Orbit Post Sitemap
#US Treasury Yield Breaks 5%
I am a mid-term intelligence analyst.
The 10-year US Treasury yield briefly surged past 5.04%, reaching the highest level since 2007. Rising oil prices, inflationary pressures, and Federal Reserve rate hike expectations have collectively pushed market risks back into the spotlight.
What really matters now is not whether BTC will rise or fall first, but who will break first—high-valuation growth stocks in the US market, crypto leverage, and REITs will all face pressure.
After all, with risk-free yields approaching 5%, why would capital rush to chase high Beta assets?
In the short term, BTC seems to be battling liquidity. As yields continue to rise, we usually first see leverage cool down and market-making liquidity contract, followed by altcoins coming under pressure.
So don’t treat the “5%” itself as a positive signal. What’s truly worth watching is when the 10-year US Treasury yield confirms a peak and starts to decline again.
In the short term, BTC is focused on the 76,000–78,000 range; upward moves can easily form traps, while downward moves might just be a shakeout. It’s currently not suitable to heavily bet on a one-sided move.
The mid-term logic remains unchanged: high interest rates will eventually undermine credit and the economy, and after liquidity eases again, capital may still flow back into BTC.
The current strategy is simple: mainly cash and stablecoins, low leverage, and patience.
If the 10-year US Treasury yield returns to around 4.7%, then consider increasing offensive positions.
$BTC $ETH $SOLIn three days, it dropped from 0.05094 back to 0.02813, with the funding rate turning negative: the retreat of CVC has just begun
$CVC 24h -18.251%, volume increased to 3.185 times the 30-day average volume, dropping from 0.05094 to 0.02813 in three days, this plunge was fast and dirty.
My judgment: during the retreat phase, I only look to short, not to catch falling knives; open shorts when the rebound is in place.
First, the daily RSI is 87.8 overbought, multi-timeframe signals are bearish; second, the funding rate is -0.00395, open interest down 27.18% compared to the 9/14 record; third, the overall market can't hold, 54 down vs 14 up, BTC 76471 is below ma7 77268.
Resistance above: 0.0289 (15m SAR flips upward) → 0.0341 (1h SAR flips upward)
Support below: 0.02764 (24h low) → 0.0207 (daily MA30, break means looking at lower Bollinger Band)
Watershed: 0.02764, holding this means a weak rebound, breaking it means straight down to 0.0207.
Conclusion: more likely a weak rebound then further decline, not a V-shaped recovery; wait for the rebound to open shorts.
At this level, I only short on the rebound—open shorts near 0.0341, stop loss at 0.0368, hold if it breaks 0.02764 without panicking. I’m watching the post-plunge movement closely to stay on track.
$CVC $BTCXRP today is no longer called the “Ripple payment narrative,” but rather “Before the 1.35 mark, institutions slowly buy, retail investors hold their breath.”
On September 16, XRP hovered between $1.31 and $1.42, even leading the mainstream gains last night (reaching $1.42, +5.4% in 24h), but today it retreated back to test support around 1.35. Unlike the wild moves of SOL, the surge of HYPE, or the frenzy of ZEC, XRP is a “slow burner”: Upbit dominates weekly trading volume, the US spot XRP ETF still had a net inflow of $18.98 million last week, while BTC ETFs are withdrawing—money isn’t absent, it’s just selective.
XRP’s foundation has a strong “institutional flavor”: it was specifically named in the SEC/Nasdaq Texas rules as “meeting the digital commodity criteria,” Ripple describes its bank pilot as a “light switch flip,” and everyone knows about the monthly pressure from releasing 1 billion tokens in custody. But what truly supports the price isn’t the story, it’s the combination of “regulatory boundaries + cross-border settlement narrative + ETF channels” happening together. Still, don’t get ahead of yourself: the SEC v. Ripple fines and appeals haven’t been fully resolved, $1.50–$1.55 is the August trapped zone, and $1.65 is the breakout line analysts talk about.
On the eve of the FOMC, XRP’s three key levels:
1.35 is the face value—if the daily candle doesn’t close back above it, bullish sentiment shifts from “payment bull” to “another shakeout”; Caught in a trap again
I really didn't expect it to drop like this 😩
I thought trading was against human nature
Everyone knows to short
The market should secretly move the other way
But it really kept crashing down
So speechless 😭
—
$ETH I'm not planning to hold on hard anymore
The unrealized loss has exceeded 2300U
The liquidation price is at 2341, which is the scariest
It looks like there's some distance
But actually only about 3% space left
If it can't recover 2456
The short-term will still be weak
If 2405 and 2387 can't hold
It will directly approach my liquidation line
So no more adding positions this time
I'll reduce some positions first to survive
—
$ZEC It clearly resists the drop more when the market falls
But the previous gains were really big
If 1100 holds, a rebound can be expected
If it breaks, it may retest 1050 to 1080
At this level, I only dare to hold a little spot
I won't chase with high leverage anymore
—
$OKB 110 is an important level right now
If it holds, we can look towards around 114.5
The long-term logic still stands
But short-term volume isn't strong
I'll slowly build positions in batches
Won't use it to bet on $ETH for a quick recovery
—
Now I understand
Trading against human nature isn't about fighting the trend head-on
Nor is it about betting 100x leverage that the market will definitely reverse
First, protect yourself
Being alive means having a chance to turn things around next time
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 $BTC $ETH $ZEC
This week's news has been incredibly intense. The key vote on the CLARITY Act tonight might be the real focus.
Currently, the market generally believes that if the bill fails to advance, short-term sentiment could suffer another round of shocks, and a second wave of decline is not ruled out.
As for interest rate hikes, the market has already priced in expectations very fully. The latest interest rate futures show that the probability of a rate hike in September is close to 95%. So many people think: since the negative factors are already fully priced in, even if the rate hike happens, there may not be much room left for further declines.
But I actually think the real issue worth studying is not "whether to hike rates," but rather—why are inflation and economic data so poor this time?
A large part of the pressure now actually comes from energy.
PPI has risen to 5.4%, with energy costs clearly increasing; meanwhile, Brent crude oil has climbed back near $100, and transport through the Strait of Hormuz remains restricted, continuing to pressure global energy supply.
So my somewhat subjective thought is:
If energy prices are the main source of inflationary pressure this round, then solving the energy problem itself could change the inflation trajectory over the coming months.
This is also why I think Trump's repeated emphasis on not over-tightening is not without basis.
His leverage may not be in "controlling the Federal Reserve," but in influencing energy supply and geopolitical risksOne thing caught my attention this week:
Crypto treasury companies are still adding $BTC, $ETH and $SOL even while prices have been soft.
