 heads of state or government attending. Iranian President Raisi is expected to speak on the 23rd—this will be his first public statement on U.S. soil, and his wording and posture will directly influence market judgments on the direction of U.S.-Iran negotiations. On the same day, China-U.S. economic and trade consultations have already started in New York, led by He Lifeng. If news emerges during the General Assembly that "progress has been made on a ceasefire framework," oil prices may fall further, opening BTC's upside potential. Third, the four major AI giants Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Gu今早最大的变量不是美联储，是油价。 第一，布伦特原油今早跌穿 100，最低触及97.28，WTI 跌到 $93.5 附近——这是 9 月以来第一次跌破百元大关。触发点很明确：卡塔尔外交部发言人安萨里 20 日公开确认"多名美国官员表示希望达成协议并结束冲突"，伊朗方面也首次承认"调解方已告知美国准备好了谈判，且态度认真"。虽然伊朗同时开出了 7 项谈判条件（结束战事、解冻资产、解除封锁等），但市场读懂的信号是：双方都在找台阶下。 第二，油价破百对 BTC 的传导链是今年最可靠的相关性之一。过去两个月，BTC 和油价的负相关系数高达 -0.89。9 月 9 日布油冲 113 时 BTC 在76,000 挣扎；9 月 18 日布油跌破 100 当晚 BTC 暴涨 6% 到81,388；今天布油再次破百，BTC 稳稳站在 $81,300 上方。逻辑链很清楚：油价跌 → 通胀预期降温 → 美联储进一步加息的紧迫性下降 → 美元走弱 → 风险资产受益。 第三，但"停战行情"的持续性取决于三个硬约束。一是伊朗的 7 项条件几乎不可能被美方全盘接受（解冻资产 + 结束封锁 + 美军撤出 = 美国实质📊 A rising BTC/ETH → indicates that BTC is performing more strongly than ETH. 📉 A decline in BTC/ETH → indicates that ETH is catching up with BTC. 🔥 Interestingly, even if BTC and ETH rise simultaneously, the gap between their strengths will continue to change. Priced in US dollars, BTC/ETH helps us observe which side the capital is leaning into. Currently, BTC has regained the $81K level, with the latest trading data showing ETH around $2.68K; Meanwhile, on September 18, the US spot ETF rebounded, with BTC ETFs seeing net inflows of about $433M and ETH ETFs about $143.8M. 👀 So next, besides monitoring the USD prices of BTC and ETH, you can also observe the BTC/ETH ratio + ETF capital flow + trading volume to determine whether the market's relative strength is shifting #ZEC38KShortClosed #CryptoCapReclaims2_8T #BTC #ETH #CryptoJapan Coin CPU launches HOOD and opens ETH trading pair, the market only pulled back half a point
Japan Coin CPU launches HOOD and opens CPU/ETH trading pair—over an hour $ETH only moved half a point: from 2659.64 to 2672.7. My judgment: short-term bias is bullish but do not chase the high; only chase if volume breaks above 2707.7.
The event transmission is weak—the new pair just uses ETH as the pricing benchmark. Half an hour after the event, it only moved 0.01%, with volume shrinking to 0.908 times the 30-day average volume.
The real play is the price structure facing capital collision—ETF had a net outflow of 140 million USD last week, ending four weeks of net inflows; yet the market has recorded four consecutive bullish candles reaching 2672.7, RSI at 66.1 indicating strength, ADX at 47.3 showing a strong trend, and the current price is already above the upper Bollinger Band. BTC also broke above 81730, adding to the bullish atmosphere.
Resistance above: 2707.7 (today's high)
Support below: 2643.71 (today's low) → 2602.94 (September 19 low)
Watershed: a low-volume push to 2707.7 followed by a pullback is a false breakout; breaking below 2602.94 means reducing positions and exiting.
Action in one sentence—place a buy order at 2643.71, exit if it breaks 2602.94, hold if volume breaks above 2707.7. To avoid missing the next key move, keep an eye on it first.
$ETH $BTC$TAO TAO I am heavily invested at a high position and stuck, going through a very painful time. Previously, the AI narrative was booming, and I chased the high and rushed in, but then the funds gradually withdrew. Recently, the trading volume remains large, turnover is active, but the buying power is weak, and every rally is accompanied by selling. The market has been volatile these days, and its rebound is weak, suppressed by a huge locked-in position above. In the short term, it is very difficult to return to the cost price. Now I dare not add more positions, only using a very small position for short-term trades to slowly reduce the holding cost. AI sector tokens rely entirely on the narrative; once funds shift to new hotspots, old targets will be under long-term pressure. This trade taught me a lesson: after the hype is over, never heavily invest at a high position. No matter how good the story is, once the funds withdraw, the market is hard to recover.Sisters, privacy coins are really rampant; any one of them can surge dramatically.
I already got wrecked by ZEC before, now this $MINA, you still want to pump me? No way.
I don’t believe you can be as strong as ZEC.
This time I shorted.
Look at this. MINA surged from 0.037 all the way to 0.136, almost quadrupling like ZEC, now hovering high at 0.129.
This kind of rally is completely riding on ZEC’s sentiment; in reality, it has no value.
Once the tide goes out, it will fall faster than anyone else.
And do you know what happened to MINA a few days ago?
On September 3rd, Mina mainnet did a Mesa hard fork upgrade, and what happened?
The entire on-chain transactions were halted for 8 hours, multiple exchanges urgently suspended MINA deposits and withdrawals.
zkApps had to be manually updated by developers to recover because the verification keys were incompatible.
