Orbit Post Sitemap
If you've been following the digital movement recently, the picture may seem blurry, but for the smart trader, every dip is just a repricing of opportunities and political touches. Here's a comprehensive and practical breakdown of what's happening behind the scenes, with the same numbers and data but a clearer strategic vision. 🔴 Political scene: CLARITY law vote and temporary setback Decisive result: On September 15, the procedural vote on the CLARITY law failed after receiving 49 votes against 50, falling short of the required quorum (60 votes). Price action: Bitcoin (BTC) dropped below the **75,000 level, and heNo matter how beautifully the rebar is tied, if the concrete grade is insufficient, an earthquake will reveal the truth. The $xIBM tokenized US stock asset currently feels like a super high-rise forcibly built on soft soil — the glass curtain wall facade dazzles your eyes, but if you squat down and tap the load-bearing columns, the echo is hollow. Bringing US stock heavyweights onto the blockchain sounds like shifting Manhattan's skyline wholesale into the crypto space, but what really determines whether it can stand is never the rendered image of the token certificate, but the settlement difference between two sets of foundation standards: no matter how fast on-chain settlement is, it can never outpace the flaw detector of compliance review; no matter how deep the liquidity pool is dug, if there is no steel mesh of market makers underneath, the first big withdrawal will cause uneven settlement.
What I fear most in this industry is never a misdrawn blueprint, but misaligned nodes. The stock market has circuit breakers, delivery cycles, and regulatory shear walls, but on-chain there is only a string of prices that can be liquidated within one second. When these two structures are combined, all the stress at the seams falls on retail investors. Look at those traders sharing stop-loss strategies and position allocations; their so-called "real experiences" are essentially records of crack repairs left after each accident — very valuable, but each one reminds you: this system has no concept of final inspection, you only know how high the building stands when the wind blows.
The truly worthy tokenized assets must have a bidirectional anchored steel structure at the base, not a one-sided show apartment. Only when Wall Street's property registration and high-frequency matching can achieve a 1:1 full lifecycle connection with the blockchain can the main structure be considered topped out. Until then, all linkages are just reflections on the curtain wall — attractive, but not load-bearing. #okxtradervoicesCapital signals first: $BTC and $ETH have short-term slipped into key support zones, with risk appetite cooling down simultaneously. The CLARITY Act's progress is obstructed, combined with tonight's Federal Reserve decision, forming a double emotional suppression. The 25bp rate hike is already fairly priced in; what truly influences direction is Powell's post-meeting wording. If the hawkish tone exceeds expectations, the probability of $BTC breaking below 71K and $ETH falling under 2000 will significantly increase. Structurally, $BTC will first test whether 75K can hold; if it fails, attention shifts to 73K to 71K. $ETH is relatively weaker, with 2300 and 2200 as short-term buffers, and 2000 as the critical defense line. More worth watching is whether volume-backed support appears after the news release: $BTC stabilizing above 75000 and $ETH returning above 2350 would indicate a more positive outlook; otherwise, it is advisable to reduce positions. If the legislative process continues to delay, cooling compliance expectations may suppress the willingness of incremental funds to enter. Another risk is that if the support level only consolidates with low volume and no buying follow-up, the rebound may easily become a bull trap. Observation criteria include whether the first hourly candle after the decision closes above the key level. Risk reminder: The above is market observation and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile; please manage your risks independently.BTC Direction Judgment Tonight: **Bearish**
My conclusion: BTC has about a 60% probability of closing lower tonight, targeting a drop to $72,000
**1. Worst position: no safe-haven support and must endure liquidity contraction**
**2. 5% U.S. Treasury yields are a noose for global risk assets**
**3. Warsh's hawkish tone will not soften**
**4. But note — "already fallen in advance" does not mean "the fall is over"**
- **Direction**: **Bearish bias**, but do not chase shorts
- **Key support**: **$72,000** — breaking this level opens the downside space
- **Entry logic**: wait for the **02:30 press conference tone**, after hawkish confirmation, light short positions can be tried; do not bet on the 02:00 decision moment spike
**BTC tonight follows "liquidity expectations," not "safe-haven sentiment." Under the hawkish scenario, it is the most fragile link in the market — much more fragile than gold.**
**My bet: hawkish > dovish, BTC closes lower, target $72,000. " ZEC at $1205, are you panicking?
Let's look at the surface first: FOMC rate hike pressure, a 20% pullback from the highs, retail panic shouting "top reached."
In the past week, it dropped from 1298 to 1070, a nearly 18% decline, then today it rebounded from 1102 with volume to 1205, up 5-8% intraday. Market cap is 20 billion, ranking top 10, with active 24-hour trading. The 1100-1077 support has held multiple times, RSI has dropped from overbought to a neutral-strong 63, and the weekly and monthly large-scale uptrend channels remain intact — oversold rebound, the trend is not dead.
First thing: The first US spot ETF for privacy coins, institutional access is now open.
Grayscale ZCSH spot ETF launches on August 25, with AUM exceeding $500 million. This is the first US spot ETF for privacy coins — got it? Previously, institutions wanted to buy ZEC but compliance wouldn't allow it; now the door is open.
Second thing: NU7 voting results are out, the community voted with their feet.
Around September 14, holders overwhelmingly supported: block time shortened from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, issuance pace unchanged, maintaining Bitcoin-style halving, with some reissuance delayed.
ZEC is faster, but scarcity remains. 21 million hard cap, only 16.87 million circulating. Mining difficulty hits new highs, industrial-grade mining pools entering — miners are voting with real money.
Shielded pool usage rose to 25-29%. Orchard vulnerability was fixed in July.
Third thing: A technical signal that must be taken seriously has appeared.
Today’s volume-driven rise from 1102 shows a typical oversold rebound structure on the 4-hour chart. 1200-1220 is a dense previous high trading zone; holding above 1220 targets 1250-1290 next; if rejected and falling back, supports are at 1165-1170 and 1110.
But don’t forget — FOMC tonight. The market prices in an 80-92% chance of a 25bp hike, the first hike since 2023. The hike itself is priced in; the real variable is how hawkish the dot plot is.
If FOMC is dovish or a "one-time hike," ZEC will surge directly to 1250+; if unexpectedly hawkish, expect a drop to 1100-1077 first — that’s a buying opportunity, not a panic exit.
Bull vs. bear, you decide.