That tells me something.
Short-term traders can change direction very quickly.
Longer-term treasury strategies usually have a different mindset.
They aren't buying because today's candle looks beautiful.
They're building exposure to an asset they believe will matter later.
Of course, that doesn't guarantee price appreciation.
But I pay attention when capital continues moving into an asset during uncertainty.
Sometimes the most interesting signal isn't what people are saying.
It's where the money is actually going.
#FOMCRateCallThisWeek #SaudiOilPipelineDamaged OKB today is neither crazy nor weak; it is the type of coin that "welds 113–114 into a base."
On September 16, OKB was grinding between $113.5–116, with small green and red fluctuations over 24 hours, still up about 7% over 7 days, and up 21% over 30 days. This is a completely different temperament compared to BTC's 76,000 stalemate and SOL's hundred-dollar battle. While others are betting on macro factors, OKB is "reassessing what kind of asset it is": no longer just a fee discount coupon, but an exchange-related on-chain asset with a hard cap of 21 million tokens + X Layer native Gas + OKX Pay / RWA / European USDC margin pairs.
The fundamentals of this OKB round are very clean: a one-time burn of about 65.25 million tokens in 2025, total supply locked at 21 million, removal of additional issuance and manual burns, extremely thin circulating supply. When buying pressure comes, its elasticity is wilder than BNB, but selling pressure is lighter than older platform coins. But don’t be brainwashed by the "21 million like BTC" narrative—X Layer Gas costs near zero, burning only a few cents per transaction. What truly supports the valuation is X Layer TVL (about 230 million), real transaction volume on Pay, how much Aave/Uniswap/Pendle has migrated over, and how far OKX’s compliance licenses have expanded—not the four words "21 million" themselves.
There are just a few key lines during trading:
113–114 is the current base; a pullback that doesn’t break this level = accumulation; All 9 coins rose, but trading volume shrank by 52%
The broad decline in the previous hour was pulled back, but the follow-through did not come back in sync. From 23:00 to 00:00, all fixed 9-coin samples closed higher, yet the total spot trading volume dropped from 179 million to 85.91 million USDT, a decrease of 51.99%.
BTC rose 0.75%, ETH rose 0.69%; corresponding to the 23:00 position bucket, BTC only increased 0.05%, while ETH actually decreased 3.10%. For the next hour, if at least 6 out of 9 continue to close higher, trading volume does not fall below 85.91 million, and ETH positions no longer decline, the recovery can be considered confirmed with incremental growth; if the number of coins closing higher shrinks to 3 or fewer, or trading volume continues to decline, the judgment fails. Which signal would you take as the true standard for follow-through recovery?
#BTC #ETH #OKB#AI development anxiety heats up, chip stocks collectively weaken
Trump livestreams a message to Jensen Huang: AI danger is a scam! Who is lying?
Trump connected live with Jensen Huang and immediately labeled AI risk as a “scam,” saying it’s a conspiracy by politicians and China. Jensen Huang agreed on the spot: “You’re right, we won’t let the slowdown happen.”
Who stands firmer? Honestly, both sides have their own interests. Amodei calls to “hit the brakes,” but Anthropic is secretly iterating its models and preparing to sell cybersecurity products. Trump’s stance is simpler: votes and the stock market are real, data centers are the “oil of the future,” and he’s not easing off the gas.
Who benefits? Computing power chains, data centers, and power sectors—those relying on infrastructure continue to thrive. Who loses? Those working on AI safety ethics and aiming for regulatory business have no chance in the short term. But the market isn’t foolish—Nvidia itself dropped 3.4% on Monday, showing that capital is hesitant: loud warnings don’t guarantee orders will follow.Fundamental Research Report $POL / Polygon (L2/Sidechain) $3.20
Core Judgment: Polygon ($POL) overall score 57/100, rating Narrative outweighs implementation. Breaking down the three layers, the company team has cash reserves, the protocol network shows signs of paid usage, and token value capture has been realized.
Fundamental Breakdown: Polygon (token $POL), L2/sidechain sector. Focuses on ZK+AggLayer upgrade. Competitors include ARB, OP. Traditional enterprise collaboration relies on cloud servers and contract reconciliation; during high concurrency, Gas spikes, TPS is limited, and cross-chain bridge security incidents are frequent. Public chains use a unified state machine for trustless settlement, reducing reconciliation costs. Customer unit price is $50-500/month, requiring USDC or fiat settlement. Narrative-driven sector, usage drops 60-80% in bear markets. Positioned as an end-to-end vertical platform. Product implementation: protocol layer is officially running, on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, with evidence of paid usage. Latest version not found, 60 valid commits in the last 90 days.
User side: address MAU not disclosed, DAU not disclosed, 24h trading volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal natural person monthly active users; large addresses concentrated holdings may overestimate real user count. Revenue side: user fees not disclosed, supplier revenue about 80-90% of user fees (to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury income $2.00M, token holder buyback and burn annualized no burn mechanism. 24h trading volume is business flow, not revenue. Company profit does not equal protocol profit, protocol profit does not equal token holder profit. Code side: 60 valid commits in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is grade A evidence and can be directly verified. Investment background: company equity financing see PitchBook/Crunchbase (grade A), token private and public sales see whitepaper, release schedule, and on-chain unlock contracts (grade A), market makers and ecosystem funding are grade B, not representing long-term holdings by tech VCs, technical integration see API/SDK access evidence (grade B), strategic partnerships and logo wall are grade D. NVIDIA GPU usage does not equal NVIDIA investment, exchange listing does not equal exchange strategic investment.
Token side: total supply 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock 2026-Q4 (adds +3.50% to circulation), annualized burn/buyback no clear mechanism. Must buy tokens to use product? Yes, strong value capture (Gas/staking/service access). Compared with peers (uniform criteria, no cross-sector comparison): Circulating market cap: Polygon $3.00B, ARB undisclosed, OP undisclosed. FDV: Polygon $4.20B, ARB undisclosed, OP undisclosed. Annual revenue: Polygon $2.00M, ARB undisclosed, OP undisclosed. Monthly active addresses or users: Polygon undisclosed, ARB undisclosed, OP undisclosed. Figures based on public data snapshots; missing parts supplemented by official reports or industry standards. Valuation: circulating market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 1500.0x, FDV divided by revenue 2100.0x. Pessimistic view discounts $3.00B by 50-70%, neutral range oscillates, optimistic expects revenue doubling, burn implementation, enterprise clients entering, FDV P/S aligns with leaders. Ultimately: fundamentals solid (score 57/100). Token value capture realized (buyback/burn/Gas). Circulating market cap relatively expensive compared to fundamentals, overextending expectations, FDV moderate. Risk warnings: short-term large unlock dumping, protocol income long-term zero, token demand relying only on incentives (usage collapses if incentives stop). Next focus on these metrics: weekly protocol fees, burn amount, active address retention, TVL/loan balance, GitHub version releases. Information source public, logic self-developed, not investment advice. Data deviation over 30% requires reassessment.