More critically, two core protocols in the Mina ecosystem, Zeko and Lumina, both announced they stopped operating due to this hard fork.
The Zeko team directly migrated to Ethereum, and Lumina chose to exit because of too few users.
A public chain that upgrades and ends up wiping out its own core ecosystem projects—have you ever seen such an operation?
Simply put, MINA is now barely holding on by "riding the spillover of ZEC’s privacy coin narrative."
ZEC has ETF launch and real privacy payment demand, what does MINA have?
It’s a ZK public chain, completely different from ZEC’s native privacy coin.
The market is heating up the entire privacy sector, MINA is just sipping the soup, but what happens when the soup is gone?
Without real use cases to support it, it will fall faster than anyone else.
From the chart, MINA can’t break above 0.13160, SAR is at 0.08078, price is too far from the moving average.
MACD is above zero line, but the gap between DIF and DEA is narrowing, the upward momentum is clearly fading.
I already shorted in at 0.12954, stop loss set above 0.145.
Target first looks at 0.10, if it breaks down, it will go to 0.07.
For privacy coins without real value support, the higher they rise, the harder I short.
$ZEC
$BTC
#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 $ETH is becoming an important signal.
If BTC moves sideways while ETH continues higher with increasing volume, that could point to capital rotating beyond Bitcoin.
Watching the flow, not chasing the candle.This $FIL FIL position is deeply trapped and currently quite painful. Initially optimistic about the storage sector, I heavily invested, but it has been steadily declining. Recently, the drop came with high volume, the rebound with low volume; the trading volume looks significant, but funds keep fleeing. The market has slightly warmed up these days, but its rebound strength is weak, with multiple layers of trapped positions above. The short-term trend is weak, and quick recovery is basically unrealistic. Now I no longer blindly add positions to lower the cost; I've suffered the pain of losing more by averaging down. I can only slightly reduce positions on rebounds to shrink my holdings. This project has had persistent early-stage chip release pressure, with institutions continuously unlocking and selling. In crypto, just holding won't guarantee recovery; stubbornly holding a wrong position only deepens the loss. This trade taught me not to heavily invest long-term based solely on sector stories.This $ETC ETC position is a small one with a slight loss, but my mindset remains relatively calm. I previously predicted that old coins would rotate and positioned myself in advance, but unfortunately, the entry timing was a bit early. Recently, trading volume has been moderate, with price movements following the overall market, showing no independent trend. The market has been oscillating back and forth these days, with a short-term trend leaning towards repeated tug-of-war, lacking a clear one-sided direction. My strategy is not to rush to cut losses nor to heavily add to the position. I will wait for a rebound to the resistance level before considering adjusting my holdings. ETC is a well-established coin with a large market cap, making it difficult to see those several-fold violent surges. When dealing with such old coins, one cannot expect to get rich quickly; instead, one can only capture phase-based rotation opportunities. After years of trading, I understand that when the market is unstable, mainstream old coins mostly just follow the fluctuations and rarely break out independently with big moves. Patience is needed to wait for rotation windows.90% probability of releasing the new model before September 27.
At first glance, I thought I was mistaken; this is a Polymarket bet on the Claude Opus release date.
It rose 13 points in 24 hours, indicating that people are putting real money into it.
But from a market maker's perspective, the focus isn't on the probability, but on the settlement rules.
The rules are very strict: it must be publicly usable, closed testing doesn't count, waitlist counts.
In other words, this bet isn't on "whether it will be released," but on "whether ordinary people can access it."
These are quite different matters.
It's very common for models to be given to enterprise clients first, then gradually opened up.
A 90% probability doesn't mean you'll definitely see it on the 27th.
It only means those betting think "it's coming soon."
As for how much of this "soon" is based on information and how much is sentiment, no one knows.
Do you think this 90% is based on solid info, or is it just another round of scaring ourselves?
#OKX预言家：来星球玩预测
#AnthropicIPO推迟，估值预期逼2万亿 #AI降速争议未退，算力投入继续加码 $ETH Institutional sentiment is beginning to pave the way for risk assets. Microsoft's AI head stated that regulation will not slow down security progress, essentially providing a safety net for tech-related risk appetite. Bitcoin is currently priced around 81566, with the order book structure clear, moving averages aligned bullishly, and MACD showing a golden cross with no contraction in histogram bars. AI buying pressure continues to support. 81.5K is not a hard ceiling, just a liquidity gate waiting to be broken. The liquidation map shows a large accumulation of short stop-losses above 82K, and a long liquidation zone below 80.5K. This position is unlikely to linger; an upward impulse is expected to sweep out the shorts above.
Just completed a trade climbing seven floors, still catching my breath. I won’t chase highs in this structure, but I also won’t short. A pullback to 80900–81200 is a good zone to follow the trend and add longs, with stop-loss defense below 80400. A break below that indicates the failure of the short sweep above. First take-profit target is 82400, second at 83000. If the 15-minute candle volume supports a steady hold above 81850, a light position can be added, with stop-loss at 81300 and target above 82800.
Remember, if 81.5K fails to close above for three consecutive 15-minute candles, exit longs first. Don’t fight the liquidation zones; wait for a wave buildup before acting.
$BTC
#ETH冲高2700美元，质押与资金面现分化
@OKX星球 📈📈Do not stack $BTC, $ETH, $CORE, $ZEC and call it four trades.
🔥🔥 That is one risk-on ticket with extra tickets.
If the dollar squeezes crypto, all four mark the same way. Cut the count or cut the size.
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed Let me tell you my own story: Once, BTC was also grinding close to support just like now.