On one side:
- First US spot ETF for privacy coins, AUM over $500 million, institutional access open
- NU7 vote overwhelmingly passed, block time shortened to 25 seconds, halving unchanged
- 21 million hard cap, only 16.87 million circulating, mining difficulty at all-time high
- Weekly and monthly large-scale uptrend channels intact
- Privacy narrative strengthened long-term in the AI regulatory era
On the other side:
- FOMC rate hike tonight, short-term pressure on risk assets
- 20% pullback from 1298, sentiment fragile after leverage cleanup
- Strong resistance at 1256-1298, failed three times
- Privacy coins are highly volatile, rising fast but falling fast too
- Resistance above: 1220 → 1256 → 1298 (previous highs)
- Support below: 1165-1170 → 1110-1077 (strong support) → 1050
Trading strategy
Short-term traders:
After FOMC decision: if dovish and holds above 1220, lightly go long targeting 1250-1290, stop loss at 1170. If hawkish and sell-off occurs, buy low at 1110-1077, target 1200+
Swing traders:
Buy in batches on pullback to 1100-1050 zone if daily doesn’t break 1077, target 1298 then look for 1500+, stop loss below 1000.
Long-term believers:
Treat ZEC as the "privacy version of BTC." ETF channel just opened, NU7 just passed, privacy narrative just beginning. Dollar-cost average below 1100, hold for 1-2 years, target 1500-2000.
You’re afraid of FOMC now, institutions fear not having chips.
You chase highs at 1298, fear at 1205, sell at 1070 — then what money are you really making?
Privacy is not crime; it’s the last freedom in the AI era. ZEC is not a copycat; it’s the only compliant privacy gateway.
ZEC at 1205 and ZEC at 1298 are the same thing. What changes is not the value, but your emotions.
After FOMC lands, will you dare to get on board?
$BTC $ETH $ZEC Today’s Fed decision could bring volatility across crypto. The rate decision matters, but the bigger signal may come from the Fed’s language afterward. 🔴 Hawkish tone → stronger yields/DXY could pressure BTC & alts 🟢 Softer tone → risk assets could get a relief move But there’s another trap: The first BTC candle after FOMC can be a liquidity sweep, not the real direction. A quick move up can reverse. A sharp dump can reclaim the level just as fast. My focus today: • BTC reaction after the anno$LIT /USDT JUST REMINDED ME WHY I DON'T CHASE RED CANDLES.
Watched it drop from 4.6350 to 4.0069, then reclaim 4.3256, up 7.46% today despite a red 7-day. Volatility punishes impatience but rewards patience. Zoom out: 30D +85.48%, 180D +306.15%. Do you trade the dip or wait for confirmation?🔥Everyone is waiting for Wash's statement at midnight! The rate hike is already priced in; the real pitfall is the double liquidity sweep
The entire market is holding its breath waiting for the Federal Reserve's decision at midnight.
The current rate hike expectation has reached 92.5%, making this hike basically a done deal, and the market has already priced in this expectation in advance.
The real risk is not whether the rate will be raised, but the dot plot and Wash's press conference speech. The core focus is on how many more hikes will follow and the policy path.
Trump has always wanted to keep rates low; otherwise, he wouldn't have pushed for personnel changes, aiming for lower borrowing costs.
Tonight, the biggest risk is not a one-sided surge or plunge, but the back-and-forth spikes that sweep liquidity in both directions.
First, they blow up a batch of short positions, then smash a batch of long positions, harvesting both sides before the real direction emerges.
$BTC resistance at 76500‑77300, support at 75000;
$ETH resistance at 2440‑2460, support at 2360.
Do not heavily bet on direction in advance; the decision-driven spikes are extremely brutal. Control your position size, set stop losses, and wait for the outcome before following the trend.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Already, price action is forming an upside wick beyond the 50-week EMA (purple), solidifying a potential bearish retest here If this continues, the breakdown from the EMA will be confirmed EMAs like the 50-week EMA tend to hold as support in Bull Markets and act as resistance in Bear Markets Thus, price struggling to hold the EMA as support just demonstrates that the trend is not yet conclusively "Full Bull" $BTC #BitcoinETH's four-hour trading volume expanded 3.40 times, but the close remains near the low
This volume surge on ETH's 4H chart left a clear directional battle. From 12:00 to 16:00, the 4H trading volume reached 120.97 million USDT, 3.40 times that of the previous bar; the price only dropped 0.20%, with a high of 2411.59 and a close at 2397.27, positioned 21.41% below this bar's amplitude.
The large volume has not yet resulted in an upward breakout. Confirmation condition: subsequent 4H closes above 2411.59 with trading volume no less than 120.97 million USDT; invalidation condition: subsequent 4H closes below 2393.37, indicating continued selling pressure. Which condition would you use to confirm the direction after this volume surge?
#ETH$BTC I was just complaining to a friend about this week's market, but now I have to take back my words, a bit awkward.
Yesterday afternoon, BTC's rebound was weak, every attempt to surge fell short, and volume didn't keep up. I only gave one tip at the time: no one is catching the rise, short positions can be considered.
Entered at 77,261.2, exited at 75,910.0, +174.91% profit realized. Those in the trade should be waking up smiling.
First close 80%, keep 20% to protect the cost price. Don't be greedy for the last bit, pocket the big chunk first.
The market punishes all kinds of arrogance, especially those who think they're the smartest. Chasing highs easily leaves you stuck at the peak, waiting for the next hit. There are still opportunities, don't rush.
$XRP $BNB After regulatory setbacks, the real risk is liquidity
$BTC is repeatedly tugging around $75,000, and $ETH continues to underperform the broader market, indicating that capital is still prioritizing reducing risk exposure. The regulatory bill setback is just the trigger; the FOMC's guidance on the dollar and yields ultimately determines whether the rebound can continue.
If BTC holds $75,000 and spot trading volume expands, there is a foundation for oversold recovery; if the rebound lacks volume and ETH/BTC continues to weaken, the market may still retest previous lows. Going forward, the focus is on capital flow, not a single candlestick. #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 $SNDK and $BTC At this level, those calling for bottom-fishing and short chases are actually betting on the same thing: whether the daily chart can immediately provide direction.
From the project side's perspective, the biggest fear at times like this isn't a drop, but no one to trade. After two days of volatility, shrinking volume is more useful than pulling a needle up.
The bottom isn't shouted, it's ground up. Even if you want to pull it in, it's not that fast; capital entering the market takes time, and it's not something that can be solved by simply saying 'opportunities are for those with patience.'