That's all, judge for yourself.
#FundamentalResearchReport #Crypto #Research #OKXOrbit$7.81 million worth of rsETH ultimately ended up in the hands of an MEV bot.
Many people's first reaction is that hackers get counter-killed and justice is enforced. I don't see it that way. Yoink just preempted in block order, the original attack rolled back the transaction, and the money didn't go back to the victim.
BlockSec points the vulnerability to an executor authorization flaw associated with the Safe module, while Blockaid claims Keeper multiple calls lured liquidity modules into the attacker's hook pool. Both sides point to the same thing: the problem lies in the authorization stage, not luck.
The front-runner earned 18.93 ETH, the attacker was out, and the user's money was still lying on that address.
The signal we wait for is who truly recovers the losses.
#标普领投Kaiko. Lay out on-chain data standards $ETH #10-year US Treasury yield breaks 5%
The 5% figure is even more nerve-wracking than the Fed's own decision.
What does a 5% risk-free yield mean? Stock valuations have to be discounted, real financing costs rise, and high-beta assets like Bitcoin are directly put under intense pressure. But interestingly, BTC did not plunge that day. Why? Because the market is swinging between two narratives: one is a 2023-style short-term peak, where yields spike then fall back, giving risk assets a breather; the other is a 2000s-style crisis warning, where high rates crush some link, triggering broader deleveraging.
Next, watch three things closely: whether real yields continue to rise, whether oil prices can hold steady at high levels, and whether the Fed's dot plot reinforces the "higher for longer" signal. Without answers to these three questions, BTC will struggle to mount a smooth rebound.
In the short term, pressure is obvious. ETF funds are flowing out, institutions are hedging, and the long-short battle around 78,000 will repeat. But over the longer term, debt has already exceeded 40 trillion, and high rates are eroding dollar credit. If this ultimately forces quasi-easing or inflation dilution, non-sovereign assets could actually benefit.
Operationally, avoid heavy directional bets before the FOMC. Whether the 5% Treasury yield is a short-lived peak or a crisis warning, wait for the market to give an answer before acting.
What do you think about the yield breaking 5% this time—is it a false alarm or the calm before the storm? Let's discuss in the comments. $BTC $BZ $XAUT HYPE is not showing the "Perpetual King" frenzy today, but rather the pullback at the $80 threshold.
On September 16, Hyperliquid welded between $78.9 and $80.4, with small green and red fluctuations over 24 hours, a 5%–6% retracement over 7 days, yet still up nearly 40% over 30 days, just over 10% shy of the all-time high of $89.6 set on September 6.
While other coins wait for BTC, HYPE waits for trading volume:
The chain relies not on "bullish sentiment" but on whether there are open positions in perpetual contracts for fees → buybacks → burns. When volume shrinks, buybacks weaken; when volume explodes, HYPE goes crazier than SOL. This is a typical compression before the FOMC: bulls are shaken out, Galaxy moves 95,000 HYPE to CEX to press the price, and the Assistance Fund buys 8,000 near 79 — a whale battle, retail investors should not take this as directional guidance.
The three lines remain the same:
76–78 is the lifeline; if the daily close doesn't recover here, the bullish structure shifts from a "high-level continuation" to a "top retest," next target is 73;
80–82 is the pivot; only by reclaiming this can the FOMC risk be priced in and sentiment recover;
84 / 89.6 is the switch; breaking the previous high is not a "catch-up rally," but a revaluation of the perpetual DEX leader back to a $100 expectation. Wednesday review and thoughts. First, the short on Ethereum on Monday at 2483, exited at 2495. The rhythm was off. The execution was also poor. But I have always been confident in my judgment of the long-term cycle; it's just that the details of futures trading are hard to control. Not only me, even friends worth over a hundred million find it difficult to be precise with futures details. You can only manage through position sizing. Back to the market, I pointed out early Monday morning that this week is bearish, with Bitcoin at 822 being a phase top. Similarly, Ethereum at 2660 is also a top. Currently, Bitcoin at 76 is definitely going to break, corresponding to Ethereum at the 2400 level. There will be news tonight and tomorrow night. The detail now is whether there will be another malicious short squeeze rebound. Once Bitcoin effectively breaks 76, the next good long entry is at 73, and Ethereum should be below 2300. For intraday short-term operations, after the news release tonight, look for a spike to enter short-term longs; Bitcoin resistance is at 775-78, Ethereum support turned resistance at 2470. This is normal. For Ethereum, there have been two spikes above 2600 recently; I think it won't happen a third time, and malicious short squeezes shouldn't appear again. The best strategy is to wait for key support levels, like around 73, to go long. Secondly, short on rebounds to short-term resistance during the day tomorrow. For ultra-short intraday trades, like going long at midnight, control your position size. At the current price, chasing shorts is not recommended. In summary, bearish this week. over📉$BTC Why do I feel the next step is more likely to go down first?
Actually, the logic is not complicated. Previously, BTC rebounded from over 60,000 all the way to above 80,000, with a considerable short-term increase. At the current position, it is naturally easier for profit-taking to occur.
Looking at this period of consolidation, BTC has repeatedly tried to break above 80,000 but failed to hold effectively, especially with obvious resistance around 82,000. This indicates that selling pressure above still exists. Unless a new strong catalyst appears, a direct breakthrough and sustained hold is not easy.
Therefore, in the short term, I tend to expect a pullback to retest the lower support.
The key is not "whether it will fall," but whether there will be support after the fall.
If the support holds, and after a low-volume pullback volume picks up again for an upward attack, then this adjustment might actually become the buildup for the next breakout; if the key support is broken with high volume, then we need to guard against further expansion of the correction.
Currently, there is no rush to guess the top, nor to blindly buy the dip. First, see if the 82,000 resistance can be broken, then see if the lower support can hold.
Let the price give the answer to how the market will move.
#CLARITY投票前分歧未解 #10年期美债收益率突破5% #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ ZEC today is not called a “privacy coin rebound,” but rather “licking blood at the blade after four bullish candles.”