I couldn't resist the urge and opened a long position at 76000, thinking "The support is so close, what’s there to fear?" But the support broke, I didn’t stop loss, held on all the way down to 74000, and finally cut my losses. That loss was almost equivalent to my entire year's income.
Later I understood: support is not a talisman; once broken, it’s just paper. Discipline is the real talisman.
Now BTC is at 81509, support at 80100, resistance at 82088, leaning bearish. My plan: only try longs if it stabilizes above 74896, exit if it breaks, never hold through. Each trade 5000U, stop loss always set.
Recovering from a 200,000U loss, I will never repeat the same mistake. $BTC #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 Trump has called all six Gulf countries to New York for a meeting. On the surface, it's to discuss the next phase of the Iran war, but the real purpose is just one: to find someone to foot the bill and to find a way out for himself.
He talks about facing a "major decision," neither ruling out a full-scale conflict nor ruling out talks. This tactic is very familiar—extreme pressure before negotiations. By involving Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and other Gulf allies, he aims both to get them to contribute money and effort and to appease allies. Iran's ceasefire conditions through Qatar—ending the conflict, unfreezing funds, lifting the maritime blockade—actually provide a basis for negotiation. Trump has no intention of opening a new front now; he's purely fishing for political chips for himself.
The market reaction is very honest. Oil prices dropped nearly three points directly, while Bitcoin slightly rose. The market simply doesn't believe Trump will really fight; geopolitical risk premiums are rapidly fading. As long as there is no war, oil prices won't rise, inflation expectations will cool down, and the Fed won't dare to cut interest rates recklessly. This is a hidden medium- to long-term positive for our crypto circle.
But we still need to be cautious. If the talks on the 22nd collapse and Trump really orders action, oil prices will soar, inflation will explode, and Bitcoin will definitely dive along with other risk assets. So the current strategy is simple: hold your spot positions firmly, don't bet on direction in the short term, and set good stop losses. Trump flips faster than a book, so it's not too late to act once the shoe drops. $BTC $CL $BZ #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 A mining machine consumes 880,000 kWh of electricity to produce one coin, costing 520,000, so the value of Bitcoin is anchored to the electricity cost. This is a typical conceptual fallacy. Cost supporting value only applies to physical goods, like steel or rice; you spend a certain cost to produce them, so they are worth at least that much because physical goods have use value. Bitcoin is not like that; its price depends on how many people are willing to buy it with real money, not on how much electricity miners spend. If cost equaled value, then all the Bitcoin produced by bankrupt mining companies should be worth 520,000, but in reality, during bear markets, it can drop to 20,000 USD and still sell. What's worse, he calls mining machines and electricity "unforgeable energy," which sounds sophisticated but is actually treating mining costs as a moat. The problem is that mining machine prices will drop, electricity prices will fall, and computing power efficiency will improve. Now it takes 880,000 kWh to produce one coin; the next generation of mining machines might only need 300,000 kWh, so costs decrease every year. This "anchor" itself is moving, and using a number that changes daily as a pricing basis is a joke. Musk did say something similar, but when did he say he bought coins based on this logic? He bought because he believed the crypto narrative could push prices up, not because he actually calculated electricity costs. What really makes Bitcoin valuable is its hard cap of 21 million coins, its decentralized censorship resistance, and global capital's fear of fiat currency devaluation—not miners' electricity meters. This kind of talk is best suited for lectures where the audience is traditional bosses who firmly believe "cost equals value," and after the talk, they sell courses and equipment. We retail investors can just enjoy the show.🔥🔥 On the surface, these are four different assets, but in reality, they may all belong to the same high-risk asset exposure. Currently, BTC has regained near $81K, ETH is around $2.66K, ZEC has returned above $1,500, and the total market capitalization has rebounded to about $2.87T. But macro risks have not disappeared. US Treasury yields have recently risen, and the market is still watching signals of future Fed rate hikes; The US dollar index is currently around 100.2, and a strong dollar environment may continue to put pressure on the crypto market. So what really needs to be watched is not "I hold several coins," but whether 👉 these positions will fall simultaneously when the market falls. If the dollar continues to strengthen and liquidity tightens, BTC, ETH, CORE, and ZEC may show a high correlation. ⚠️ Reduce the number of positions, or decrease the size of each position. Four trades that look different may only be four times the exposure of the same risk direction #BTC #ETH #CORE #ZEC #Crypto #RiskManagementTook a look at BTC this morning, 75860, bearish bias, feeling uneasy.
Not afraid of a drop, just afraid of this kind of grinding. It neither rises nor falls decisively, going long risks being suppressed, going short risks a rebound, so better not to act. But staying still makes me itchy, always feeling like I'm missing something.
I used to be like this, restless and making random moves, losing 200,000 U. Now I know: when the market is boring, being out of position isn't missing out, it's protection.
Plan: try short above 77699, try long if 74896 holds steady. If the price doesn't reach these levels, I'll just watch, with a cup of tea and one screen, waiting for the opportunity.
Each trade 5000 U, always with stop loss, no holding losing positions. No rush to make money right now. $BTC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 In mid-August, Bitcoin surged 24.6% in five days, the strongest weekly gain during the past two years' correction period.
Logically, such a breakout should see leverage expanding wildly and bulls rushing in, right?
Completely the opposite.
During the same period, the open interest in BTC-denominated contracts dropped by 12.6%.
Price rose 24.6%, but leverage was retreating.
What does this mean?
The driving force behind this rally was not anyone's "buying." It was shorts being forcibly liquidated.
Shorts contributed 89% of the liquidation liquidity.