The risk of chasing short sellers is that if you enter at a low point, if there is a slight rebound, you have to exit; if you don't exit, you just hold on. This calculation is not hard to solve.
So now is neither the time to rush to buy nor to chase short positions. The question is, are you waiting for daily fluctuations, or for a reason you can't even explain?
#美战略比特币储备法案进入委员会审议
#BTC财库优先股融资升温 $SNDK $BTC BTC’s cycle keeps showing a familiar structure: Pump → Correction → Accumulation → Expansion After the $126K top, $BTC dropped sharply and found support around $57.8K. Now near $76K, the bigger question is whether this correction is building another accumulation phase—or needs more time. The levels I’m watching: • $80K–$90K: reclaim zone • $100K: major psychological level • $120K: next resistance area • $126K: previous cycle high • $57.8K: key downside reference The important part isn’t chasingAfter the bill was vetoed, whales are reallocating their positions. The CLARITY bill did not pass, causing market panic, but on-chain funds are quietly shifting direction.
BTC: Significant outflows from ETFs, whales are selling
$BTC is under pressure near 75,000. Spot ETFs saw a single-day net outflow of about $450 million, with Fidelity's FBTC leading with $215 million outflows. More importantly, a certain whale sold 866 BTC (about $65.42 million) and instead bought 26,900 ETH.
$ETH: Funds are accumulating. After falling below 2400, it slightly rebounded, but the whales' reallocation indicates large funds are swapping BTC for ETH. ETH spot ETFs had a net inflow of about $95.44 million on the same day, with institutions stepping in.
$SOL: Continuous ETF inflows, on-chain withdrawals. SOL dropped to the 96-97 range, but the US spot SOL ETF has seen over $200 million inflows in the past month, with nine consecutive weeks of net inflows. Over 3 million SOL have flowed out of exchanges on-chain, tightening supply.
The bill veto caused emotional shock, but whale reallocations, ETF support, and SOL supply contraction—these on-chain actions indicate smart money is using the panic to reposition. Before the FOMC meeting, understanding fund flows is more important than guessing the direction. #OpenAI拟IPO前融资，估值目标达1.2万亿美元
A company that said it wouldn't go public until 2026 is now negotiating pre-IPO financing — FT reports the talks were initiated by investors.
▪️ Target valuation of $1.2 trillion, up 41% from $852 billion in March, in less than half a year
▪️ Annualized revenue just over $40 billion → 30x; Anthropic's $2 trillion ÷ $65 billion is also 30x
▪️ But Anthropic has posted adjusted profits for two consecutive quarters; OpenAI last quarter had $6.7 billion revenue and a $12.3 billion loss
▪️ Last week on OpenRouter, OpenAI's spending surpassed Anthropic's for the first time in 133 weeks, Astra accounts for 19%
The disagreement isn't whether $1.2 trillion is expensive, but who sets this multiple. What supports it isn't cash flow, but that there are only two AI targets in the primary market able to raise tens of billions of dollars.
This benchmark is also shifting. In the same week on OpenRouter, Chinese labs accounted for about 55% of token share, compared to only 14% a year ago.
OpenAI's committed computing power is about $1.4 trillion, even higher than the valuation sought in this round.
For this 30x multiple, do you believe in cash flow or scarcity?Ethereum (ETH) Trend Tonight (On the Eve of the FOMC Decision)
ETH is a high-beta asset, with volatility greater than BTC. Its price swings are usually larger than Bitcoin's, mainly following BTC but with occasional independent spike moves.
Tonight is just a pre-decision game; the real big move will come in the early hours of Thursday with the Federal Reserve decision and Powell's speech.
Key Price Levels Reference
• Short-term resistance: 2460‑2480 USDT. Only if the rebound holds above this level is there a chance to test 2520‑2550;
• First support: 2400‑2410 USDT, a short-term bullish defense line;
• Strong support: 2330‑2350 USDT. A volume-driven break below this range will trigger massive long liquidations and open downside space.
Three Scenarios Tonight
Scenario 1: Range-bound oscillation (highest probability)
Price oscillates between 2400‑2480, following BTC with frequent spikes up and down.
Funds are cautious, volume is average, altcoins follow ETH's volatility without independent major moves.
Scenario 2: Downward retest
Rising US Treasury yields and a stronger dollar lead the market to price in hawkish expectations early.
BTC weakness drags ETH down to test 2400; if volume breaks below 2400, it will quickly test 2330‑2350, amplifying liquidation pressure.
Scenario 3: Short-term rebound recovery
US Treasury yields fall back, risk appetite improves, and ETH rebounds to challenge 2460‑2480 resistance. $Today, I will focus on the three stocks that are most prone to short-term volatility.
First: $PONS
PONS has recently experienced significantly larger fluctuations than ordinary altcoins; after an earlier pullback, funds have started to flow back again. OKX's launch brought new liquidity, and the price is currently testing around 0.6. If this can stabilize and trading volume continues to expand, short-term chasing funds may flow in again; But if massive volume stagnates, profit-taking investors could reverse and dump the market at any time.
Second: VET
VET is experiencing a key event today. The VeChain Interstellar hard fork officially activated, with block height 25,902,540. The upgrade involves EVM capabilities and multiple Ethereum improvements, without changing VET supply. There was already speculation beforehand, and if today's positive news materializes, it shows that funds have not withdrawn.
Third: $ARB
About 92.65 million ARB tokens were unlocked today, which the market usually sees as selling pressure at first. But if, after unlocking, the price doesn't drop and instead surges with volume, it's easy to trigger a rebound after the negative news lands, forcing early shorters to cover the losses.
So today, I will focus on: the volume and price performance of PONS after its listing, the capital attitude after the VET hard fork is implemented, and the actual acceptance after ARB unlocks.$ETH ▍🔻 ETH Quick Report: 7 Hours Countdown to FOMC, 2,390 Sideways Awaiting Verdict
Current price 2,390, the pit dug on the night of the bill has been sideways for 6 hours, neither filled nor deepened. ETH ETF saw a net inflow of 121 million yesterday (BlackRock alone 80.5 million), yet the price dropped 5%—institutions are buying, the market is running, a deadlock between bulls and bears.