On September 16, Zcash hovered around $1135–$1145, retracing about 5% in 24 hours, but still up 34% over 7 days and 123% over 30 days — this kind of candlestick is the most deceptive: the trend isn’t broken, but leverage is already drunk. Futures open interest is about $240 million, with over $10 million long liquidations in 24h, and Binance’s long-short ratio at 0.95, indicating the market is full of people “afraid of missing out but also afraid of a sudden drop.”
ZEC’s underlying story is wilder than its price: Grayscale’s ZCSH has brought privacy coins to the NYSE facade, Ironwood has fixed old vulnerabilities, shielded transactions have surged to 28%–29%, NU7 voting closed on 9/14, and block time/smooth issuance are on the table — the “privacy + ETF + supply tightening” trifecta is happening simultaneously, something that will only occur once by 2026. Yet RSI at 62 is not overbought, and above 1300 lies a graveyard where no one has recovered since 2016. The more it looks like an “institutional bull,” the easier it is to be crushed by leveraged insiders the night before the FOMC.
Still, those three key levels:
1113 is the pivot — daily close above here lets bulls still claim a “continuation”;
1022 is the lifeline — losing this is not just a shakeout, it’s a bloodbath at 934 and a break in the bullish structure; SOL volume has returned to half but still selling off, no one caught at 104.8, directly dropped to 98.
Yesterday opened at 100.3, highest 102.3, lowest 99.0, closed at 102.0, volume 63.94 million. Today opened at 102.0, highest 104.8, lowest 98.0, current price about 99.4. Volume 86.27 million, increased compared to yesterday, still a bit short of Friday's 110 million.
Resistance remains between 102.0–104.8, even heavier at 105.8. Support first looks at 98.0, if broken easily see 97.9.
Don't chase the current price for short-term. Those holding already should watch if 98 support holds; if not, reduce a bit. Volume has returned, but if 104.8 can't hold, reduce again, wait for the European and American sessions to see if it can stand above 99 again. $SOL #US Treasury yield breaks 5% #BTC #ETH #SOL
I still hold the same view: in the mid-term, focus on the logic; in the short-term, first watch where the funds will withdraw from.
After the 10-year US Treasury yield approaches or even breaks through 5% again, what really needs caution is not whether BTC will rise immediately, but that the funding costs for high-valuation assets are clearly rising.
When the risk-free yield reaches close to 5%, growth stocks, cryptocurrencies, REITs, and highly leveraged trades will all face repricing. Funds can easily choose to hold US Treasuries for relatively stable returns, and naturally won’t chase high Beta assets as crazily as in a low-interest-rate environment.
So don’t simply interpret it as:
"US Treasury yield rising to 5% = BTC immediately bottoms."
What truly deserves attention is the turning point of the yield.
If the 10-year yield just breaks above 5%, risk assets might actually face further pressure; only when the yield peaks and then starts to fall steadily can the market possibly trade easing expectations again, making it easier for BTC to gain liquidity support.
In the short term, BTC is currently fluctuating roughly between $75,000 and $79,000.
An upward push without volume support can easily become a bull trap; a rapid downward spike might just be clearing leverage. The hardest part now is chasing highs and selling lows, as both sides are prone to being stopped out. The stratigraphic profile has already been cut down to the bedrock; this is not a panic sell-off at all, but rather another exact imprint of human nature on a clay tablet from thousands of years ago.
100U field excavation doubling challenge Day 9, currently the net value on hand has advanced to 186U. Holding a shovel in this crypto wasteland, every fragment must be meticulously checked, never daring to be extravagant.
$AEVO's current price has been smashed to 0.02159, the 1-hour RSI has already sunk deep to 35.5, and heavy selling pressure soil accumulates at the Bollinger lower band of 0.02144. Flipping through the ancient scrolls of human economic history, one will understand that all the embarrassing retreats after prosperity ultimately amount to a layer of black-gray carbonized soil in the excavation.
History repeats the cycle of bulls and bears; there is nothing new under the sun. Retail investors are panic selling their chips, while I have already identified the contours of early artifacts on the rammed earth base at the Bollinger lower band. 0.02195 is the first low wall left by the ancestors when they retreated, and 0.02247 is the remnant of an even older city rampart.
- Target: $AEVO 🟢
- Entry: 0.02145 - 0.02165
- TP1: 0.02195
- TP2: 0.02245
- SL: 0.02115
If it breaks through 0.02115, it means that below is not a cultural layer but a bottomless quicksand collapse; the shovel in hand must be pulled out immediately, cutting off all illusions. If the rebound hits the old city bricks as expected, taking this rebound will allow this grassroots pioneering capital to move one step closer to the 1000U ancient temple treasure.
All panicked retreats will eventually solidify into the clearest bottom sediment layer in the geological stratigraphy. 🏛️📜
#StrategyPlaybookSOL is not shouting "100-dollar defense battle" today; it has already taken 100 dollars as its life support.
On September 16 intraday, Solana fluctuated between $100.4 and $102.2, dipping to 99 last night before being pulled back above 101; up 35% in 30 days, almost flat in 7 days, slightly green in 24 hours—a typical "FOMC eve where bulls dare not charge and bears can't push down."
While other coins wait for BTC, SOL is the frontrunner in high beta: when BTC catches its breath, it trembles first; when risk appetite returns, it surges first. Its fundamentals haven't collapsed—DEX spot volume continuously surpasses Coinbase/Bybit/Kraken, BSOL capital inflows hit record highs, Alpenglow has pushed the endgame to 150 milliseconds—these are not fabricated narratives. But the price is stuck before the 100–104 wall, RSI is not low, open interest is heavy, leverage is not clean; "fundamentals exist, but no new funds" is the most frustrating combination right now.
Three lines to repeat:
100 is face value; if the daily close doesn't reclaim 100, sentiment immediately shifts from "SOL always rises" to "SOL traps people again";
97.9 / 96.2 is the lifeline; losing it means looking at 91.5, breaking 89–90 means trend breakdown, and 80 dollars is no longer just a verbal threat; 📡 ARB Tactical Analysis | $0.1477 | Strong Against the Trend
🔥 Strong Catalyst (just released today): Standard Chartered Bank issued a report predicting ARB will reach $10 by 2030 (+70x), citing Robinhood Chain revenue and calling ARB "severely undervalued." CoinDesk/The Block/FXStreet all covered it. This is why it dared to rally against the market weakness today.
📍 Multi-timeframe (Binance Futures):
15m volume surge (volume ratio 2.64x, RSI 72) → 1h volume ratio 1.57x → short-term funds are really entering
But 4h volume ratio 0.63x, 8h 0.25x → sustainability of the rally is questionable, don't treat it as a one-sided trend
Daily: price 0.1477 > daily E21 0.1322 (+11.7%), bullish structure intact
Funding rate +0.002% (≈0), no long crowding, healthy $ARB ETH today is not called the “Ethereum bull market,” but rather the “No. 2 holding its breath before 2500 dollars.”