Data from the joint report by Glassnode and Bybit: about 64,000 BTC worth of open contracts were wiped out in this rally. Of that, 89% of the liquidation funds came from short positions.
When short accounts hit their liquidation thresholds, the liquidation engine forcibly issues market buy orders. These buy orders push prices higher, triggering more short liquidations.
The shorts' own stop-loss orders became the core liquidity fuel driving the price up.
BTC's total open interest across the network decreased by 6.21% in 24 hours, currently totaling about $45.4 billion. Leverage is ebbing while price is rising.
This is a zero-sum game.
Breaking down the four roles in this game:
Shorts: Forced to liquidate, contributing 89% of liquidation liquidity. They didn’t "get the direction wrong"—they were cornered by leverage.
Bulls: No large-scale position additions. Open interest is declining. The rise isn’t because someone is buying, but because someone has to buy.
Market makers: Near-term option volatility jumped 80%, but 3-month and 6-month distant options remained unchanged. Market makers strictly price this rally as a "short-term liquidity liquidation event." You chase the rally; they profit from the spread.
Retail traders: Chasing highs and selling lows, becoming the ultimate liquidity providers.
Your counterparty is the liquidation engine. It has no emotions, no hesitation, and needs no good news.
Is the market really short on money?
BTC spot ETFs recorded about $6.2 million net inflow last week, while BlackRock’s IBIT saw about $120.6 million net inflow in the same period. On the surface, institutions seem to be accumulating. But note one detail: ETF net outflows were nearly $750 million in the first two days of the week, barely offset by a single-day $433 million inflow on Friday. At the end of August, spot Bitcoin ETFs had weekly net inflows as high as $1.92 billion. The current incremental inflow is almost negligible compared to the strongest phase.
The total stablecoin market cap is now $307.6 billion, up 1.85% in the past week. It’s recovering, but very slowly.
No new money. No large, sustained ETF inflows. So why can the price still rise?
Because the market’s own clearing mechanism is creating the buying pressure. When leverage distribution is extremely unbalanced, the market can surge without good news. Conversely, it can crash without bad news.
Three suggestions for you:
Reduce leverage. In this structure, leverage is the biggest enemy. When shorts are liquidated, the liquidation engine is your counterparty. You can’t withstand it.
Extend your holding period. Market makers profit from spreads in the near term, while distant terms remain stable. You want to play the distant direction, not be the fuel for near-term liquidation.
Wait for incremental capital signals. Continuous ETF net inflows and stablecoin market cap growth are the real "new money entering" signals. Before that, all rebounds may be short-term shocks driven by liquidations, not trend reversals.
In a zero-sum market, you don’t earn money from "rises" but from others being forced to liquidate.
Are you sure you can always be on the right side?
$BTC $ETH $ZEC Over the past year, options traders have been systematically doing the same thing: not believing in a rise.
The premium on put options is higher than on call options, which in plain language means—the entire market is willing to pay more for "downside protection." More people are buying insurance than lottery tickets, and this has lasted for a year.
This is not just someone's opinion; it's what option pricing is telling us.
Then came the short squeeze in August.
Bitcoin rose 24.6% in five days, marking the largest single-week gain during a pullback period in the past two years. But Glassnode's report revealed a counterintuitive fact: during this rally, the open interest measured in Bitcoin not only did not increase but actually dropped by 12.6%.
Who was buying? The answer: shorts forced to liquidate.
About 64,000 BTC worth of open contracts across the network were wiped out, with as much as 89% of the liquidation funds coming from short positions. The shorts' own stop-loss orders became the core fuel driving the price higher.
Along with this reversal, the market's implied volatility index (DVOL) recorded an 8-point swing in a single day—equivalent to four times the normal daily average volatility range. The implied volatility of call options regained dominance, forcibly reversing 361 days of put skew in just one trading day.
361 days of belief, shattered in one day.
The reversal of the put skew is not a one-time event. This week, it was reinforced again.
The Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, the first since 2023, and released dovish forecasts—projecting a median policy rate of only 4.1% by the end of 2027, implying only one more rate action.
Bitcoin responded by breaking through the $80,000 mark.
Coinglass data showed $183 million in short liquidations within 60 minutes, with about $192 million in leveraged positions liquidated, over $183 million of which came from shorts. Bitcoin accounted for about $119 million of this, and Ethereum shorts accounted for another $36 million—about 95 cents of every dollar liquidated came from traders betting on price declines.
Bitcoin continued to climb afterward. In the past 24 hours, short liquidations exceeded $230 million, with the price briefly touching $82,000.
Glassnode issued a new warning: Bitcoin is climbing into a thickening liquidation zone, with a dense cluster near $83,000 to $86,000. These short positions have been accumulating for weeks, and if this area is reached, forced short liquidations could push the price rapidly through this range.
CoinGlass's seven-day liquidation heatmap shows cumulative short liquidation pressure of about $4.79 billion in the $75,982 to $83,575 range, while long liquidation below is only about $2.05 billion—short pressure above is 2.5 times that below.
The reversal of the put skew is not a one-time event. It is being repeatedly reinforced.
But there is one signal worth savoring more carefully.
Coinbase Markets data shows Bitcoin options open interest nominal value at about $1.73 billion, with the max pain point at $77,500, and the put/call open interest ratio rising from 0.61 to 0.78—position distribution is becoming more balanced but still dominated by calls.
Laevitas data is even more intriguing: Bitcoin's 7-day 25-delta skew shifted from +2.16 to -1.05, and the 30-day skew from +1.33 to -1.39—put option prices are again slightly higher than call options.
To translate: after the put skew was broken for the first time in 361 days, short-term hedging demand is heating up again.