▍📍 Market
Fear and greed index slid to 51, Japan's 10-year government bond surged to 3.03% (highest since 1996), global liquidity is all waiting for tonight. Technicals: RSI 49.7, MACD bearish, price stuck between MA20 and MA50, a classic indecision.
▍🎯 Trading Plan
Entry: Place orders to buy at 2,330-2,350 (today's low zone); if hawkish sell-off occurs, buy at 2,300-2,250; after landing, increase volume and retake 2,460 before entering again.
Targets: 2,460 → 2,520, retake 2,550 (50-week moving average) then look to 2,600.
Stop loss: Unconditionally exit if daily close falls below 2,330.
▍⚠️ Decision at 2:00 AM, Warsh press conference at 2:30 AM, dot plot will decide life or death. Halve overnight positions, do not go all in before the verdict.
Not investment advice, trade at your own risk Why did the market suddenly plunge again collectively 😮💨
I just closed my $ETH short position to prepare for a rebound, but instead of a rebound, the price kept dropping, and I got stuck.
Fortunately, my $ZEC short position recovered a bit, otherwise this round of pullback would have been really painful.
Recently, market pressure has clearly increased: the CLARITY Act failed to advance in the Senate procedural vote with 49 in favor and 50 against, after which BTC briefly fell below $76,000; meanwhile, the market is awaiting the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision, and ETH remains highly volatile in the short term.
What’s most frustrating now is:
Will it repeat the old script?
News release → short-term rebound → sentiment recovery → another dip.
But this script can’t be taken as the answer in advance; ultimately, we have to see the post-meeting statement and the market’s actual reaction.
📌 Current thoughts:
Don’t rush to add to ETH long positions; first see if $2,450 can hold;
If $ZEC short positions show a clear pullback, consider gradually locking in some profits.
Market sentiment is already quite fragile, with regulatory news + interest rate expectations stacking up, volatility can easily be amplified.
Don’t guess the script, wait for the market to give the answer.
⚠️ The above is only a personal market record and does not constitute investment advice.
#FOMC #BTC #ETH #ZECThe market is weakening, $ZEC is strongly rising
This wave of consolidation for ZEC is truly textbook-level
First, it retraced along with the overall market trend and firmly held the support above 1500
I've only ever gone long on this coin, never short, as long as it has momentum. Even if it drops and I am bearish, I don't dare to short it.
Looking at those short positions liquidated as fuel, thankfully I remembered this rule. Now a small portion of funds is flowing out again, and it might be difficult to break through the previous high at 1210.
From the intraday chart, it is still above the moving average, showing signs of a potential breakout to 1250 at any time#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 ETH Evening Core Logic · Watershed: 2409. Previously, it was support; after a break, it becomes a cap. If the rebound hasn't been lifted, treat it as a weak rebound. If you want to look at 2459, first hold above 2409 or break through 2414 on increased volume. · Long: Break above 2414 on increased volume, go long on the right, target 2443-2489; Only after holding above 2414 within hours. · Short: Break below 2390 on increased volume, bearish on the right, target 2358-2326; If it breaks below 2390 within 4 hours, follow this view. · Structure: If it can't hold above 2409, return to 2358 to look for a double bottom. If 2358 holds and breaks out of the double bottom, the rebound will have some momentum. 2409 has been holding low and won't rise, 2282 (Fibonacci 1.618) is a precaution. 4 hours: The flag has been broken, and the risk of a closed door remains before it recovers. The first target for the 'draw door' is 2309; If 2309 is lost, the 4-hour rally will pause first, and it's completely cold to see 2236. · Iron Law of Volume: If volume isn't enough, wait. Fake breakouts and breakdowns are easy to get hit, so stop loss must be taken. BTC Evening Core Logic · Qualitative Analysis: Caught between 75,444 and 76,192, with no momentum up and down, a typical exhausting rally. The Fed's rate decision at 2 a.m. is the real event; there's a high chance of exhaustion ahead of that. · Long: 76082 breaks out with volume, light position tests going long, but only rebounds within the range, not a breakout, don't get carried away. Only if it breaks above 76082 within hours can you qualify to watch 77091-77505; If it can't stand above 77091-77505, it's pointless. Short: 75464 breaks below volume and rebounds but can't recover, light position to test short, just treat it as short-term short, not a major levelThe Clarity Act didn't pass, ETFs saw outflows again, and the FOMC countdown has begun. Don't rush to get emotional tonight; first, watch the key levels.
BTC: ETF single-day net outflow is about 290 million, OI is continuously declining, on-chain funds are moving to exchanges, clearly actively deleveraging ahead of the decision. Around 76,000 remains the dividing line tonight. Support at 75,000-74,000; resistance at 77,400-77,800, 80,000. Holding 75,000 means pre-event consolidation; breaking below 75,000 likely leads to liquidity search near 72,600. No shorting before FOMC, and left-side bottom fishing is not recommended.
ETH: Price has returned to the lower edge of the 2,400 range, ETFs still have inflows, institutional buying is more about absorbing supply, not pushing the trend. Support at 2,400, 2,300; resistance at 2,480, 2,515. 2,400 is the bull-bear dividing line tonight. Holding it still offers post-event recovery chances; losing it means don't catch the falling knife at 2,380.
SOL: Breaking below 100 enters a weak zone, fees are biased negative, bears dominate. Support at 95, 90; resistance at 100, 101.5. 100 has turned from support to resistance, watch if funds step in near 95.
Today's direction is decided not by the rate hike itself, but whether the dot plot suggests another move within the year, and how Warsh defines this hike. Major coins are near key levels; reduce positions by default before risk events, and wait until after 02:00 AM to decide direction.
#CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议
$BTC $ETH $SOL This time it was not a final veto, but the Senate failed to get 60 votes to advance the procedure, with the final count being 49 in favor and 50 against, stuck at the procedural stage. The controversy mainly focuses on ethical regulations, stablecoins, and the banking system.
In the short term, this is definitely bearish for the market, with BTC, ETH, and some major coins experiencing a pullback.
But this matter is not completely over yet. Senator Tillis's procedural vote maneuver leaves room for reconsideration, and there is still space for renegotiation, text modification, and further advancement.
So I tend to interpret this as a delay rather than a final outcome. What the crypto community truly lacks is regulatory certainty, and this hurdle was just temporarily not cleared.
#CLARITY投票前分歧未解 🚀"500 Yuan Challenge to Ten Million" Real Trading Record
📅 Day 64
Initial: 75U
Current: 148U
Total Withdrawn: 1800U
Today, continuing to focus on Auntie Tai $ETH.