On September 16, intraday, Ethereum fluctuated between $2410 and $2520, dropping slightly by 2%–3% in 24 hours, retracing from 2664 to a low of 2388 over 7 days, yet the monthly chart still rose by 28%—a typical case of “mid-term is fine, short-term choked by macro.”
BTC is grinding between 76,000 and 78,000, so ETH can’t expect to fly solo. ETH’s fate now doesn’t lie in DeFi, staking rates, or L2 fees, but in the Fed’s mouth on 9/17: a 25bp rate hike is basically priced in, the real bomb is the words “higher for longer” in the dot plot.
- If after the hike they say “one-time defense” → 2480 holds, ETH rebounds to 2550, then eyes 2800;
- If after the hike they say “cycle restart” → 2388 doesn’t hold, supports at 2215 and 1965 will bleed;
- If by chance no rate hike (low probability) → risk assets will surge after bad news is fully priced in, ETH first hits 2600 then talks 3000. The DOGE rollercoaster market is really tough for ordinary people to handle, dropping straight from 0.086 to 0.0805.
Yesterday it opened at 0.0835, peaked at 0.0849, bottomed at 0.0819, closed at 0.0841, with a volume of 29.07 million. Today it opened at 0.0841, peaked at 0.0861, bottomed at 0.0805, current price around 0.0817. Volume is 32.41 million, still short of Friday's 44.82 million.
The resistance above is between 0.0841–0.0861, with 0.0883 being even stronger resistance. On the downside, watch 0.0805 first; if it breaks, 0.0825 is easy to target since Thursday's low has already been broken.
Don't chase the current price in the short term. For those already holding, watch if 0.0805 support holds; if not, reduce your position. If volume shrinks, consider it as continued digestion around 0.088, and wait for the European and American sessions to see if it can reclaim 0.082. $DOGE 📉 With $CP plummeting nearly 90%, why did I choose to short instead?
$CP
Many people see a coin drop 90% and their first reaction is that it's a buying opportunity 🤔
But after suffering big losses with altcoins, this time I chose to go against the trend and short.
In the early days, I also fell into this trap: seeing an altcoin drop 90%, I subjectively thought it couldn't fall further and decisively bought the dip.
But there was a basement below the floor, with continuous slow declines, resulting in heavy losses 💸.
Many altcoin schemes first pump to create hype, then start a long-term slow decline once the heat fades. A large drop never equals safety.
Looking at $CP's current status 📊: hype has basically faded, 24h trading volume is under 10 million USDT, only 47 liquidations all day. Price volatility looks intense, but incoming funds keep shrinking, liquidity is getting worse.
✅ My move: I've already entered a short position, but I won't stubbornly hold it.
I hold as long as margin is sufficient, but once risk control levels are breached, I immediately stop loss and exit to admit the mistake.
Of course, leaving a suspense ✨: if it can still rally against the trend, then I have to admit $CP's resilience exceeds expectations.
What do you think about altcoins after a crash—should you buy the dip or follow the trend and short? BTC is not showing a sharp surge today; instead, it's "holding its breath on the eve of the FOMC."
On September 16, during intraday trading, Bitcoin was tightly stuck between 76,600 and 78,000, briefly dipping to 76,900 in the morning session and rebounding to touch 78,000. Over 24 hours, it fluctuated slightly without losing its base, but no one dared to push it higher. The 10-year US Treasury yield broke 5%, the US dollar index rose, and spot BTC ETFs saw continuous outflows. The macro environment feels like a screwdriver tightening bit by bit; yet the support between 76,600 and 76,800 is absurdly strong—any drop is met with buying. This is neither a bull market peak nor a bear market breakdown, but a mid-stage stalemate of "waiting for the Fed to finish its statement."
The market already knows there's an 85%+ chance of a 25bp hike, so the rate hike itself is not a bomb. The dot plot and Powell's wording are the real factors:
- If he says "a one-time defensive rate hike, then data-dependent" → the bad news is fully priced in, BTC will first shake out then rally, aiming for 80,000 and then the 82,300 liquidation zone for short positions;
- If he says "higher for longer, possibly more hikes this year" → support at 76,600 won't hold, triggering a liquidation zone of over 1.78 billion long positions below 75,200, with 73,800 and 72,000 levels bleeding in sequence;
- If (very unlikely) he holds rates steady → the market won't be grateful but instead panics, fearing the central bank is scared, causing volatility even greater than a rate hike. When $BTC weakens, the $ARB trading page takes priority over $SAGA: recently +3.08% in 1h, 24h trading volume $29.3M, momentum isn’t just supported by the leaderboard colors. The reason to keep watching it is that after a period of gains, the volume can still keep up, and the top 20 buy orders are thicker 🌊 However, don’t treat B-level opportunities as a free lunch; 0.1567 is the position where the odds clearly improve; if it can’t break through, attention should cool down.$CHIP I didn't even check the market, came back and looked, hmm? When did this happen?😳
Just after lunch when I checked the market, CHIP was already under high pressure and dropping, strong sell orders, low volume, and weak rebounds. I had already warned before, don't stubbornly go long in this kind of structure, wait for confirmation on shorts.
The big profit came a bit suddenly: short at 0.05388, current price 0.03744, yield +609.13% realized.📉 Worth the wait.
Position action: first close 80%, take profits when you should; keep the remaining 20% at break-even to protect, let profits run if it keeps dropping, don't give back gains on rebounds.
The market punishes all kinds of arrogance, especially those who think they're the smartest. Don't get greedy with profits, don't despair with pullbacks.
For friends who haven't entered yet, listen to me: now is not the time to rush in, chasing shorts easily leads to getting caught in rebounds. If you miss it, don't chase; wait for the next signal, I'll notify when it comes.
$SNDK $BTC BTC's spike to 79600 today quickly dropped afterward, and no one dared to follow the wave at 79896.
Yesterday's low was 76395, the high reached 78704, and it closed at 78576. Today it opened near 78576, peaked at 79600 but didn't break through, the low was 77125, and the current price is about 77125. The volume ratio shrank compared to yesterday; no one is pushing the price up during this rally.
There is still resistance between 79600 and 79896 above. If 77125 below breaks again, it’s likely to first test 76395; if that level also fails to hold, the short term may look for space around 76001.