This is not a contradiction. It is the market repricing risk. When shorts accumulate between $83,000 and $86,000, and option skew turns defensive again—the market is preparing for "direction choice" with both hands.
When the market is forced to price "upside risk" rather than "downside risk," the nature of the trend may be changing.
Breaking 361 days of put inertia is itself one of the strongest signals. But the short-term skew turning defensive again, and shorts densely accumulating between $83,000 and $86,000—this means every upcoming breakout could be a rocket ignited by the shorts themselves.
Reduced supply does not necessarily mean prices must rise. Demand is always king. But in a structure where shorts pile up like mountains, a single upward breakout is enough to turn everyone's short positions into fuel.
$ETH $BTC $ZEC $ONE I opened a long position at 0.0022334 with 10x leverage, the mark price rose to 0.0041603, floating profit +862.76% — small principal, light position, although the numbers look good, essentially this is a risk-controlled trial position. Stop loss is set below the entry price, take profit is partially closed in batches, not chasing full profit. Technically, the moving averages just formed a golden cross, volume supports the reason for taking this trade; but small-cap coins fluctuate fiercely, contracts are more suitable for light positions and swing trading, don’t be greedy with leverage. The coin price sentiment is still developing, whether it can continue the trend depends on whether the pullback can hold support and if the golden cross is confirmed by volume. Position size determines life or death, profit is just the result. $ZEC $AKE #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 ⚠️ Bulls continue to dominate, with ETH leading the breakout and oil prices showing a significant reversal.
ETH is currently around 2677, having broken through the previous key level of 2672. ETF funds are recovering, exchange balances are decreasing, and the staking ratio has exceeded 35%. However, futures open interest has risen to about $34.3 billion, so chasing above 2700 is not advisable. BTC remains above 80K, with 83K–86K being the main supply and short liquidation zone; in the last two ETF trading days, BTC has seen a cumulative net inflow of about $593 million.
The biggest macro positive today is oil prices: Brent has dropped to around $101.7, WTI has fallen below 100 to about $98.2, easing inflation and Fed pressure marginally. Asian AI/semiconductor sectors continue to strengthen, and the latest China-US trade and AI talks are also leaning positive.
The strategy remains bullish: after ETH breaks 2700 and holds above 2670 on a pullback, targets are 2750/3000; BTC holding above 83K targets 85K–86K, or on a pullback to 79K–80K without breaking lower, remain long. Only if BTC falls below 78K + large ETF outflows resume + macro conditions worsen, will short positions be reconsidered.ETH just touched 2700, the next move might not be on ETH anymore
The highest hit was 2707.98; it quickly fell back right after stepping on 2700
But I actually think the price can be given some room
1. The ETF side hasn't fully caught up yet
On September 18, the spot ETH ETF saw a net inflow of about $144 million, but before that, there were three consecutive trading days of outflows, so the funds aren't flowing in continuously
2. On-chain ETH is getting "heavier"
About 43.32 million ETH are now staked, accounting for about 35% of the total supply. Institutions are also staking large amounts of ETH, so the truly freely circulating tokens in the market are becoming more noteworthy.
3. What’s really worth watching this time is what Ethereum plans to do next
Privacy is starting to move to the protocol layer, zkEVM is progressing, account abstraction is advancing, and even post-quantum security has been included in the long-term roadmap.
Looking outward, ARB and OP are on the L2 scaling track, STRK and ZK are on the ZK path, and AZTEC is in the privacy direction.
The market used to like "ETH goes up, the ecosystem follows."
If Ethereum really layers privacy, ZK, and account abstraction one by one, what might truly get renewed attention are the infrastructures that have always been hiding behind ETH
I want to see if, after ETH pushes the price up, it will start expanding into the ecosystem
That’s the key to whether this rally has a second layer.
$ETH #ETH冲高2700美元，质押与资金面现分化 What I see is that everyone is opening long positions,
I am also optimistic about the market and am bullish,
so if there is no new capital inflow, whose money is being made?
Therefore, there will be a shakeout during this period, by pumping altcoins,
leading those who are not firm in $BTC and $ETH to exit,
Bitcoin and Ethereum will fluctuate within a narrow range, just not rising much,
small retail investors see they can't make money and are attracted by the gains in altcoins. Qatar says the US hopes to reach an agreement with Iran. According to Xinhua News Agency on September 20, Qatar's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majid Ansari stated on the 20th that Qatar is maintaining communication with the US and Iran to promote the resumption of US-Iran negotiations. Several US government officials have expressed that the US side hopes to reach an agreement and end regional conflicts.
Ansari added that Qatar continues to mediate and exchange views between the two countries, trying to bridge differences, but has not yet provided a timetable for restarting negotiations. The core goal of this round of mediation is to ensure the security of key waterways such as the Strait of Hormuz and stabilize the geopolitical situation in the Middle East.
This news directly impacts previous geopolitical risk-hedging expectations and will quickly transmit to the crypto market. If expectations for US-Iran negotiations continue to heat up, market risk aversion will cool down, and BTC's digital gold risk premium will decline; risk assets like ETH will see short-term pressure relieved and rebound potential opened. Meanwhile, the privacy narrative heat around ZEC will cool down temporarily, and funds will withdraw from the privacy risk-hedging track.