Recently, the market has been continuously volatile and consolidating. After the CLARITY Act vote was blocked, ETH quickly dropped, and with the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision approaching, short-term sentiment is clearly cautious.
However, from a technical structure perspective, I personally still lean towards watching for rebound opportunities. The market panic is quite heavy now; if ETH can reclaim above $2,500 and further break through $2,620, the market may strengthen again.
Of course, the market is never absolute; if it breaks key support, timely adjustment of strategy is necessary.
Continuing to record, taking it slow and steady.
Wishing all brothers and sisters who see this happiness every day! ❤️
⚠️ The above is only a personal market record and opinion, and does not constitute any investment advice.HYPE'S SHARP FLUSH TESTED PATIENCE
Watched $HYPE drop from 82.5 to 75.19, then reclaim 77.98, still up 1.31% despite a red week. Fast wicks like that separate discipline from panic. I sized down, not up, on the recovery candle. What's your rule for buying strength after a flush?
#FOMCRateCallThisWeek $SOL · Weekly
Zoom out and the whole year fits inside one range. $149 at the top, $60 at the bottom.
Price is $97, sitting just under the level that decides the next leg.
🟢 Reclaim $104 and the measured move could point at $193
🔴 Lose $60 and $29 is what opens up
Spot ETFs hold $1.4B of SOL. The bid is there, the level isn't 👀
Not financial advice · #Solana #SOL #Crypto#AISafetyDebateEscalates Republicans made 126 concessions, Trump accepted about 80% of the ethical proposal, but still failed to win 60 votes. In the early hours of September 16 Beijing time, the U.S. Senate held a key procedural vote on the CLARITY Act. The result was: 49 votes in favor, 50 against, and 1 person did not vote. Far below the 60-vote threshold needed to end the debate, the bill could not be advanced for now. And just one day before the vote, Republican Senators Cynthia Lumis, John Busserman, and Tim Scott released a final 635-page draft, stating they had incorporated 126 substantive amendments proposed by the Democrats. Trump had previously accepted about 80% of the ethical proposals put forward by Tim Tillis and Ruben Gallego. But in the end, it failed. The problem lies precisely in the remaining 20%. 01|What exactly has the Republican Party conceded? The final version has clearly strengthened ethical restrictions. First: Restricting public officials from issuing or sponsoring digital assets. Restricted entities such as the president, vice president, members of Congress, senior federal officials, and federal judges are not only prohibited from personally creating or issuing digital assets, but also from providing "sponsorship" to specific projects through revenue sharing, transaction fees, brand authorization, and other means. Even promoting through names, images, or official positions may also be subject to restrictions. Second: Some crypto assets must be disposed of. If public officials hold eligible "significant economic interests," they must either sell the relevant interests or transfer them to qualified blind trusts. Here, "significant economic interests" have specific thresholds🚨 A regulatory earthquake shakes the scene: The "CLARITY" bill falls and a sharp correction sweeps the market The Regulatory Clarity (CLARITY) bill fell in the US Senate by a wide margin after a vote ended with (49 in favor vs. 50 against), far from the 60 votes required for passage. Although the bill has not been officially declared "dead," the tight timeline and the 2026 midterm election whirlwind make reintroducing it nearly impossible at this time. Liquidity rushed to flee before the dust settled, leading to the evaporation of $770 million from long positions within 24 hours f🔥9/16 Platform Token Sector Overview｜On the Eve of FOMC, Overall Following Market Liquidity
Risk Warning: This article only compiles publicly available overseas information. Virtual currency trading speculation is prohibited in our country and does not constitute any investment advice.
BNB
Relatively resilient among mainstream coins, the exchange cash flow logic still holds, but the valuation premium brought by regulation is shrinking.
Support: 700, 685; Resistance: 730, 760
Viewpoint: Holding above 700 indicates strong consolidation. If BTC holds 75000, BNB is likely to maintain a sideways to strong trend; only a valid break below 700 will trigger a deeper correction. It is recommended to hold a base position and observe before the interest rate meeting, avoid chasing highs.
OKB
Trading within the 108.5-116 range. X Layer and ecosystem expansion are medium to long-term logics, while short-term $行情 follows market risk appetite.
Support: 108.5, 105; Resistance: 116, 120
Viewpoint: 108.5 is the lower boundary of the range; holding it maintains oscillation; breaking below may test the 103-105 range. With FOMC approaching, spot observation is suitable, avoid high leverage.
HYPE
The buyback and burn logic remains, but high open interest contracts and positive funding rates indicate leverage has not been fully cleared.
Support: 75-76.5, 74; Resistance: 81.3-82.5, 86
Viewpoint: The most elastic among platform tokens. 75-76.5 is a key support zone; breaking below 74 will further deleverage; only by reclaiming 82.5 can it challenge previous highs. $ETH 🔥 $ZEC recent popularity is driven by three narratives:
① ETF absorbing circulating supply
Grayscale's ZCSH asset size has exceeded $500 million, holding over 550,000 ZEC, about 3% of the circulating supply. This continuous buying reduces tradable market supply, making price increases more likely to amplify supply and demand.
② Privacy asset repricing
The popularity of stablecoins, on-chain identity tracking, and AI monitoring have sparked more privacy discussions. Zcash, with a 21 million coin cap, PoW mechanism, and optional privacy transactions, is increasingly seen as "digital cash with privacy features," shifting investor focus from mere speculation to scarcity narratives.
③ Leverage-driven acceleration
When previously breaking $1,000, large-scale short liquidations occurred, and forced buy orders further pushed prices up. Currently approaching $1,200 again, if volume breaks through, trend funds may continue to follow; if multiple attempts fail, high leverage could amplify pullbacks.
The biggest divergence comes from regulation: privacy demand continues to grow, but some regions still restrict privacy coin trading. In the short term, watch the $1,200 breakthrough; in the medium term, ETF holdings growth is worth tracking.👀
#波动雷达：币种异动观察 #Robinhood股票代币拟支持实物赎回及投票
On 9/14, Robinhood announced on X that stock tokens will support 1:1 physical redemption and voting. Two tweets, no press release.
However, in its product documents, both of these features are marked as No.
▪️ Tokens are issued by a Jersey subsidiary, classified as debt securities, and only available outside the U.S.