In the short term, watch if the current price can hold at 77125. If it can't hold, consider it as still digesting the drop from 79896, and don't chase the current price. For those already holding, watch if the support between 77125 and 76395 holds; if it doesn't, consider reducing positions. For those looking to buy the dip, wait for a pullback and see if 79600 can be broken before considering entry; don't catch a falling knife mid-air. $BTC $CORE risks are becoming increasingly worthy of attention: what truly needs caution is not just the price drop, but the changes happening in trading liquidity.
Many are still expecting the next narrative reboot for CORE, but the signals released from the exchange side now cannot be ignored.
After an anomaly in validator rewards appeared in early September, the project team initiated an emergency hard fork, and multiple trading platforms temporarily suspended CORE deposits and withdrawals. The project team stated that this upgrade is a forward upgrade and will not roll back historical transactions, but market concerns about supply, abnormal rewards, and subsequent liquidity have not completely disappeared.
More notably, OKX announced on September 1 that it would discontinue the CORE on-chain earning product and suspend new subscriptions, with related funds redeemed early from the on-chain protocol. This action itself does not mean "OKX is delisting CORE spot," but at least indicates the platform is adopting more cautious risk management for CORE-related products.
Also, do not confuse "suspending deposits and withdrawals" with "official delisting."
For example, after Bitget suspended CORE network deposits and withdrawals at the end of August, it reopened deposit and withdrawal services on September 10, indicating that some exchange restrictions were risk controls during the event period, not permanent exits.$ETH in 24 hours -4.01% versus BTC -2.92% — difference -1.10 percentage points.
With a position of 14% within the daily range, the question is simple: is this real relative strength or is the movement already fading? Some trades are just like this: the more you watch them, the more they stall; the moment you look away, they move. When the screen is full of green, $MINA faces high-level resistance, the rebound is weak, and no one is buying on the way up. I judge that the bearish structure is intact, suggesting to short on resistance, don’t catch blindly.
If the trend isn’t broken, hold on; if it breaks, exit—don’t fall in love with stocks.
From 0.09965 down to 0.08244, +345.2%, feeling good brothers, time for a good meal. First, take profit on 80% of the position, keep 20% as cost protection, let the profit run on further drops, and don’t give it back on the rebound.
The premise of compounding is survival; the shortcut to getting rich often leads to zero. For friends who haven’t entered yet, listen to me: if you miss this, don’t chase, wait for the next opportunity, I will notify you immediately.
$ZEC $ADA 🟠 $BTC + 🔵 $ETH | 15M
BTC still controls the short-term market structure, while ETH is becoming the key indicator to judge whether this rally can continue to spread.
Currently, focus on three signals: price trend, volume, and open interest.
📈 BTC stabilizes + ETH breaks through in sync
→ Market participation increases, and the rally has a chance to accelerate further 🚀
⚠️ BTC stabilizes + ETH is clearly weaker than BTC
→ The rise may only be a local strength, market breadth is insufficient, beware of a pullback after the surge.
💡 New key value:
Don’t just watch whether BTC is rising, but also observe whether funds are spreading from BTC to ETH and other mainstream assets.
BTC determines direction, ETH verifies market breadth, while Volume + OI help judge whether this breakout is driven by real funds or caused by short-term leverage volatility.
🔥 The real question now is not "Can BTC rise?" but:
Does this rally have enough market participation to support the next phase of expansion?
#BTC #ETH #Crypto #Bitcoin #Ethereum #FOMCRateCallThisWeek2. Core Cause of Loss: Clinging to Old-Level Positions, Unwilling to Exit
In a leveraged environment, you must remember: once you make a profit, you need to exit immediately.
If you continue holding the position after gaining profit, the market will soon enter another cycle, another level. The certainty that this trade relied on no longer exists.
Many people lose money because of this: the market level has already shifted, but they still hold the original position. Leverage itself amplifies gains and losses; at this point, even a slight reverse movement in the market can quickly erode profits or even cause liquidation.
A trade only serves the current level. Using leverage, we capture the certainty of returns at this level of the market. Once this level’s movement ends and certainty disappears, leverage turns from a profit tool into a risk tool. You cannot stubbornly hold a position to withstand the next opposing market level. Failing to exit promptly when the current level ends means using old positions to fight new levels, which leads to losses.
At the same time, failing to manage one level well will affect subsequent operations. Positions get stuck, funds and mindset are locked up, and when the next high-quality opportunity at a new level appears, there is no capital or mindset to seize it. This may even lead to impulsive cross-level averaging down, causing losses to continue to expand. $ETH $BTC
Tonight the market is once again showing a "long and short double liquidation".
On the $ETH side, although the #CLARITY bill vote hasn't officially started, on-chain data shows that in just over an hour, long position liquidations have already approached $75 million. Is this more like taking profits early, or is capital using the news as an excuse for a quick shakeout?
Yesterday it was the shorts being squeezed, and today it's the longs getting liquidated—the market's back-and-forth action is indeed a bit baffling.
I now feel that in the short term, the biggest risk isn't simply a "bull trap" or "bear trap," but the high volatility stop-loss sweeps before the news lands. The market is trading ahead of the #CLARITY vote expectations, combined with this week's FOMC, interest rate decisions, and rising rate hike expectations, making capital prone to rapid in-and-out movements.
If the negative news has already been priced in early, the actual event may not cause a further deep drop; conversely, if market sentiment weakens again, a second round of long liquidations can't be ruled out.
So tonight, don't rush to guess the direction; focus on observing volatility and volume changes around 2:30 AM 👀
At this stage, less chasing highs and selling lows, and more patience, might actually be more important.
#CLARITYVoteUnresolved #ThisWeekFOMCReveal #RateHikeOutcome #ETH #BTC #CryptocurrencyETH's spike to 2615 today was immediately smashed down to 2389, and no one dared to follow the 2667 wave.
Yesterday's low was 2465, the high touched 2535, and it closed at 2508. Today it opened near 2508, the high didn't surpass 2615, the low was 2389, and the current price is about 2429. The volume ratio is much larger than yesterday, indicating a sell-off push down.
There is still resistance from 2615 to 2667 above. If 2389 below breaks again, it’s easy to first see 2406; if this level can't hold either, the short term will look for lower space.
In the short term, first watch if the current price around 2429 can hold. If it can't hold, consider the spike at 2667 completely digested and don't chase at this price now. For those already holding, watch if the low at 2389 today can hold; if it can't, reduce some positions. For those wanting to catch a dip, wait for a pullback; if 2615 can't be surpassed, then reconsider—don't catch a falling knife mid-air. $ETH Preface
Traders continuously suffer losses, give back profits, and repeatedly get liquidated. The root cause is often not the inability to understand entry and exit points, but a lack of respect for market levels. Market levels essentially represent the attribute of bullish and bearish transitions. When the market completes a bullish-to-bearish switch, it enters a completely new level, and the trading logic of the previous stage becomes invalid. Under leveraged trading, this rule becomes even more stringent.