However, it is important to note that this is merely a mediation signal; the negotiation process is repetitive and volatile, and news reversals may occur at any time. Geopolitical news can easily trigger sharp market spikes, so do not heavily bet on one-sided moves. Patiently follow subsequent negotiation developments, strictly control leverage, and manage position risk.🔥 In fact, they all belong to the same set of risk-driven positions, just with different degrees of exposure. Currently, the total market capitalization of the crypto market has returned to around $2.87T, BTC has reached $81K, ETH is close to $2.68K, and ZEC recently briefly touched $1,590, clearly showing a rise in market risk appetite. But if the dollar strengthens and bond yields continue to rise, risk assets may also come under pressure. Therefore, rather than continuously increasing the number of coins, it is better to control overall positions: ➡️ reduce highly correlated holdings ➡️ or lower the proportion ➡️ of funds in each position, focusing on whether BTC holds above the $80K level. It looks like there are four trades now, and the real risk is likely the same macro risk #CryptoMarket #BTC #ETH #CORE #ZEC #CryptoCap2_87TGreed index 71, this number is not the price
The fear and greed index was 72 yesterday, 71 today.
It does not look at the coin price, only at volatility, trading volume, and social heat.
How this number is calculated:
It scores five or six indicators separately, then takes the average.
A score of 71 means most indicators are on the hot side, not just one exploding.
Common misreading:
71 is greed, but the 7-day average is only 63.
That means this heat has only piled up in the last few days.
The 30-day average is 66, which has always been in the greed range.
The index dropping by 1 point does not mean cooling down, it just means no further increase.
What really matters is where it came from, not how high it is now.
People who get excited seeing 71 mostly haven’t checked what it was last week.
#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元
#ETH冲高2700美元，质押与资金面现分化 #SOL延续涨势，资金与链上需求共振 $ETH $BTC reclaiming $80K is interesting.
But one green move doesn't automatically mean the entire market has reversed.
I want to see:
Higher highs
Higher lows
Stronger volume
Follow-through
Confirmation > FOMO.$VVV, the more it rises sharply, the more I want to short here. It has indeed risen beautifully these past few days. Around 22, it surged to 32 now. If you only look at the candlesticks,
the easiest thought now is: it can still go up. But looking at this position, my first reaction is: not chasing anymore.
It's not because I think VVV is no good, but after such continuous rallies,
I no longer know if I'm buying value or buying sentiment. So this time I choose the opposite. VVV, 20x short. Open near 32, putting the risk on myself first. If it keeps rallying, I admit it.
If it starts to fall back, what I want to bet on is not "VVV is going to crash," but:
how many people are still willing to catch the last leg above 32 in this rally.Good morning, how many people are like me, the first thing I do when I open my eyes is check BTC, 75860, bearish, and my heart skips a beat?
My first reaction is not "whether to trade," but "check the plan." My plan was written long ago: try short above 77699, try long if it stabilizes at 74896, follow the trend if it breaks. If the position isn't reached, don't move.
I used to want to trade as soon as I opened my eyes every day, but the more I traded, the more I lost, losing 200,000 U. Now I know: a trader's daily routine is not trading, it's waiting.
Today, we wait together. Each trade 5000 U, always with stop loss, no holding losing positions. Opportunities come from waiting, not chasing. $BTC #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 Bitcoin surged to $82,100 today, with 5 consecutive daily gains 🚀 ｜ Altcoins went even crazier, ETH broke 2700, NEAR nearly doubled in a week
ETF funds are warming up 📊
Bitcoin spot ETFs saw continuous outflows since April, but started net inflows close to $1 billion weekly from August, hitting $1.92 billion in the week of August 21, a new high since last October
Saylor hinted yesterday that Strategy is about to increase holdings again! Since the end of August, about 3,000 BTC have been repurchased, with total holdings at 845,050 BTC, valued at $68.76 billion
ETH spot ETFs have had positive inflows for 3 consecutive months, with $1.85 billion in August alone, a record high. Bitmine holds 5.85 million ETH, accounting for 4.83% of total supply
Macro headwinds seem to be easing ⚠️
After the Fed's rate hike was implemented, the market has slowly risen. Polymarket data shows a 55% chance of another rate hike in October; if it happens, the likelihood is high that rates will then remain steady
There are also new developments in the US-Iran situation:
Iran listed 7 negotiation conditions, Trump said he might be open to a meeting, indicating signs of easing tensions
What’s more noteworthy this time is the simultaneous improvement in ETF funds, on-chain data, and macro expectations—a rare resonance. Whether it can truly break through the stronger confirmation zone of $82,500-$83,000 is key to judging the quality of this rebound
$BTC $ETH $NEAR $ZEC surged to 1600 but failed to hold, falling back to 1470. It has quintupled in a month, and now at this high level it’s repeatedly shaken down, leaving short-term traders confused and disoriented.
This rally is driven by Grayscale’s ZCSH listing on the NYSE, community voting to accelerate, and a privacy pool locking up 30% of the coins — the narrative is indeed strong. But what’s really worth watching is that whale chart: Garrett Jin holds 320 million in spot, with a cost basis of only 437. His short positions covered just 19%, which he fully closed near 1500, losing 35 million, and he hasn’t sold a single spot coin. The biggest selling pressure now isn’t from shorts but from this person who can realize over 200 million in floating profits anytime; slowly reducing his position is enough to suppress the price.
The fuel for short covering is burned out; Grayscale ETF inflows mainly come from internal DCG transfers, with little real external capital. SAR is hanging at 1425, RSI has dropped to 63, futures basis has turned to premium, and risks are accumulating.
The long-term narrative remains unchanged, but there’s no incremental short-term support. Chasing longs isn’t worthwhile, and shorting can easily be pierced by a big bullish candle.
So here’s the question: at 1470, do you think it’s a pullback to pick up buyers, or is the market topping out? If you have a position, do you plan to hold or run? Share in the comments; I want to see how many are still on board.
#ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 $BTC $ETH 📈📈 Don't treat the positions of 4 coins as 4 independent trades.
$BTC, $ETH, $CORE, $ZEC may look like different assets, but if the funding environment suddenly shifts to risk-off, they could all come under pressure simultaneously.
🔥 What really matters is not "how many coins you hold," but how large your overall risk exposure is.
Currently, BTC is around $81.3K, ETH around $2.66K, and the market as a whole is still in a rebound phase; meanwhile, the US Dollar Index remains near 100. After the recent Fed rate hike, the market continues to focus on the future interest rate path.
So the approach is simple:
➡️ If you want to add assets, reduce the position size of each individual one
➡️ If you want to maintain your position size, don't blindly stack related risks
➡️ True diversification means different assets don't all drop simultaneously under stress
4 coins ≠ 4 risks.
Sometimes it's just 1 large position split into 4 names.
$BTC $ETH $CORE $ZEC
#Crypto #Bitcoin #Ethereum #RiskManagement 📈📈 Don’t stack $BTC , $ETH , $CORE , and $ZEC and count them as four separate trades.
🔥🔥 That’s still one risk-on position with multiple layers of exposure.
If the dollar puts pressure on crypto, all four can move in the same direction. Reduce the number of positions or reduce the size.
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed $XPL This is not a rebound; this feels like CPR for my empty account, right?
Just after lunch while watching the market, XPL was still bottoming out, and others were on the sidelines. I saw the pullback hold steady, buying pressure strengthen, and funds quietly entering, so I opened a long position around 0.08420. At that time, I only said: as long as support holds, going long has a chance.
Being out of position is not a sin; opening positions recklessly is the mistake.
Not long after, 0.09474 gave the answer, +628.26% right before my eyes. Those on board must have woken up laughing; this profit feels great.
Take profits on 70% of the long position first, protect the remaining 30% at cost, let profits run if it continues to rise, and don’t let gains turn uncomfortable if it pulls back.
Hold as long as the trend is intact; exit if it breaks. Don’t fall in love with stocks.
Now is not the time to rush; wait for a more comfortable position in the next round, and I will notify immediately. The market is not short of opportunities, but patience is what’s lacking.
$BNB $XRP $OFC Initially thought this rebound would prove wrong, but it ran out of steam first. During the intraday plunge, I noticed every rally was short of breath, heavy on the bull trap vibe, directly signaling a short position approach; if no one supports the rise, don't chase it hard.
OFC opened at 0.010214, now at 0.008703, +293.12% giving a direct answer, hitting the rhythm right really feels great.
Take profits on 80% first, keep the remaining 20% at cost price as protection; if it continues to drop, let the profits run, and if it rebounds, don't give back what you've already secured.
Don't get greedy with profits, don't despair over pullbacks. Panic comes from lack of plan, losses come from overthinking.
For friends who haven't entered yet, listen to me: chasing shorts easily gets punished by rebounds, wait for a new structure to form, then watch again, and act when the next signal appears.
$BTC $ETH Memory giants $SKHY and Samsung are in a good mood today.
I remain bullish on memory ($EWY /$DRAM) — if the capacity agreement is extended another 3–5 years, and your analysts' models already project 2.8–3.3x by 2027E... the longer the timeframe, the more attractive the risk-reward of this trade becomes.
But I think the truly interesting opportunity right now lies in traditional memory, with the logic being the upside potential of ASP...
Coincidentally, these big players themselves are also sourcing from smaller memory manufacturers — and those smaller companies have much greater elasticity to any changes.Many people reflexively shout overbought and short when they see RSI surge above 80, which is a typical indicator misinterpretation. The RSI of strong coins can remain dulled at high levels for a long time; relying on a single indicator often leads to repeated failures. What should really be done is a horizontal comparison of relative strength.
$SEI current price 0.05685, 24h up 18.88%, MA5=0.0556 has risen above MA20=0.0517245, MACD histogram +0.0005259 maintains bullishness, and the moving averages form a complete bullish structure. Compared to the actively traded $PROVE in the same period, which rose 11.27% slightly less, but PROVE's funding rate of -0.0413% indicates bears are still resisting; while $SEI's funding rate of +0.0100% is mildly positive, bulls pay but not extremely, indicating leverage sentiment is not overheated yet, which makes it "cleaner" than PROVE. Looking at $CELR, 24h down 32.72%, MA5<MA20, MACD turned bearish, funding rate -1.1325% is an extreme negative value, belonging to a weak panic-sold variety, completely different tier from $SEI. Concurrent focus: $CELR, $PROVE, the former has a clear bearish trend, the latter is bullish but funding rate leans bearish, both relatively weaker than $SEI.
Directionally, I am bullish, but RSI=80.8 combined with a fear and greed index of 70 (greed) means chasing highs is risky; waiting for a pullback is safer. The U.S. government is preparing to lock BTC for 20 years, and I think this news deserves serious attention.
On September 16, the U.S. House Financial Services Committee advanced the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Act with 28 votes in favor and 21 against. According to the version passed by the committee, eligible federal government BTC will be included in the strategic reserve. If the bill is ultimately enacted, in principle, it cannot be sold, exchanged, or auctioned within 20 years. Note, this has only passed the committee so far and has not yet become law.
There is also a detail that is easy for people calling trades to misinterpret: this bill does not authorize the U.S. government to directly buy BTC on the market in large quantities; new purchases are still under study. What is currently being discussed is keeping the government’s eligible BTC holdings in the reserve long-term.