▪️ Prospectus: redemption is cash-only, physical delivery excluded, no shareholder rights
▪️ Underlying stocks can be lent out; during lending, the issuer waives voting rights
▪️ Dividends are not paid in cash but automatically reinvested to buy more shares
The disagreement is not about whether the issuer’s permission is needed to issue stock tokens, but these two features would remove the "no permission needed" shield.
Robinhood currently can say "this is not your stock" because of cash settlement and no voting rights. Once you can exchange for real stocks and vote, it becomes stock — AMC’s "without permission" claim becomes more valid.
To allow token voting, stock lending must stop. Lending is the source of revenue for this structure.
Coinbase spoke out 2 hours earlier the same day, stating 1:1 redemption and dividends are already implemented, voting coming soon.
AMC tokens worth $2.8 million, company market cap $2.6 billion — one ten-thousandth.
Should tokens have shareholder rights? Which side are you on? The CLARITY bill vote failed, the Federal Reserve showdown is tonight, and the crypto community faces a critical juncture
The CLARITY bill failed to pass the 60-vote threshold, legislation is blocked, and $BTC immediately dropped to around 75,000.
The failure of the bill itself is not the most fatal issue; the trouble lies in the regulatory bearish news landing, followed closely by the Federal Reserve's interest rate meeting. In just two days, the crypto community faces two major tests: regulation and liquidity.
Don't focus only on the CLARITY bill; the real market driver is the Federal Reserve, with key attention on Powell's speech.
Key support levels to watch:
👉BTC: 75,000
Holding this means panic selling hasn't destroyed the market; if it breaks down with volume, it will further seek support lower.
👉$ETH: 2400
👉$SOL: 90
I'm not in a hurry to be bearish tonight.
After all bearish news is released, we need to see if the price can withstand the selling pressure.
If the Federal Reserve signals hawkishness but BTC struggles to break below 75,000 and gradually recovers lost ground, it means the market has already priced in most of the bearish news.
The core message tonight:
Don't subjectively guess bullish or bearish, first watch the 75,000 level.
The price action at this level is far more meaningful than empty talk about bulls or bears. #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 $XAUT (gold perp): $4,353.1, +1.51% today, strong sustained climb from 4,281.4 all the way to a fresh 4,354.0 high. MA5/10/20 all rising together in clean bullish order — decisive move.
Contrarian note: Tianfeng Securities flagged short-term adjustment pressure building on precious metals — worth watching given how extended this run already looks against that caution.
No historical % data listed yet for this pair — treat 24h move as the primary signal. $CNPY Last night my hand trembled slightly when setting the stop loss, and this morning I realized it was an unnecessary act of filial piety.
Before going to bed last night, I checked CNPY; after the pullback it held steady, buying pressure strengthened, and it tested downward several times without breaking. I indicated that if CNPY's pullback doesn't break, it's bullish; don't lose patience in the consolidation. Entered long near 0.2452, now at 0.3738, floating profit +1048.93%. The timing was right, this big gain feels good.
Better to miss a limit-up than to catch a falling knife and bleed.
The premise of compounding is staying alive; shortcuts to getting rich often lead to zero.
For longs, take profit by securing 75% first, keep 25% at cost price as protection. Lock in gains first, don't be greedy for the last bit; if it continues to rise, let profits run; if it falls back, don't let gains turn into pain.
For friends who haven't entered yet, listen to me: now is not the time to rush in; chasing highs easily leaves you stuck at the peak. Wait for a more comfortable position in the next round, I will notify immediately.
$ZEC $LAB $LIT is indeed very strong this round, but now directly shouting $2 sounds a bit ridiculous😂
Recently, Lighter's popularity has clearly risen, and the market is also paying attention to its competition with derivatives tracks like Hyperliquid. However, how much of this rally comes from fundamentals and how much from sector sentiment still needs further observation. Recently, LIT has shown a significant volume surge.
$OFC is even more troublesome, with low liquidity and frequent price spikes; even slight fluctuations can shake out small positions. Price discovery for low liquidity assets is inherently prone to distortion, so this coin definitely requires extra caution.
$USELESS is actually quite interesting. Its trading heat has clearly increased recently, with the price once rapidly rising, and it still maintains high attention currently.
But the biggest problem with Meme coins remains the same:
When sentiment rises, everything can go up; when sentiment fades, everything can fall.
Additionally, the US Senate recently failed to advance the Clarity Act, after which BTC retreated, impacting the overall risk appetite in the crypto market.
So when looking at $LIT, $OFC, and $USELESS now, don’t just focus on the gains; pay more attention to volume, liquidity, capital sentiment, and sustainability.
No one knows how high meme coins can fly, but when the tide goes out, the speed usually isn’t slow either.📉The interest rate hike is already beyond doubt, just waiting for the verdict now
Next, the real game is whether Powell's speech will be dovish or hawkish. From the perspective of U.S. Treasury bonds, his speech is more likely to be dovish, after all, being hawkish at this time would be like adding fuel to the fire
More importantly, we need to look at this dot plot. If he still acts arrogantly like before by reducing his speaking time and content, then in the end, we have to look at the chart to see the true intention.
The July dot plot's initial vote laid the foundation for this rate hike, and this dot plot will basically influence the trend for the next three months.
Specifically, the market movement after tonight's rate hike announcement:
Probably, after the announcement, U.S. Treasury yields will fall first, risk markets will rise, but then high oil prices will push Treasury yields back up, ending the risk market rebound.
In short, we are waiting for Trump to solve the oil price problem, otherwise, everything is just empty talk. #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Order cuts landing are more serious than supply cut warnings. $CL and $BTC are not trading on statements now, but on the time gap between pipeline repair and inventory bottoming out.
If repairs drag on for several weeks, spot premiums will take over. The issue with oil prices is no longer how much they rise, but who will be the first to not get the supply. 420 million U was frozen, and as a result, the holder directly sued Tether.
The core of this dispute is not the exchange running away, but that USDT is clearly still in their own wallet, yet cannot be transferred out.
Two Thai businessmen sued Tether, involving about 42.4 million USDT and 10 Ethereum addresses. The plaintiffs claim that under an informal request from U.S. law enforcement, Tether blacklisted the relevant addresses in October 2025, while the formal seizure order only appeared in February 2026. It should be emphasized that these are the plaintiffs' claims in the lawsuit, and the court has not yet made a final ruling on the dispute.
What is truly worth discussing here is:
If the wallet is yours, does that mean the assets inside are completely under your control?