1. What is a Market Level
A level is the attribute of bullish and bearish transitions in the market.
When a bullish phase completes and reaches a peak, the forces of bulls and bears reverse, and the trend turns downward, this means switching to another level. A bullish market is one level, a bearish market is another level, and the logic of these two levels is completely independent.
In leveraged trading, you only profit from the certain movements within the current level. Leverage is merely a tool to amplify this certain fluctuation; it cannot help you predict how the next cycle or next level will behave.
Once the market leaves the current level and enters a new cycle, the original certainty disappears, and volatility risk increases sharply.
For example:
Within a small bullish level, if a position has already gained profit and reached the end of this bullish phase, you must immediately close the position and exit. After closing, by following the trend and shorting, you can capture the next downward move and gain 50 points.
The bullish phase follows one set of logic; after switching to a downtrend, it belongs to a new level and requires a corresponding change in trading approach. $BTC $ETH $ZEC
The negative factors have basically all materialized one by one, so it's time to start thinking about a question:
When everyone in the market already knows what the worst outcome is, how much damage will the actual announcement cause?
Currently, the market's expectation for a Federal Reserve rate hike is very high, even exceeding 90% at one point. Normally, such a hawkish expectation should have already hammered risk assets much deeper.
But BTC has not continued to experience a continuous crash; instead, it has shown clear support around 75760.
This is actually worth paying attention to.
Because what the market fears most is never the "already confirmed negative news," but the "negative news that exceeds expectations."
If a 25 basis point rate hike has already been fully priced in by the market, then after it actually happens, there might instead be a "negative news realization" rebound.
Of course, we can't directly treat the rate hike as positive yet; what really needs to be watched is:
Whether the Fed's wording after the rate hike is more hawkish than the market expects, and whether there is room for further rate hikes afterward.
Currently, oil prices have climbed back to high levels, and the 10-year US Treasury yield is approaching or even breaking 5%, which means inflation and interest rate pressures remain significant, so short-term volatility will definitely not be small.
But if the worst expectations have already been traded in advance and the actual result does not worsen further, then BTC might instead usher in a round of valuation recovery.
If the 75760 level can continue to hold, I am more inclined to observe an upward rebound afterward. 🇺🇸 CLARITY ACT UPDATE:
Bessent is supporting the bill and says he is pushing for its passage because it would give the Treasury “more authorities to seek out this evasion.”
Sherman raised concerns that Bitcoin reserves could be lost quickly and argued that the U.S. should prioritize strategic reserves such as oil and rare earths.
But Bessent’s broader message was clear:
America wants to remain the crypto capital of the world.
#FOMCRateCallThisWeek
#AIAnxietyHitsChipStocks $ETH Analysis of the market before the crypto bill!
This round of decline mainly follows the weakness linked to the US stock market;
The market has basically digested the pullback priced in advance for the bill expectation in the 2610–2500 range.
As mentioned before, a valid break below 2465 signals market weakness, and this signal has already been realized.
Currently, ETH is able to find support near the low of 2380, largely relying on BTC's key support at 76000; overall, it is still operating within a wide oscillation range of 2350‑2550.
Key focus is on the clear procedural vote on the bill at 2:15 AM:
The market generally expects a low probability of passage this time; if the result is worse than expected, the market may continue to weaken further.
If a deep correction follows, the plan is to gradually buy in the 2100‑2200 range.
At this stage, there is no clear confirmation of a breakout or breakdown, so it is not suitable to subjectively bet on the direction in advance; just wait for the price to move out of the range before following up at the right time. Greed index 69, volatility nearly 9.5%, is this trade still worth opening? Yes, but only with a light position for a short-term long.
$TAO current price 225.4, MA5 still below MA20, RSI 37.3 close to oversold, Bollinger lower band 221.8 is the last line of defense; funding rate +0.005% indicates bulls are not overheated. Entry 223-225.5, take profit 1 at 229.1 (MA20 resistance), take profit 2 at 236.3 (Bollinger upper band). Stop loss 218.5, exit if it breaks below the lower band, do not add positions before MACD histogram -0.377 turns positive. Also watch: $BLUR, $ACH, the latter is relatively weak, do not chase.
(Personal opinion, for reference only, not investment advice. Contract trading is highly risky, please strictly control your position size.)
【Data】
Coin: TAOUSDT
Direction: Long
Entry: 223-225.5
Take Profit 1: 229.1
Take Profit 2: 236.3
Stop Loss: 218.5 Spent the day watching ETH hold up while everything else fell. Told myself that meant something.
By evening it didn't matter BTC -2.2%, ETH -3.7%, SOL -3.3%, FIL down 7%. Whatever was separating them this morning just stopped separating them.
US10Y still pinned near 5%, Senate voting on Clarity Act today, FOMC tomorrow. Too much stacked on 48 hours for anything to hold its own story for long.
Not forcing a read tonight. Some days the market just wants to move, not explain itself.
$BTC $ETH $BTC $ETH $ZEC
What’s really worth watching tonight isn’t just the price, but whether two “thunderclaps” will strike together: the CLARITY Act vote + FOMC rate hike expectations.
Currently, there is significant market disagreement on whether the CLARITY Act will pass smoothly. The Senate procedural vote requires 60 votes, and the latest market pricing shows a clear decline in expectations for the bill’s final passage this year. In other words, the negative news has already been partially priced in by the market.
So my judgment is actually quite simple:
If the CLARITY Act doesn’t pass tonight, there will likely be a short-term emotional sell-off, but if there is no new unexpected negative news, the scenario of “negative news landing → selling pressure releasing → quick rebound” cannot be ruled out.
What really makes me cautious is the FOMC.
Currently, the market’s expectation for a 25bp rate hike is close to or even exceeds 90%, and both U.S. Treasury yields and oil prices are at high levels. The 10-year Treasury yield briefly broke 5%, indicating a clearly tight macro liquidity environment.
But there is also a reverse logic here:
If the rate hike itself has already been fully priced in by the market, then what really determines BTC’s subsequent direction may not be "whether to hike or not," but Powell’s wording, the dot plot, and the future interest rate path.
If the rate hike meets expectations and even signals "this round of tightening is nearing its end," it could instead trigger a pattern of first short selling followed by a rally.OranjeBTC, Brazil's largest Bitcoin treasury company, today listed DIGY11 on B3.