For me, this news affects long-term expectations and should not be used to explain every 15-minute candlestick. Yesterday, BTC still dropped from 81,953 to 80,133; no matter how hot the policy news is, short-term leveraged positions that need to be cleared will still be cleared.
For trading, I will continue to watch 80,000: if it holds and recovers back to 80,400–80,800, then I will consider following the rebound; I won’t chase before 82,000 is firmly held. If 80,000 breaks, then look for support at 79,500 and 79,000.
If the U.S. government really locks some BTC into a 20-year reserve, the market’s expectation of these coins being sold off in the future will change. But advancing the bill does not mean prices will rise tomorrow, and even with a long-term bullish view, there is no need to chase aggressively at short-term resistance levels.【$ZEC】After surging to 1,548, the funding rate just turned positive from -0.045% — the shorts have been squeezed out, who will carry the next wave?
#ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元
ZEC today had a full move of surge and pullback: 1,428 → 1,548.76 → now 1,523. Three funding signals are more valuable than the price itself:
The funding rate just turned positive. On 9/16, the rate plunged to -0.045% — shorts paid interest for 4 days and got squeezed almost to tears. Now it’s back positive, indicating shorts have mostly covered, and the strongest short-term rally phase is over.
Retail long accounts are 66%. The crowd chasing highs is packed, this kind of structure is easiest to shake out.
Open interest fell from 196.5 million to 195 million. Big money is pulling back while pushing up, not without intention, just taking profits first.
But note: the price is still above the 5-minute moving average, strong consolidation is intact. My new long opened at 1,530, currently down 24%, liquidation at 1,468 — smarter this time than last, leaving a 4% safety buffer.
1,550 is the short-term ceiling, don’t chase it
A pullback to 1,500-1,510 without breaking is a second chance to enter
ZEC has surged nearly 50% from 1,084 to 1,548. Pump-and-dump coins never move in a straight line; a shakeout is needed to go further.Saylor is calling the shots again, will the retail investors rush in? Wake up! Strategy hasn't spent money for three weeks!
With Saylor's phrase "A little more orange," the market surged! But don't get ahead of yourself—the fact is, Strategy hasn't bought any coins for three consecutive weeks! Where did the money go? They spent $139.3 million buying back their own preferred shares! Holding 845,050 BTC at an average price of $75,412, what are they waiting for?
Looking at the market, a classic "pin bar" pattern with a rise and fall across the board:
$BTC peaked at 82,099, now at 81,537, with MA20 support at 81,046;
$ETH peaked at 2,707, now at 2,670, support at 2,629;
$SOL peaked at 113.41, now at 111.86, support at 110.10.
The 1-hour MACD shows a high-level death cross; chasing highs short-term is like catching a flying knife! The calls are a sentiment boost, but institutions are using real money to buy back their own stock. If the next filing still shows no coin purchases, this enthusiasm will cool off. Don't get blinded by the "calls," wait for a pullback to support before acting. This article does not constitute investment advice. #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 Brothers, $SNDK surged 11% back to 1780, officially included in the S&P 100 effective at today's open.
$SNDK $1,793
SanDisk closed Friday with a sharp rise of 10.99% to $1,791.82, hitting an intraday high of $1,797, with a trading volume of $30.7 billion ranking 6th on the US stock market volume list. After pulling back from the September 9 high of $1,807 to $1,520, it rebounded nearly 18% over four trading days, recovering all losses from the Kioxia "cold water splash" incident.
$SNDK surged 11%, inclusion in the S&P 100 effective at today's open
The core catalyst for this rebound is the official inclusion in the S&P 100 index today (September 21), along with Dell, Palo Alto Networks, and Arista Networks, replacing Colgate-Palmolive. Passive buying by index funds and ETFs will bring forced buying, boosting liquidity and institutional attention. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rallied late to close up 2.78%, Micron rose 3.92%, Seagate surged over 6%, and the storage sector collectively erupted.
But one detail is worth noting: SNDK director David Goeckeler submitted Form 144 on September 17, intending to sell 33,841 shares, valued at about $51.44 million. Over the past three months, he has cumulatively sold shares of the same scale, with executives continuously cashing out during the rebound.
#闪迪正式纳入标普100指数 The U.S. House Financial Services Committee advanced H.R. 8957, the "American Reserve Modernization Act," with a vote of 28 to 21. The core provision is simple: Bitcoin legally held by the federal government must be locked for at least 20 years from the effective date of the act, and cannot be sold, exchanged, auctioned, or used as collateral.
What does 20 years mean? There are only 21 million Bitcoins in total, and those confiscated by the U.S. government have always worried the market that they might be dumped at any time. Now, it's settled by law—locked for 20 years with no movement allowed. This effectively removes a batch of chips from the supply side that will never be sold.
But don’t get too excited; look closely at the details. The act requires the Treasury to establish reserves within 180 days, and agencies must report held assets within 60 days. The most critical point is—the act does not authorize direct Bitcoin purchases, only instructs the Treasury and Commerce Departments to study budget-neutral accumulation plans. To translate: the government will not buy, but what it already holds will not be sold.
This is a typical supply-side positive, not a demand-side boost. It won’t immediately bring incremental buying pressure but removes the threat of long-term selling pressure.
BTC: Buy on pullback to 80500–80800, stop loss below 80000, target first 81500, then 82000 if it holds. If it breaks below 80000, patiently wait for 79000.
ETH: 2654, buy on pullback to 2610–2630, stop loss 2580, target 2680–2700.
SOL: 112, buy on pullback to 110.5–111, stop loss 109.5, target 114–115.