USDT essentially relies on the issuer's smart contract permissions, and the issuer can freeze specific addresses; this is also an important mechanism for stablecoins in compliance and law enforcement scenarios.
The logic of $BTC is completely different:
There is no centralized issuer, nor a company that can directly press the "freeze button."
So true crypto is not just about putting the dollar on the blockchain.
The more core question is:
Who issues? Who can freeze? Who has ultimate control?
This Tether lawsuit just brings this issue to the forefront again.
Stablecoins solve efficiency and dollar circulation on-chain, while BTC emphasizes permissionless and autonomous asset control.
On-chain assets ≠ absolute freedom. The South Korean stock market didn't fall much; what really held up were these two chip sectors
KOSPI dipped slightly by 0.17%, Samsung opened flat, SK Hynix rose 0.77%, nothing dramatic. But looking back after yesterday's AI panic, the previous trading day KOSPI had plunged 3.26%, and concerns about AI slowdown directly smashed core AI hardware assets like Samsung and Hynix. Today, however, there was no further sell-off.
$SKHY still managed to rise against the trend today, supported by real supply and demand logic. SK Hynix is currently discussing domestic memory production in the US with Intel, possibly utilizing Intel's Ohio factory; meanwhile, the company has already established long-term cooperation on next-generation HBM with Nvidia. The market still faces tight AI memory supply, and SK Hynix even believes 2027 could be the year with the tightest capacity.
The real contradiction worth watching is: the AI narrative is starting to be questioned, but AI infrastructure orders and memory supply and demand have not yet been disproven. This is why AI stocks were hammered yesterday, but some chip stocks have already begun to recover today.
This also has reference value for $BTC. BTC is currently around $75,000, just after a 4% drop following the failure of the CLARITY Act, while also hitting the 10-year US Treasury yield at 5% and the Fed decision. The market currently seems more like it's undergoing macro deleveraging rather than a collective collapse of AI asset logic. If semiconductors continue to hold steady, it actually indicates this round of risk-off may have started shifting from "cutting valuations" to seeking assets with real orders and supply-demand support.Some people only notice the whales when they’re making millions, but forget that the same positions can turn against them just as quickly. Look at one of the biggest ETH positions on Hyperliquid: roughly 40K+ $ETH in an 8x leveraged long, with a position size around $100M+. The trade reportedly started around August 31. At one point, the position was sitting on several million dollars in unrealized profit. After the market pulled back, that profit disappeared and the position moved into a multi-That doesn’t mean I believe RAVE has finished moving lower. Actually, I still think there could be more downside from here. My main reason for exiting is simply capital efficiency. The position has become too slow relative to the amount of capital tied up in it. For comparison, another trade I was watching generated roughly 27,000U while using only around 55% of the capital committed to RAVE. In simple terms: • RAVE → larger capital requirement, slower movement • Alternative setup → smaller capiThe key will be how the Fed communicates. If they make it clear this is a one time hike, I’ll be watching for a strong pump toward the 83K–84K major liquidity zone. From 83K–84K, I’m expecting a major correction to liquidate late longs, potentially taking BTC into the 69K–71K long POI. That’s where I’ll look for a swing long for the next leg up.🎯#BTCTreasuryFundingRise Nearly 15,000U of unrealized profit has already disappeared from my account, but I’m still watching the market closely. My current $ETH long is around the $2,360 entry zone, with roughly 3,000U in floating profit. Tonight's market feels different. --- 🟢 $ETH — THE KEY BATTLE ETH's 24-hour liquidation volume has climbed above $200M, with longs taking the majority of the damage earlier. But the interesting part is what happened afterward: short liquidations started increasing as ETH bounced from 🔥 The Clarity Act failed, and the $75,800 tug-of-war $BTC officially began
The U.S. Senate voted 50:49, but the Crypto Clarity Act failed to cross the 60-vote threshold, and the complete regulatory framework to be implemented within 2026 is basically a failure. News broke that within 20 minutes, the market liquidated over $300 million, and BTC once dropped to $74,965.
Macro pressure remains: tonight, the probability of a 25bp FOMC rate hike is 87%-92%, core CPI remains high at 2.4%, and the tightening environment continues to suppress risk assets.
BTC showed support resilience near 75,800, which is a dent after a shock, not a direct trend break, with a slight pullback after the low. However, the rebound is weak, with 77,000-77,600 serving as strong short-term resistance. With the rate meeting approaching, market trading is light, with both bulls and bears waiting for a directional choice.
Market observation range reference: 75,800-75,300 is a key defense zone; If the market exceeds expectations with a hawkish outlook and effectively breaks below 75,000, further support at 72,000-71,000 is needed.
On the counterfeit side, ZEC has shown relatively independent movement, holding the 1040 low and surging above 1150, showing resistance in a broad decline that is worth noting.
Macro uncertainty has not been resolved; controlling positions will always come first.
Do you think the 75300 line of defense can hold out tonight? Let's talk in the comments. #CLARITY法案投票受阻引争议 Willy Woo has directly raised the probability of BTC bottom formation to 90%.
The key is that this time he is not relying on the "four-year halving cycle"—he is deliberately downplaying it. Because the driving force behind BTC has changed: from new supply to liquidity.
The logic is connected like this:
On 9/6, BTC's decoupling from the US stock market reached a level close to 2015; after the last time at this level, the 2017 bull market followed. At the same time, BTC's internal liquidity strengthened, and stocks began to weaken.
On 9/3, he proposed that BTC might switch from a 4-year cycle to a 6–8 year debt/liquidity cycle closer to TradFi.
Last night, the CLARITY vote failed, giving new validation to this judgment:
Coinbase CVD once dropped to about -6,659 BTC—indicating selling in the US; but Binance clearly rebounded from a low position, showing offshore accumulation.
In other words: the US panicked and dumped due to policy news, but global money did not follow.
Of course, this does not mean a straight upward rise. His own model is still watching the short-term holder cost line near $71,000, and if capital flow continues to weaken, a retest is entirely possible.
But if the 90% judgment is correct, the easiest mistake now is to be shaken out by every big drop in the early bull market.