This is Brazil's first ETF on the exchange primarily focused on "Bitcoin treasury preferred shares": an initial allocation of about 95% in Strategy's STRC, about 5% in Strive's SATA, not directly holding coins, but earning USD dividends from the preferred shares, then converting to Brazilian real and distributing monthly to holders, with currency hedging.
According to the issuer, the current annualized distribution target is approximately the Brazilian interbank rate CDI plus about 3–5 percentage points (estimated after fees, not guaranteed). Itaú BBA handles structuring and distribution, 3R manages the portfolio, and the index follows MarketVector.
On one side, there is the US CLARITY programmatic voting and tomorrow's FOMC pressuring risk appetite; on the other, Latin America is turning treasury yield products into tradable shares—adding another institutional path. DIGY11 is not guaranteed by FGC, with credit and dividend policy risks present, so don't consider it a guaranteed deposit. #本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？ #CLARITY投票前分歧未解 #Strategy回购约1.39亿美元STRC $BTC $ETH Term Structure Radar
$BTC annualized pricing at three expiration points is not unidirectional: the near, mid, and far-term annualized basis are +12.35%/+5.56%/+5.68% respectively; the raw spread of the near-term contract relative to the index is +$250.5.
$ETH annualized basis decreases with expiration term: the near, mid, and far-term annualized basis are +4.99%/+4.47%/+4.00% respectively; the raw spread of the near-term contract relative to the index is +$3.21. The near-term annualized basis is higher than the far-term, with higher annualized pricing concentrated near term.
$SOL annualized pricing at three expiration points is not unidirectional: the near, mid, and far-term annualized basis are +8.74%/+1.56%/+1.90% respectively; the raw spread of the near-term contract relative to the index is +$0.23.
BTC, SOL: The mid-term expiration breaks the monotonic arrangement; the difference between near and far terms is insufficient to summarize the entire curve.
BTC, ETH, SOL: All three expiration points are in contango.$LAB suddenly surged 7% in the middle of the night, so I reversed and opened a small short position 👊
LAB didn’t sleep at night, a big bullish candle shot straight from 0.048 to 0.0537, up more than 7 points. This coin has dropped 99.66% in 90 days, usually dead quiet, suddenly a midnight surge—either there’s news or the main force is launching a sneak attack.
RSI6 shot up to 83, an overbought signal lit up, and the upper Bollinger band at 0.052 was pierced. Seeing this sharp rally, I opened a small short position around 0.053, betting it will pull back after the spike. These kinds of pump-and-dump coins rise fast and fall fast, but if it keeps pushing hard tomorrow, I’ll have to accept the loss on this trade.
Purely trial and error, holding a small position, will decide what to do tomorrow based on the situation.
Brothers, do you think this kind of midnight sneak attack rally can last? Does my short have a chance tomorrow? Let’s chat in the comments.🙈#波动雷达：币种异动观察 #创作者激励 #OKX星球话题来啦 $BTC , $ETH , $SOL — I DON’T BUY ALL THREE FOR THE SAME REASON
When the market weakens, $BTC $76.83K holds the foundation. When capital returns, $ETH $2.48K offers expansion. When risk appetite rises, $SOL $99.70 becomes the flexible layer.
$BTC is below $78.63K.
$ETH holds $2.42K .
$SOL remains below $103.95
My view: Prices change, but each position’s role shouldn’t change with every candle.
A core portfolio doesn’t need to predict the winner — it needs to prepare for all three s$BTC , $ETH , $SOL — I DON’T BUY ALL THREE FOR THE SAME REASON
When the market weakens, $BTC $76.83K holds the foundation. When capital returns, $ETH $2.48K offers expansion. When risk appetite rises, $SOL $99.70 becomes the flexible layer.
$BTC is below $78.63K.
$ETH holds $2.42K .
$SOL remains below $103.95
My view: Prices change, but each position’s role shouldn’t change with every candle.
A core portfolio doesn’t need to predict the winner — it needs to prepare for all three#Feeling great💥
Got lucky to survive again🚀
Wasn't the big whale pulling hard just now?
Why isn't it pulling anymore?
Or did it realize it can't break me?
Still holding 60 $ETH short positions
Now only about 60 points away from breaking even
Breaking even is really just ahead
—
Intraday dropped from 2606 straight down to 2391
Hourly chart has formed a bearish alignment
MACD green bars continue to expand!
—
Macro is also supporting the bears
Oil price surged near $108
10-year US Treasury yield approaching 5%
Market is pricing in rate hike expectations early
US stocks and crypto are both under pressure
This time it's not ETH going crazy alone
It's a collective bloodletting of risk assets
—
$ZEC down 2.43% intraday
24-hour trading volume about $910 million
SwissBorg's new listing gave the privacy sector another breath
So don't blindly short near 1100
Only if it truly breaks below 1100 and fails to recover
Then look down to 1050 and 1000
Resistance remains between 1160 and 1220 above
—
$SNDK down 1.24% intraday
Nasdaq weakening
High valuation chip stocks continue to give back gains
It’s also hard for it to rally independently
If 1528 breaks, then look at 1500
If rebound can't reclaim 1579 to 1600
Overall still a weak structure
#本周FOMC揭晓，加息能否落地？
#AI发展焦虑升温，芯片股集体走弱 $CP Last night my hand trembled slightly when setting the stop loss, and this morning I realized it was an unnecessary act of filial piety.
CP rebounded to the top last night but couldn't hold on, the volume became increasingly weak, how far can a trend with insufficient support go? I opened a short at 0.04261, set protection above, then casually closed the screen and went to sleep. When I opened the screen this morning, the price had slid to 0.01231, a steady +1422.2% in hand.
First, take profit on 80%, keep the remaining 20% as a seed, and move the stop loss to the cost basis. Brothers on board, watch your profits, don't let the meat at your mouth slip away again.
The money earned is the realization of knowledge; the money lost is a flaw in understanding. Don't get inflated by profits, don't despair over drawdowns.
For those who haven't gotten on board, listen to me: now is not the time to rush, the price has dropped too fast, a short-term rebound could come at any time. I will notify you first when the next more comfortable entry point arrives.
$ZEC $SNDK $BTC , $ETH , $SOL — I DON’T BUY ALL THREE FOR THE SAME REASON
When the market weakens, $BTC $76.83K holds the foundation. When capital returns, $ETH $2.48K offers expansion. When risk appetite rises, $SOL $99.70 becomes the flexible layer.
$BTC is below $78.63K.
$ETH holds $2.42K .
$SOL remains below $103.95
My view: Prices change, but each position’s role shouldn’t change with every candle.
A core portfolio doesn’t need to predict the winner — it needs to prepare for all three