NFA.The market is unusually quiet after the sharp sell-off, but the macro backdrop remains extremely active. The Senate’s CLARITY Act vote failed to reach the required threshold, while Bitcoin briefly traded around $75K and ETH near $2.4K. At the same time, Treasury yields have pushed around the 5% area, adding another source of pressure for risk assets. Tonight, the biggest catalyst is the FOMC decision and updated projections. Markets have been pricing a strong chance of a 25-basis-point hike, butBTC market faces multiple macro and policy pressures, with market sentiment clearly cooling. Currently, BTC price has fallen back to around $75,000, Coinbase platform BTC discount has widened to about $50, and the premium index has dropped to the lowest point in four weeks, directly reflecting a significant weakening in domestic spot buying demand in the US.
The Coinbase premium index measures the supply and demand difference between the US compliant market and overseas markets by comparing Coinbase's USD-denominated BTC price with Binance's USDT price. Data shows that on Tuesday, the index fell to -0.07%, further weakening from Monday's -0.02%, completely reversing the premium-to-positive trend and US market fund recovery seen from late August to early September. The core reason is the failure of the "CLARITY Act" vote to proceed smoothly this week, disappointing market policy expectations and cooling the willingness of US institutions and retail investors to enter.
At the same time, intensive signals of macro tightening continue to arrive, further suppressing risk appetite in the crypto market. The Federal Reserve will announce a key interest rate decision on Wednesday, with the market widely expecting a 25 basis point hike, raising the federal funds rate range to 3.75%-4%. Coupled with tensions in the Middle East, Brent crude oil holding steady above $108, US 10-year Treasury yields breaking above 5%, and global financial liquidity continuing to tighten, asset pressure is evident.
In the short term, the combination of policy implementation falling short of expectations, rate hike bearishness, and rising US Treasury yields has led to a retreat in US market BTC demand. The premium and discount indicators continue to weaken, indicating strong cautious sentiment among domestic incremental funds. CLARITY Act Key Vote: Will It Pass? What Does It Mean for the Crypto Market?
First, clarify: What is being voted on today
The U.S. Senate today (September 15, 2:15 PM Eastern Time) is holding a procedural vote (cloture, to end debate) on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), requiring 60 votes to advance. Note: This is not the final legislative vote, just the "gate" to enter the formal agenda.
The Republicans do not have 60 votes in the Senate (about 53 seats), so they need to pull 7-10 Democrats to pass the threshold. On the eve of the vote, Democratic negotiators are brewing counterproposals and remain dissatisfied with the Republican amendment draft—consensus is far from reached.
Will the vote pass? My judgment: procedural vote 30-40%, legislation within the year less than 20%
Three data sources corroborate: Polymarket gives about a 16-19% chance of "becoming law by 2026" (82% at the start of the year, 35% in August, now a cliff drop); Galaxy Research is more pessimistic, only 10%.
Three hard sticking points: ① Presidential ethics clause (directly related to Trump's crypto income)
② DeFi developer liability division
③ Stablecoin yield clause (directly affects Coinb’s approximately $1.35 billion revenue).
The harsh reality: even if cloture narrowly passes today, the probability of completing legislation by 2026 remains very low—there will still be formal debates, amendments, House review, and the legislative window before the election is closing. The most likely scenario: today's vote "barely passes or fails," and the bill is delayed to 2027-2028 for a restart.
Impact on the crypto market: scenario-based
Scenario 1: cloture passes (about 30-40% probability).
Short-term positive impulse—the market will reignite expectations for "regulatory clarity." But note: this is a procedural vote, not the bill itself, so the rebound space is limited and requires subsequent formal votes to confirm for a secondary amplification. The real big positive is the bill becoming law: BTC/ETH commodity status written into federal law, XRP and other altcoin litigation shadows ending, SOL and others opening spot ETF channels, accelerated institutional entry.
Scenario 2: cloture fails (about 60-70% probability, currently the baseline scenario). Short-term negative but limited damage—because the market has already priced in this outcome: BTC down 15% this year, "regulatory clarity premium" has long faded, and there is still a large $818,000 bet on Polymarket for failure. The negative landing may actually be "fully priced in" rather than panic selling. But the medium-term impact is real: continued regulatory uncertainty = delayed institutional capital entry, suppressing overall valuation levels.
Scenario 3 (most critical overlap): clash with FOMC. Today's bill vote, Federal Reserve meeting on September 17—Goldman Sachs expects a 25 basis point rate hike. Bill failure + rate hike = double negative overlap, BTC may test $75,000-76,000 support; bill failure + dovish hike = negative fully priced in rebound.
For the market, interest rates weigh more than the bill—the bill sets the ceiling, rates set the floor.
Conclusion
The vote is very likely to fail (procedural 30-40%, legislation within the year <20%), but the market has already priced in failure; the real market variable is the FOMC two days later. Operationally: don’t bet one-sidedly—if the bill unexpectedly passes today, reducing BTC positions at the high is the observation window (positive realized); if it fails + rate hike lands, $75,000-76,000 is the position worth buying.
In one sentence: The CLARITY Act is a long-term positive that is "bound to come sooner or later" (very likely to restart in 2027-2028), but today's vote is just the first act of this drama. Don’t treat the procedural vote as the final verdict, let alone as a reason to go all in—the real card to watch is the Federal Reserve on September 17.
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ Let me share my personal view again.
The day before yesterday, I mentioned shorting Ethereum; 2550 and 2580 were short positions. The decline came as expected, hitting a low of 2360. There should still be room below, but it's best to reduce positions because the recent market has been very volatile. The downward trend is still not decisive, so it's better to keep some space for trading (doing T).
After tonight, there will be an interest rate decision at midnight. The result will be either a rate hike or no hike, and although unlikely, a rate cut cannot be completely ruled out. For such data-driven market moves, it's better to clear positions in advance rather than gamble.
Regarding the uncertainty of the rate hike: if it's a 25 basis point hike, the market will definitely drop first and then rise, with a downward spike before settling back into the current range. If the hike is larger, there will be a sharp drop. If no hike occurs, the subsequent rebound will be stronger.
I have said before that after this big rally, a pullback is needed to qualify as a proper bull market. 75,000 is clearly not enough; 73,000 or even lower would be the best pullback in my opinion. But trying to time the bottom is wrong; we can only observe as it unfolds. As long as the market pulls back downward and then returns to the current range, we can confirm this is a bull market and no longer need to waver. If it falls below 70,000, then we should stop fantasizing about a bull market.
Personally, I still lean towards a bull market because of the weekly-level divergence. A 20,000-point rise is not much, and this time the accumulation at the bottom was long enough, so there is still plenty of room above.